Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Kraft, K., Stank, J. Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 124(3), 421-449. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.124.3.421
Kraft, Komelius and Stank, Jörg "Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 124.3, 2004, 421-449. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.124.3.421
Kraft, Komelius/Stank, Jörg (2004): Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 124, iss. 3, 421-449, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.124.3.421

Format

Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen

Kraft, Komelius | Stank, Jörg

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 124 (2004), Iss. 3 : pp. 421–449

8 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Kraft, Komelius

Stank, Jörg

Cited By

  1. Worker Directors: A German Product that Did Not Export?

    ADDISON, JOHN T. | SCHNABEL, CLAUS

    Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 50 (2011), Iss. 2 P.354

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2011.00639.x [Citations: 16]
  2. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance

    Voluntary Co-determination Produces Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    Osterloh, Margit | Frey, Bruno S. | Zeitoun, Hossam

    2011

    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302112_12 [Citations: 8]
  3. One-third Co-determination in German Supervisory Boards and its Economic Consequences. New Evidence for Employment

    Boneberg, Franziska

    Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 131 (2011), Iss. 1 P.107

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.131.1.107 [Citations: 4]
  4. Intstruments of German Foreign Economic Policy for Promoting Co-Determination along Supply Chains

    Schultz, Alison

    SSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. (2017), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3781618 [Citations: 0]
  5. Do Works Councils Inhibit Investment?

    Addison, John T. | Schank, Thorsten | Schnabel, Claus | Wagner, Joachim

    ILR Review, Vol. 60 (2007), Iss. 2 P.187

    https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390706000202 [Citations: 31]
  6. Corporate governance and employee power in the boardroom: An applied game theoretic analysis

    Balsmeier, Benjamin | Bermig, Andreas | Dilger, Alexander

    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 91 (2013), Iss. P.51

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.004 [Citations: 24]
  7. Machtindex und Drittelmitbestimmung. Differenzierter Arbeitnehmereinfluss und dessen Konsequenzen

    Balsmeier, Benjamin | Dilger, Alexander | Geyer, Hannah

    Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 131 (2011), Iss. 1 P.133

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.131.1.133 [Citations: 0]
  8. Dynamic Efficiency of Supervisory Board Codetermination in Germany

    Renaud, Simon

    LABOUR, Vol. 21 (2007), Iss. 4-5 P.689

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9914.2007.00387.x [Citations: 31]

Abstract

We investigate the effects of the German codetermination law of 1976 an the innovativeness of a sample of German stock companies from the manufacturing industry. Information from 155 companies an the number of patents granted in the time period 1971-1990 is combined with other firm and industry data. The Sample, totalling 1,961 observations, is used for a difference-in-differences estimator an the question of a possible change after the introduction of the codetermination law. We find no evidence in favour of the popular hypothesis that codetermination reduces innovative activity. If anything, it increases it.