Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Conrad, K. Portfolioanalyse und die Konstruktion monetärer Modelle. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 11(4), 517-553. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.11.4.517
Conrad, Klaus "Portfolioanalyse und die Konstruktion monetärer Modelle" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 11.4, 1978, 517-553. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.11.4.517
Conrad, Klaus (1978): Portfolioanalyse und die Konstruktion monetärer Modelle, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 11, iss. 4, 517-553, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.11.4.517

Format

Portfolioanalyse und die Konstruktion monetärer Modelle

Conrad, Klaus

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 11 (1978), Iss. 4 : pp. 517–553

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Conrad, Klaus

Cited By

  1. A monetary model of the Dutch economy

    van Erp, F.A.M.

    Hasselman, B.H.

    Nibbelink, A.G.H.

    Timmer, H.R.

    Economic Modelling, Vol. 6 (1989), Iss. 1 P.56

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-9993(89)90014-X [Citations: 10]

References

  1. Brainard, C. and Tobin, J., „Pitfalls in Financial Model Building“, American Economic Review, 58, 1968, Papers and Proceedings, 99 - 122.  Google Scholar
  2. Christ, Carl F., „Econometric Models of the Financial Sector“, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1971, 419- 446.  Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W. and Lau, L. J., „Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions” American Economic Review, 65, 1975, 367- 383.  Google Scholar
  4. Conrad, K., An Application of Duality Theorie: A Portfolio Composition of the West German Private Non-Bank Sector, 1961 - 1975, Diskussionspapier Nr. 93, 1978, Universität Bonn.  Google Scholar
  5. Diewert, W. E. (1974), Applications of Duality Theory, in: M. D. Intriligator and D. A. Kendrick (Hrsg.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Amsterdam 1974 (North-Holland), Vol.2.  Google Scholar
  6. Fand, David J., „Geldtheorie und ökonometrische Großmodelle“, Kredit und Kapital, 5, 1972, 121 - 154.  Google Scholar
  7. Goldfeld, S. M., An Extension of the Monetary Sector, in: The Brookings Modell: Some further results, Amsterdam 1969, 319-353.  Google Scholar
  8. Klein, L. R., Economic Fluctuations in the United States 1921- 1941, Cowles Commission Monograph No. 11, New York-London 1950.  Google Scholar
  9. Kösters, W., Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen der Geldnachfrage, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1974.  Google Scholar
  10. Lau, L. J. (1969), „Duality and the Structure of Utility Functions”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 1, 374- 396.  Google Scholar
  11. de Leeuw, F., A Model of Financial Behaviour, in: B. Duesenberry et al. (eds.), The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the U.S. Economy, Chicago-Amsterdam 1965, 494 - 530.  Google Scholar
  12. Lutz, F. A., „Probleme der Zinstheorie“, in: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Heft 1, 1968.  Google Scholar
  13. Malinvaud, E., Statistical Methods of Econometrics, Amsterdam 1970.  Google Scholar
  14. Markowitz, H. M., „Portfolio Selection“, The Journal of Finance, 1952, 77-91.  Google Scholar
  15. Martiensen, J., Ein ökonometrisches Vierteljahresmodell des Geld- und Kreditsektors für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Meisenheim 1975.  Google Scholar
  16. Parkin, J. M., Gray, M. R. und Barret, R. J., „The Portfolio Behaviour of Commercial Banks“, in: K. Hilton and D. Heathfield (eds.), The Econometric Study of the United Kingdom, London 1970.  Google Scholar
  17. Pohl, R., „Zur Kritik der Theorie der Vermögensstruktur und der relativen Preise“, Kredit und Kapital, 8, 1975.  Google Scholar
  18. Siebke, J. und Willms, M., „Zinsniveau, Geldpolitik und Inflation“, Kredit und Kapital, 5, 1972.  Google Scholar
  19. Tobin, J., „Liquidity Preference as Behaviour Towards Risk“, in: Review of Economic Studies, 25, 1958, 65 - 86.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Portfolio Analysis and the Construction of Monetary Models

This contribution aims at formulating an optimization model based on budget theory for the derivation of supply and demand functions for assets and liabilities. Since the approaches in empirical studies deviate considerably from the theoretical conception of portfolio decision-making, a budget-theory portfolio model for characterizing monetary preferences seems to be more suitable for empirical studies than the conventional portfolio model with differing expectations and variances, i.e., risks. For there is scarcely a link connecting the process of framing an expectation and the determination of expectation and variance with the demand system that is to be estimated econometrically, so that in econometric studies the difference between a theoretically well founded portfolio model and an ad hoc demand system based on holdings cannot be perceived. For the derivation of supply and demand functions for paper titles, the contribution postulates that the household’s financial preferences can be characterized by a utility function, in respect of which the arguments are the expected interest payments in the form of returns and costs implied by the claims held and liabilities incurred at the expected interest rates. Using the appropriate indirect utility function, with the interest and financial assets as arguments, an integrable demand system for paper titles is derived, which is compatible with the maximization hypothesis and conforms to the Yale principles of monetary model construction. Since this system gives optimal stocks, an adjustment mechanism can be specified to explain the deviation of the observed data from the optimal stocks. With quarterly data for the Federal Republic of Germany for the period from 1968-1975, a supply system with five assets and a demand system with four liabilities are estimated for the private non-banking sector.