Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Hujer, R. Evaluation der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Deutschland: Stand der empirischen Forschung. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 126(3), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.126.3.343
Hujer, Reinhard "Evaluation der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Deutschland: Stand der empirischen Forschung" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 126.3, 2006, 343-357. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.126.3.343
Hujer, Reinhard (2006): Evaluation der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Deutschland: Stand der empirischen Forschung, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 126, iss. 3, 343-357, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.126.3.343

Format

Evaluation der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Deutschland: Stand der empirischen Forschung

Hujer, Reinhard

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 126 (2006), Iss. 3 : pp. 343–357

2 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Hujer, Reinhard

Cited By

  1. Active Labour Market Programme Participation for Unemployment Insurance Recipients: A Systematic Review

    Filges, Trine | Smedslund, Geir | Knudsen, Anne‐Sofie Due | Jørgensen, Anne‐Marie Klint

    Campbell Systematic Reviews, Vol. 11 (2015), Iss. 1 P.1

    https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2015.2 [Citations: 12]
  2. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen der informationellen Infrastruktur in Deutschland

    Rolf, Gabriele | Zwick, Markus | Wagner, Gert G

    Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 128 (2008), Iss. 4 P.631

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.4.631 [Citations: 8]

Abstract

The most important aim of the programmes of labour market policy in Germany is the permanent integration of unemployed persons into regular employment. Besides microeconometric studies, macroeconometric approaches and estimations of costs and benefits are necessary to evaluate the different labour market measures. Microeconometric models using mostly matching methods are the basis for calculating the average employment effect of the measure. Until 2000 survey data sets are the data basis for microeconometric studies. Now administrative data of the Federal Employment Agency are available to analyze group-, regional-, and programme-specific employment effects. However, differences due to the timing of the measures have not yet been analyzed. We estimate these effects of job creation schemes for participants and present the empirical results.