Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Hentschel, N. The Microfoundations of Monetary Theory. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 9(1), 70-100. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.9.1.70
Hentschel, Norbert "The Microfoundations of Monetary Theory" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 9.1, 1976, 70-100. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.9.1.70
Hentschel, Norbert (1976): The Microfoundations of Monetary Theory, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 9, iss. 1, 70-100, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.9.1.70

Format

The Microfoundations of Monetary Theory

Hentschel, Norbert

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 9 (1976), Iss. 1 : pp. 70–100

Additional Information

Article Details

Hentschel, Norbert

References

  1. Arrow, K. J.; Hahn, F. H. (1971): General Competitive Analysıs, San Francisco.  Google Scholar
  2. Brunner, K.; Meltzer, A. H. (1971): The Uses of Money: Money in the Theory of an Exchange Economy, in: American Economic Review, 61, 784-805.  Google Scholar
  3. Clower, R. W. (1965): The Keynesian Counterrevolution: A Theoretical Appraisal, reprinted in: Clower (ed.): Monetary Theory, Harmondsworth 1969, 270-297.  Google Scholar
  4. Clower, R. W. (1967): A Reconsideration of the Microfoundations of Monetary Theory, reprinted in: Clower (ed.): Monetary Theory, 202 - 211.  Google Scholar
  5. Clower, R. W. (1970): Is There an Optimal Money Supply? in: The Journal of Finance, 25, 425 - 433.  Google Scholar
  6. Clower, R. W. (1971): Theoretical Foundations of Monetary Policy, in: Monetary Theory and Monetary Policy in the 1970’s, London, 15 - 28.  Google Scholar
  7. Debreu, G. (1959): Theory of Value, New York.  Google Scholar
  8. Feige, E. L.; Parkin, M. (1971): 'The Optimal Quantity of Money, Bonds, Commodity Inventories, and Capital, in: American Economic Review, 61, 335-349.  Google Scholar
  9. Feldmann, A. M. (1973): Bilateral Trading Processes, Pairwise Optimality and Pareto Optimality, in: Review of Economic Studies, 40, 463 - 472.  Google Scholar
  10. Foley, D. K. (1970): Equilibrium with Costly Marketing, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 276 - 291.  Google Scholar
  11. Grandmont, J.-M.; Younes, Y. (1972): On the Role of Money and the Fxistence of a Monetary Equilibrium, in: Review of Economic Studies, 39, 355-372.  Google Scholar
  12. Grandmont, J.-M.; Younes, Y. (1973): On the Efficiency of a Monetary Equilibrium, in: Review of Economic Studies, 40, 149 - 165.  Google Scholar
  13. Green, J. R. (1971): Temporary General Equilibrium in a Sequential Trading Model with Spot and Future Transactions, C.O.R.E. Discussion Paper 7127, August 1971.  Google Scholar
  14. Green, J. R. (1972): Pre-Existing Contracts and Temporary General Equilibrium, Harvard University Discussion Paper 246, June 1972.  Google Scholar
  15. Hahn, F. H. (1965): On Some Problems of Proving the Existence of an Equilibrium in a Monetary Economy, in: Clower (ed.): Readings in Monetary Theory, Harmondsworth 1969, 191 - 201.  Google Scholar
  16. Hahn, F. H. (1971 a): Equilibrıum with Transaction Costs, in: Econometrica, 39, 417 - 439.  Google Scholar
  17. Hahn, F.H. (1971 b): Professor Friedman’s View on Money, in: Economica, 38, 61 - 80.  Google Scholar
  18. Hahn, F. H. (1973 a): On the Foundations of Monetary Theory, in: Essays in Modern Economics, ed. by M. Parkin with A. R. Nobay, London, 230 - 242.  Google Scholar
  19. Hahn, F. H. (1973 b): On Transaction Costs, Inessential Sequence Economies and Money, in: Review of Economic Studies, 40, 449 - 461.  Google Scholar
  20. Hayashı, T. (1974): The Non-Pareto Efficiency of Inıtial Allocation of Commodities and Monetary Equilibrium: An Inside Money Economy, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 173 - 187.  Google Scholar
  21. Heller, W. P. (1972): Transactions with Set-Up Costs, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 465 - 478.  Google Scholar
  22. Heller, W. P.; Starr, R. (1973): Equilibrium in a Monetary Economy with Non-Convex Transactions Costs, Technical Report 110, Economic Series, Stanford, September 1973.  Google Scholar
  23. Heller, W. P. (1974): The Holding of Money Balances in General Equilibrium, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 93 - 108.  Google Scholar
  24. Hirshleifer, ]J. (1973): Exchange Theory: The Missing Chapter, in: Western Economic Journal, 11, 129 - 146.  Google Scholar
  25. Howitt, P. W. (1973): Walras and Monetary Theory, in: Western Economic Journal, 11, 481 - 500.  Google Scholar
  26. Howitt, P. W. (1974): Stability and the Quantity Theory, in: Journal of Political Economy, 82, 133 - 152.  Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, H. G. (1974): Major Issues in Monetary Economics, in: Oxford Economic Papers, 26, 212 - 225.  Google Scholar
  28. Karni, E. (1973): Transactions Costs and the Demand for Media of Exchange, in: Western Economic Journal, 11, 71-80.  Google Scholar
  29. Kurz, M. (1974 a): Equilibrium with Transaction Cost and Money in a Single-Market Exchange Economy, in: Econometrica, 42, 1-20.  Google Scholar
  30. Kurz, M. (1974 b): Equilibrium in a Finite Sequence of Markets with Transaction Costs, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 418-452.  Google Scholar
  31. Leijonhufvud, A. (1968): On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, New York.  Google Scholar
  32. Leijonhufvud, A. (1973): Effective Demand Failures, in: Swedish Journal of Economics, 75, 27-48.  Google Scholar
  33. Marschak, J. (1950): The Rationale of the Demand for Money and of ‘Money Illusion’, in: Metroeconomica, 2, 71 - 100.  Google Scholar
  34. Niehans, J. (1971): Money and Barter in General Equilibrium with Transactions Costs, in: American Economic Review, 61, 773 - 783.  Google Scholar
  35. Ostroy, J. M. (1973): The Informational Efficiency of Monetary Exchange, in: American Economic Review, 63, 597- 610.  Google Scholar
  36. Ostroy, J. M.; Starr, R. (1973): Money and the Decentralization of Exchange, Discussion Paper 41, Department of Economics, University of California, Los Angeles, October 1973.  Google Scholar
  37. Patinkin, D. (1965): Money, Interest and Prices, 2nd edition, New York.  Google Scholar
  38. Perlman, M. (1971): The Roles of Money in an Economy and the Optimum Quantity of Money, in: Economica, 38, 233 - 252.  Google Scholar
  39. Pethig, R. (1973): Equilibrium and Media of Exchange in a One-Period General Equilibrium Model with Transactions Costs and Paper Money, University of Mannheim, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, August 1973.  Google Scholar
  40. Radner, R. (1972): Existence of Equilibrium of Plans, Prices and Price Expectations in a Sequence of Markets, in: Econometrica, 40, 289-303.  Google Scholar
  41. Samuelson, P. A. (1968): What Classical and Neo-Classical Monetary Theory Really Was, in: Canadian Journal of Economics, 1, 1-15.  Google Scholar
  42. Shubik, M. (1972): A Theory of Money and Financial Institutions, Part VIII, Transactions Costs in a Market Economy, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 336.  Google Scholar
  43. Sontheimer, K. (1972): On the Determination of Money Prices, in: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 4, 489-508.  Google Scholar
  44. Sontheimer, K. (1973): A Technological Representation of Money, in: Metroeconomica, 25, 136-152.  Google Scholar
  45. Starr, R. M. (1970): Equilibrium and Demand for Media of Exchange in a Pure Exchange Economy with Transactions Costs, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 300, Yale University, October 1970.  Google Scholar
  46. Starr, R. M. (1972): The Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86, 290 - 302.  Google Scholar
  47. Starr, R. M. (1974): The Price of Money in a Pure Exchange Monetary Economy, in: Econometrica, 42, 45 - 54.  Google Scholar
  48. Starrett, D. (1973): Inefficiency and the Demand for ‘Money’ in a Sequence Economy, in: Review of Economic Studies, 40, 427-448.  Google Scholar
  49. Ulph, A. M.; Ulph, D. T. (1974): Efficiency, Inessentiality and Money, Discussion Paper in Economics 19, University of Stirling, April 1974.  Google Scholar
  50. Uzawa, H. (1960): Walras’ Tatonnement in the Theory of Exchange, in: Review of Economic Studies, 27, 182-194.  Google Scholar
  51. Veendorp, E.C.H. (1970): General Equilibrium Theory for a Barter Economy, in: Western Economic Journal, 8, 1-23.  Google Scholar
  52. Wallace, N. (1972): An Approach to the Study of Monetary and Nonmonetary Exchange Structures, in: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 4, 338-847.  Google Scholar
  53. Walker, D. A. (1970): Leon Walras in Light of His Correspondence and Related Papers, in: Journal of Political Economy, 78, 685 - 701.  Google Scholar
  54. Walras, L. (1954): Elements of Pure Economics, translated by William Jaffe, London.  Google Scholar

