What’s New and What’s Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation and Growth Rate Predictions
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
What’s New and What’s Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation and Growth Rate Predictions
A Critical Overview
Schneider, Johannes | Ziesemer, Thomas
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 115 (1995), Iss. 3 : pp. 429–472
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Schneider, Johannes
Ziesemer, Thomas
Cited By
-
Disequilibrium growth theory with insider–outsider effects
Flaschel, Peter
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 11 (2000), Iss. 3 P.337
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00018-7 [Citations: 2] -
Internal rates of return for public R&D from VECM estimates for 17 OECD Countries
Ziesemer, Thomas H.W.
Economic Change and Restructuring, Vol. 57 (2024), Iss. 5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09740-8 [Citations: 1]
Abstract
This paper surveys new growth theory with emphasis on three open issues known from old endogenous growth theory of the sixties: i) What is the content of the black-box variable 'technology'? ii) Which market structure prevails when endogenous technology generates dynamically increasing returns? iii) What are the justifications for and implications of different specifications of production functions for technical progress? We show that new growth theory has made progress on the first two problems but almost none with respect to the third.