Menu Expand

Monetarism in Historical Perspective

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Cagan, P. Monetarism in Historical Perspective. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 9(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.9.2.154
Cagan, Phillip "Monetarism in Historical Perspective" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 9.2, 1976, 154-163. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.9.2.154
Cagan, Phillip (1976): Monetarism in Historical Perspective, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 9, iss. 2, 154-163, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.9.2.154

Format

Monetarism in Historical Perspective

Cagan, Phillip

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 9 (1976), Iss. 2 : pp. 154–163

Additional Information

Article Details

Cagan, Phillip

References

  1. 1. Milton Friedman, 'The Effect of a Full-Employment Policy on Economic Stability: A Formal Analysis, in his Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, 1953.  Google Scholar
  2. 2. Milton Friedman, A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability, American Economic Review, June 1948, 24564, reprinted in his Essays, ibid..  Google Scholar
  3. 3. Milton Friedman and Anna ]J. Schwartz, A Monetary History of the United States 1867-1960, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1963.  Google Scholar
  4. 4. John R. Hicks, Mr. Keynes and the “Classics”, A Suggested Interpretation, Econometrica, 1937, reprinted in W. Fellner and B. F. Haley (eds.), Readings in the Theory of Income Distribution, Philadelphia, 1946.  Google Scholar
  5. 5. Benjamin Klein, Our New Monetary Standard: The Measurement and Effects of Price Uncertainty, 1880-1973, Economic Inquiry, Dec. 1975, 461-84.  Google Scholar
  6. 5a. Levis A. Kochin, Are Future Taxes Anticipated by Consumers? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Aug. 1974, 385-94.  Google Scholar
  7. 6. Robert E. Lucas, Jr., Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique, manuscript, 1973, forthcoming in volume edited by Karl Brunner to be published by North Holland.  Google Scholar
  8. 7. A. James Meigs. Money Matters, Harper and Row, 1972.  Google Scholar
  9. 8. Lawrence H. Meyer and William R. Hart, On the Effects of Fiscal and Monetary Policy: Completing the Taxonomy, American Economic Review, September 1975. 762-67.  Google Scholar
  10. 9. Lloyd W. Mints, A History of Banking Iheory, Chicago, 1945.  Google Scholar
  11. 10. ibid., Monetary Policy for a Competitive Society, McGraw Hill, 1950.  Google Scholar
  12. 11. D.H. Robertson, Lectures on Economic Principles, vol. III, Staples Press, London, 1959.  Google Scholar
  13. 12. "Thomas J. Sargent and Neil Wallace, Rational Expectations and the Theory of Economic Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Studies in Monetary Economics 2, June 1975.  Google Scholar
  14. 13. ibid., Rational Expectations, the Optimal Monetary Instrument, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule, Journal of Political Economy, April 1975, 241-54.  Google Scholar
  15. 14. Henry C. Simons, Economic Policy for a Free Society, Chicago, 1948.  Google Scholar
  16. 15. Jerome L. Stein (ed.), Monetarism, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976. 16. Jacob Viner, Studies in the 'ITheory of International Trade, Harper, 1937.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Monetarism in Historical Perspective

The monetarist view grew out of the climate of professional economic opinion in the 1940s and early 1950s when discussions of policy paid no attention to money. Monetarism is a set of propositions about policy. It fosters theoretical models of the economy in which money is given a prominent role, but it is not dependent upon any particular model. Monetarısm has helped to re-establish the importance of a proper monetary policy to economic stabilization. Much of the monetarist view has come to be widely accepted. A controversy between monetarists and fiscalists which remains unsettled is whether a discretionary fiscal policy would be needed if a policy of fairly stable monetary growth were pursued. The monetarist position is that such a monetary policy would produce greater stabilization than we have had in the past and that we would then be better off with an automatic than a discretionary fiscal policy.