Eine portfoliotheoretische Analyse der Friedmanschen Neuformulierung der Quantitätstheorie
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Eine portfoliotheoretische Analyse der Friedmanschen Neuformulierung der Quantitätstheorie
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 107 (1987), Iss. 1 : pp. 29–49
Additional Information
Article Details
Läufer, Nikolaus K. A.
References
-
Friedman, M. (1956), The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement, in: Friedman (Ed.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago.
Google Scholar -
Friedman, M. / Meiselman, D. (1963), The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States, 1897 - 1958, in: Commission of Money and Credit (Ed.), Impacts of Monetary Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 217 -222.
Google Scholar -
Friedman, M. / Schwartz, A. J. (1963), Money and Business Cycles. Review of Economic Studies 45, Supplement.
Google Scholar -
Laidler, D. (1977), The Demand for Money: Theories and Evidence, 2. Ed. New York.
Google Scholar -
Tobin, J. (1956), The Interest Elasticity of Transaction Demand for Cash. Review of Economic Studies 38, 241 - 247. (1958), Liquidity Preference as Behaviour Towards Risk. Review of Economic Studies 67, 65 - 86.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Friedmans money demand function is neither derived in his own writings nor elsewhere in the literature. The portfoliotheoretical foundations of his money demand function have remained in the dark. The present analysis intends to eliminate this shortcoming. Special attention is given to an explicit capitaltheoretical derivation of the rate of return of the various assets. The portfoliotheoretical analysis leads to a generalization of Friedmans money demand function that is empirically relevant. Compared with Friedman it also includes a more realistic definition of equities. The analysis demonstrates the special assumptions with respect to the behaviour of relative prices of goods and services that underly Friedman’s formulation of the money demand function. Due to these assumptions some distinguishing elements of the monetarist relative price theory are unnecessarily excluded from his money demand function. Thus Friedmans formulation of the money demand function appears not to be consistent with his ideas about the transmission mechanism of monetary impulses on economic activity.