Menu Expand

Bailout- und Bonitätseffekte in der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Heinemann, F. Bailout- und Bonitätseffekte in der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 115(4), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.115.4.605
Heinemann, Friedrich "Bailout- und Bonitätseffekte in der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 115.4, 1995, 605-622. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.115.4.605
Heinemann, Friedrich (1995): Bailout- und Bonitätseffekte in der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 115, iss. 4, 605-622, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.115.4.605

Format

Bailout- und Bonitätseffekte in der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion

Heinemann, Friedrich

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 115 (1995), Iss. 4 : pp. 605–622

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Heinemann, Friedrich

Cited By

  1. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - A Commentary

    Article 122 [Solidarity]

    Weber, Albrecht

    Pilz, Stefan

    2021

    https://doi.org/10.1007/16559_2021_2 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

The Maastricht Treaty, with its definition of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), has changed the incentives for national debt. Even though it has been tried to keep member states responsible for their national debt, the analysis shows that discipline solely from market pressure cannot be expected. In particular, the increasing redistribution through the EU budget weakens market discipline. The mechanism of political discipline of the Treaty is provided with an effective sanction in the second stage of EMU, an equivalent sanction in the third stage of EMU is missing, however. Therefore, there is the danger that debt incentives become powerful especially after the introduction of a common European currency.