Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Moosa, S. On the Empirical Existence of a Monetarisi Steady State. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 14(3), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.14.3.350
Moosa, Suleman A. "On the Empirical Existence of a Monetarisi Steady State" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 14.3, 1981, 350-383. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.14.3.350
Moosa, Suleman A. (1981): On the Empirical Existence of a Monetarisi Steady State, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 14, iss. 3, 350-383, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.14.3.350

Format

On the Empirical Existence of a Monetarisi Steady State

Moosa, Suleman A.

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 14 (1981), Iss. 3 : pp. 350–383

Additional Information

Article Details

Moosa, Suleman A.

References

  1. Almons, S.: “The Distributed Lag Between Capital Appropriations and Expenditures”, Econometrica, January, 1965, vol. 30, pp. 178 - 196.  Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.: “The Future and the Present in Economic Life”, Economic Inquiry, April 1978.  Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R. and F. Fischer: “Recent Developments in Monetary Theory”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2, April 1976.  Google Scholar
  4. Box, G.E.P. and G.M. Jenkins: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, revised edition, San Francisco: Holden Day, 1976.  Google Scholar
  5. Brunner, K.: “The ‘Monetarist Revolution in Monetary Theory”, Weltwirtsch. Arch., 1970, 105 (1).  Google Scholar
  6. Cochrane, D. and G. Orcutt: “Application of Least Squares to Relationships Containing Autocorrelated Error Terms”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44 (1949), pp. 32-61.  Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, M.: “What Price Guideposts”, in Guidelines: Informal Controls and the Market Place, ed. by G.P. Schultz and R.F. Aliber (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1966).  Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, M.: “Factors Affecting the Level of Interest Rates”, Proceedings of the 1968 Conference on Savings and Residential Financing, sponsored by the United States Savings and Loan League.  Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M.: “A Theoretical Framework of Monetary Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, March/April 1970, 78(2).  Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, M.: “A Monetary Theory of Nominal Income”, Journal of Political Economy, March/April 1971, 79 (2).  Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, M.: “Money and Inflation”, Newsweek, September 20, 1976.  Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, M.: “Inflation and Unemployment”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, no. 3, 1977.  Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, M.: “Inflation and Recession”, Newsweek, April 24, 1978.  Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, B.: “The Theoretical Nondebate about Monetarism”, in Thomas Mayer, The Structure of Monetarism, (W. W. Norton and Company, 1978).  Google Scholar
  15. Frisch, H.: “Inflation Theory 1963 - 1975: A ‘Second Generation’ Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature XV, 4, December, 1977.  Google Scholar
  16. Gibson, W.: Interest Rates and Monetary Policy”, Journal of Political Economy, 78, 3, May/June 1970.  Google Scholar
  17. Goldfeld, S.: “The Demand of Money Revisited”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 1973.  Google Scholar
  18. Goldfeld, S.: “The Case of Missing Money”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1977.  Google Scholar
  19. Hicks, J.: “Some Question of Time in Economics”, in Evolution, Welfare and Time in Economics: Essays in honor of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. Edited by A.M. Tang, F.M. Westerfield and J.S. Worley, Lexington, Mass: Heath, Lexington Books, 1976 pp. 133 - 157.  Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, H.: “Recent Developments in Monetary Theory - A Commenatry”, in Money in Britain, 1959 - 1969, ed. by D.R. Croome and H.G. Johnson (Oxford University Press, 1970).  Google Scholar
  21. Laidler, D.: “Money and Money Income: An essay on the ‘transmission mechanism’, Journal of Monetary Economics, April 1978.  Google Scholar
  22. Logue, D. and Willet, T.: “A Note of the Relation Between the Mean and the Variability of Inflation”, Economica, 43, 1976.  Google Scholar
  23. Mayer, T.: The Structure of Monetarism, (W.W. Norton, New York, 1978).  Google Scholar
  24. Modigliani: “The Monetarist Controversy or, Should We Forsake Stabilization Policy”, American Economic Review, March 1977.  Google Scholar
  25. Moosa, S. A.: “Dynamic Portfolio-Balance Behavior of Time Deposits and ‘Money’”, Journal of Finance (June 1977 a).  Google Scholar
  26. Moosa, S. A.: “The Behavior of Velocity”, Working Paper 77-09 CBA, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, 1977 b.  Google Scholar
  27. Moosa, S. A.: “The Ability to Anticipate Inflation”, Working Paper 78-10, CBA, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, 1978.  Google Scholar
  28. Moosa, S. A.: “The Dynamics of Interest Rate Adjustment in Response to Monetary and Fiscal Changes”, Eastern Economic Journal, IV, 1979.  Google Scholar
  29. Park, Y. C.: “Some Current Issues on the Transmission Process of Monetary Policy”, Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund (March 1972).  Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, J.: “What are the Questions”, Journal of Economic Literature, December 1977.  Google Scholar
  31. Seidman, L.: “The Role of a Tax-Based Incomes Policy”, American Economic Review, May 1979.  Google Scholar
  32. Slovin, M. and Sushka, E. M.: “The Structural Shift in the Demand for Money”, Journal of Finance, June 1975.  Google Scholar
  33. Tobin, J.: “Money and Income: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, (May 1970), 84, pp. 301 - 317.  Google Scholar
  34. Vining, D. R. and Elwertowski, T. C.: “The Relationship Between Relative Prices and the General Price Level”, American Economic Review, September 1976.  Google Scholar
  35. Weintraub, S.: “Capitalism’s Inflation and Unemployment Crisis”, Addison-Wesley, 1978.  Google Scholar

Abstract

On the Existence of a Monetarist Steady State

The worldwide acceleration of inflation over the last decade has been associated with (and apparently responsible for) an ascendancy of the Monetarist school of thought. Monetarist-inspired models make a sharp distinction between nominal and real variables and rely heavily, in line with Classical tradition, on steady state solutions to draw inferences about economic policy. Accordingly, both the existence of a particular steady state, and the rate of convergence of economic variables to (or the extent and nature of their departure from) their steady state values become of not inconsiderable interest. That is especially the case if the rate of time preference is positive. A variable of particular interest is the behavior of velocity growth. Even though Monetarist models differ in some matters of detail they all, explicitly or implicitly, assign a pivotal role to the behavior of velocity growth. It is assumed to equal zero or a technologically-determined constant in steady state equilibrium. By contrast, alternative models, say of unemployment, economic growth or inflation, explicity or implicity, have velocity growth take on (behaviorally-explained) non-constant values. This paper examines the steady state and related properties of velocity growth by using Friedman’s widely discussed Monetarist model as the point of departure.