JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Purvis, D. Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 99(1–2), 167-168. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.99.1-2.167
Purvis, Douglas D. "Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 99.1–2, 1979, 167-168. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.99.1-2.167
Purvis, Douglas D. (1979): Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 99, iss. 1–2, 167-168, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.99.1-2.167
Format
Comment on David Laidler’s “Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes?”
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 99 (1979), Iss. 1–2 : pp. 167–168
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Purvis, Douglas D.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas D. Purvis: Comment on David Laidler's\r\"Are Wage and Exchange Rate Flexibility Substitutes? | 167 |