Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Aiginger, K., Pfaffermayr, M. Profitability Differences: Persistency and Determinants as Revealed in a Dynamic Panel Approach. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 117(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.117.1.85
Aiginger, Karl and Pfaffermayr, Michael "Profitability Differences: Persistency and Determinants as Revealed in a Dynamic Panel Approach" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 117.1, 1997, 85-105. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.117.1.85
Aiginger, Karl/Pfaffermayr, Michael (1997): Profitability Differences: Persistency and Determinants as Revealed in a Dynamic Panel Approach, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 117, iss. 1, 85-105, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.117.1.85

Format

Profitability Differences: Persistency and Determinants as Revealed in a Dynamic Panel Approach

Aiginger, Karl | Pfaffermayr, Michael

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 117 (1997), Iss. 1 : pp. 85–105

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Aiginger, Karl

Pfaffermayr, Michael

Cited By

  1. Objectives, topics and methods in industrial organization during the nineties: Results from a survey

    Aiginger, Karl

    Mueller, Dennis C.

    Weiss, Christoph

    International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 16 (1998), Iss. 6 P.799

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00006-X [Citations: 17]

Abstract

In a panel approach we have investigated the differences in profitability of industries. The economic hypotheses used for the explanation are that concentration and/or market shares are positively related to profitability, and the supergame implications that growth and stability of demand facilitate collusion. We have added structural controls for capital intensity and openness of markets and estimate fixed, as well as, random effects in three static and three dynamic panel models. The results show a pronounced persistence of profit differences, where some part of these differences can be explained by the economic hypotheses supplied by the theory.