JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Take It or Leave It: (Non-)Take-Up Behavior of Social Assistance in Germany
Kayser, Hilke | Frick, Joachim R.
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 121 (2001), Iss. 1 : pp. 27–58
5 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Kayser, Hilke
Frick, Joachim R.
Cited By
-
Institutionalized Normality and Individual Living Situations. The Non-Take-Up of Old-Age Basic Income Support in Germany
Wilke, Felix
Swiss Journal of Sociology, Vol. 47 (2021), Iss. 2 P.181
https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2021-0014 [Citations: 1] -
To Claim or Not to Claim: Investigating Non-Take-Up of Welfare Schemes Targeting Hong Kong Older Adults and the Stigma Attached to Them
Kühner, Stefan | Chou, Kee-LeeJournal of Social Policy, Vol. (2023), Iss. P.1
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000794 [Citations: 7] -
Patterns of Welfare Dependence before and after a Reform: Evidence from First Generation Immigrants and Natives in Germany
Riphahn, Regina T. | Wunder, ChristophReview of Income and Wealth, Vol. 59 (2013), Iss. 3 P.437
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00518.x [Citations: 12] -
Non-take-up of student financial aid—A microsimulation for Germany
Herber, Stefanie P. | Kalinowski, MichaelEducation Economics, Vol. 27 (2019), Iss. 1 P.52
https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1490698 [Citations: 5] -
A New Targeting - A New Take-Up? Non-Take-Up of Social Assistance in Germany after Social Policy Reforms
Bruckmeier, Kerstin | Wiemers, JürgenSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. (2010), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1597151 [Citations: 12]
Abstract
Analyzing the under-consumption of benefits in the German means-tested Social Assistance program using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study we confirm recent high estimates of a non-take-up rate of more than 60 percent. In light of likely measurement errors in income and in our simulation of household needs, we provide a range of estimates yielding useful boundaries for the non-take-up rate. We show that the rate varies greatly depending on the determination of eligibility. Simulation results pertaining to the amount of unclaimed benefits are qualitatively similar to those for the non-take-up rate. In our multivariate analyses on determinants of (non-)take-up behavior we find distinct differences across population groups and significant impacts of proxies for stigma, application costs and social ties.