Menu Expand

Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Kraft, K., Stank, J. Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 124(3), 421-449. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.124.3.421
Kraft, Komelius and Stank, Jörg "Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 124.3, 2004, 421-449. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.124.3.421
Kraft, Komelius/Stank, Jörg (2004): Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 124, iss. 3, 421-449, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.124.3.421

Format

Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen

Kraft, Komelius | Stank, Jörg

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 124 (2004), Iss. 3 : pp. 421–449

8 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Kraft, Komelius

Stank, Jörg

Cited By

  1. Worker Directors: A German Product that Did Not Export?

    ADDISON, JOHN T. | SCHNABEL, CLAUS

    Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 50 (2011), Iss. 2 P.354

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2011.00639.x [Citations: 16]
  2. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance

    Voluntary Co-determination Produces Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    Osterloh, Margit | Frey, Bruno S. | Zeitoun, Hossam

    2011

    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302112_12 [Citations: 8]
  3. One-third Co-determination in German Supervisory Boards and its Economic Consequences. New Evidence for Employment

    Boneberg, Franziska

    Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 131 (2011), Iss. 1 P.107

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.131.1.107 [Citations: 4]
  4. Intstruments of German Foreign Economic Policy for Promoting Co-Determination along Supply Chains

    Schultz, Alison

    SSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. (2017), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3781618 [Citations: 0]
  5. Do Works Councils Inhibit Investment?

    Addison, John T. | Schank, Thorsten | Schnabel, Claus | Wagner, Joachim

    ILR Review, Vol. 60 (2007), Iss. 2 P.187

    https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390706000202 [Citations: 31]
  6. Corporate governance and employee power in the boardroom: An applied game theoretic analysis

    Balsmeier, Benjamin | Bermig, Andreas | Dilger, Alexander

    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 91 (2013), Iss. P.51

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.004 [Citations: 26]
  7. Machtindex und Drittelmitbestimmung. Differenzierter Arbeitnehmereinfluss und dessen Konsequenzen

    Balsmeier, Benjamin | Dilger, Alexander | Geyer, Hannah

    Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 131 (2011), Iss. 1 P.133

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.131.1.133 [Citations: 0]
  8. Dynamic Efficiency of Supervisory Board Codetermination in Germany

    Renaud, Simon

    LABOUR, Vol. 21 (2007), Iss. 4-5 P.689

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9914.2007.00387.x [Citations: 32]

Abstract

We investigate the effects of the German codetermination law of 1976 an the innovativeness of a sample of German stock companies from the manufacturing industry. Information from 155 companies an the number of patents granted in the time period 1971-1990 is combined with other firm and industry data. The Sample, totalling 1,961 observations, is used for a difference-in-differences estimator an the question of a possible change after the introduction of the codetermination law. We find no evidence in favour of the popular hypothesis that codetermination reduces innovative activity. If anything, it increases it.