JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Beyond the Analytics of the Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments: Methodology, Innovation and Monetarism
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 13 (1980), Iss. 1 : pp. 66–82
Additional Information
Article Details
Fausten, Dietrich K
References
-
Blaug, Mark: Economic Theory in Retrospect, 2nd ed. (London: Heinemann, 1968).
Google Scholar -
Brunner, Karl: “The ‘Monetarist Revolution’ in Monetary Theory,”Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 105 (1970), pp. 1-29.
Google Scholar -
Brunner, Karl: “Issues of Post-Keynesian Monetary Analysis,” Kredit und Kapital, 9 (No. 11976), pp. 24 - 55.
Google Scholar -
Corden, W. M.: “Review of H. G. Johnson: Aspects of the Theory of Tariffs,” Economic Journal, 82 (June 1972), pp. 725-7.
Google Scholar -
Dobb, Maurice: Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1973).
Google Scholar
Abstract
In the present study an attempt is made to elucidate the meaning of the frequent attributions in the literature on the frequent attributions in the literature on the monetary approach to David Hume, and to the classical tradition of balance of payments analysis. Given the distinct analytical dissimilarities between the classical, specifically the Humean, and contemporary monetary approaches, it is contended that this meaning lies outside the sphere of the specific analytics of economic model-building. Instead, it is argued, the recurring references to orthodoxy are indicative of a non-extremist methodological approach to the history of economic thought, and further that they are consistent with the requirements of innovation in economics as well as with the express desire to dissociate the monetary approach from contemporary monetarism.