GMG, Kopfpauschalen und Bürgerversicherungen: Der aktuelle Reformstand und seine intergenerativen Verteilungswirkungen
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
GMG, Kopfpauschalen und Bürgerversicherungen: Der aktuelle Reformstand und seine intergenerativen Verteilungswirkungen
Fetzer, Stefan | Hagist, Christian
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 124 (2004), Iss. 3 : pp. 387–420
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Fetzer, Stefan
Hagist, Christian
Cited By
-
Pflegereform 2010: Karenzzeiten in der Sozialen Pflegeversicherung
Häcker, Jasmin | Hackmann, Tobias | Raffelhüschen, BerndZeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Vol. 100 (2011), Iss. 3 P.347
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-011-0145-3 [Citations: 4] -
Ende des rot-grünen Projektes
Weder Rot noch grün. Machterosion und Interessenfragmentierung bei Staat und Verbänden in der Gesundheitspolitik
Bandelow, Nils | Hartmann, Anja2007
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90302-6_15 [Citations: 7]
Abstract
The new law „GKV-Modernisierungsgesetz" was introduced in 2003 to stabilize the expenditures of the German public health sector in a long-term perspective. Two alternative reform proposals, "Kopfpauschalen" and "Bürgerversicherung", have also been put forward to secure the financing of the public health sector in the long run. Using a generational accounting approach we show that the „GKV-Modernisierungsgesetz" has not succeeded in achieving this goal. To analyze the reform proposals "Kopfpauschalen" and "Bürgerversicherung", we give a structured comparison of current political commissions concepts. The analysis shows that these concepts as well as the new law all fail to meet the goal of sustainable financing. Furthermore we point out the intergenerational distribution effects induced by the new law and the reform concepts.