Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Holub, H., Eberharter, V., Tappeiner, G. Internationale Verflechtungen und Einflüsse in der Modernen Wachstumstheorie — eine Zeitschriftenanalyse 1939-1992. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 121(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.121.2.199
Holub, Hans Werner; Eberharter, Veronika V. and Tappeiner, Gottfried "Internationale Verflechtungen und Einflüsse in der Modernen Wachstumstheorie — eine Zeitschriftenanalyse 1939-1992" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 121.2, 2001, 199-213. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.121.2.199
Holub, Hans Werner/Eberharter, Veronika V./Tappeiner, Gottfried (2001): Internationale Verflechtungen und Einflüsse in der Modernen Wachstumstheorie — eine Zeitschriftenanalyse 1939-1992, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 121, iss. 2, 199-213, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.121.2.199

Format

Internationale Verflechtungen und Einflüsse in der Modernen Wachstumstheorie — eine Zeitschriftenanalyse 1939-1992

Holub, Hans Werner | Eberharter, Veronika V. | Tappeiner, Gottfried

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 121 (2001), Iss. 2 : pp. 199–213

Additional Information

Article Details

Holub, Hans Werner

Eberharter, Veronika V.

Tappeiner, Gottfried

Abstract

„International Linkages in Modern Growth Theory - A Journal Analysis 1939-1992

In this paper we provide an analysis of international linkages in economics, exemplified with journal articles in modern growth theory published between 1939 and 1992 in 46 economic journals. We observed the relation between European, American and international journals concerning market shares, international patterns of references and citations as well as qualitative indicators like discussion intensity in modern growth theory. The empirical results do not support the hypothesis of a US-dominance concerning market shares (even in the community of British authors). The international linkages of references and citations indicate an increasing US-orientation, but also strong intra-linkages in the German-speaking scientific community. We also found a more pronounced critical discussion on growth theory in European than in US-journals.