Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Schneider, J., Ziesemer, T. What’s New and What’s Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation and Growth Rate Predictions. . A Critical Overview. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 115(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.115.3.429
Schneider, Johannes and Ziesemer, Thomas "What’s New and What’s Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation and Growth Rate Predictions. A Critical Overview. " Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 115.3, 1995, 429-472. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.115.3.429
Schneider, Johannes/Ziesemer, Thomas (1995): What’s New and What’s Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation and Growth Rate Predictions, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 115, iss. 3, 429-472, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.115.3.429

Format

What’s New and What’s Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation and Growth Rate Predictions

A Critical Overview

Schneider, Johannes | Ziesemer, Thomas

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 115 (1995), Iss. 3 : pp. 429–472

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Schneider, Johannes

Ziesemer, Thomas

Cited By

  1. Disequilibrium growth theory with insider–outsider effects

    Flaschel, Peter

    Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 11 (2000), Iss. 3 P.337

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00018-7 [Citations: 2]

Abstract

This paper surveys new growth theory with emphasis on three open issues known from old endogenous growth theory of the sixties: i) What is the content of the black-box variable 'technology'? ii) Which market structure prevails when endogenous technology generates dynamically increasing returns? iii) What are the justifications for and implications of different specifications of production functions for technical progress? We show that new growth theory has made progress on the first two problems but almost none with respect to the third.