Abstract

The Microfoundations of Monetary Theory

Following an initial brief mention of some fundamental problems of microeconomic monetary theory in the introduction, it is shown how rudimentary equilibrium models of the Arrow-Debreu type are from the viewpoint of transaction theory. Traditional equilibrium theory does not explain why there are objects in the real national income which perform the function of a medium of exchange. Consequently it also fails to explain why just a few goods are used as dominant media of exchange. Furthermore, it is completely unclear how the economic interaction of individuals is coped with in the transformation from the initial to the equilibrium allocation. The theory proceeds implicitly from the assumption that this process is of a decentralized nature as far as information is concerned, but only at the cost of assuming a non-specified perfect exchange organization, with the result that all information and co-ordination problems deriving from the interdependence of individual exchange activities are eliminated by definition. Traditional equilibrium theory further fails to explain why individuals can acquire a positive amount of a “useful” good with a unit of a good having no inherent value (paper money). The function of money as a general medium of exchange is not sufficiently well grounded in the model structure. Moreover, since the same equilibrium allocation ıs attainable both with and without the help of intermediate transactions, the idea suggests itself of regarding all positive intermediate transactions as functionless. Lastly, the theory gives no answer to the question why the exchange organization observed in reality came into being, because in this approach exchange is not conceived as an economic activity that requires resources, that is to say, there is no choice between different exchange organizations (transaction technologies). Starting out from these deliberations, this essay discusses approaches which set out to modify the initial model, which is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of transaction theory. By allowing for transaction costs, exchange can be conceived as an economic activity ın which the choice between various modes of exchange becomes an economically relevant decision-making problem. Transaction costs can be taken into account by the following alternative procedures: On the one hand, every individual can be assigned the dual function of consumption and exchange; on the other hand, however, the two economic activities of consumption and exchange can be isolated from each other for analysıs, drawing a distinction between a household sector comprising households only and a sector consisting solely of exchange intermediaries. However, this approach seems to afford few possibilities of advancing very far beyond the initial model in the matter of the use of media of exchange. The groundwork for this is provided by another approach in which (neglecting transaction costs) the function of money as a medium of exchange can be well founded and explained in the model by the conception of exchange as bilateral interaction.