Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Purvis, D. Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 99(1–2), 167-168. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.99.1-2.167
Purvis, Douglas D. "Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 99.1–2, 1979, 167-168. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.99.1-2.167
Purvis, Douglas D. (1979): Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 99, iss. 1–2, 167-168, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.99.1-2.167
Format
Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 99 (1979), Iss. 1–2 : pp. 167–168
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Purvis, Douglas D.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas D. Purvis: Comment on David Laidler's\r\"Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes? | 167 |