Menu Expand

Wie identifizieren KMU geeignete Ressourcen für Business-to-Business-Sharing?

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship
  4. Vol. 70, Issue 3–4
  5. pp. 151–167

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Steiner, M., Huber, S., Trachsel, V. Wie identifizieren KMU geeignete Ressourcen für Business-to-Business-Sharing?. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 70(3–4), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.70.3-4.151
Steiner, Mischa; Huber, Sebastian and Trachsel, Viviane "Wie identifizieren KMU geeignete Ressourcen für Business-to-Business-Sharing?" ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 70.3–4, 2022, 151-167. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.70.3-4.151
Steiner, Mischa/Huber, Sebastian/Trachsel, Viviane (2022): Wie identifizieren KMU geeignete Ressourcen für Business-to-Business-Sharing?, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, vol. 70, iss. 3–4, 151-167, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.70.3-4.151
Format
Download

Wie identifizieren KMU geeignete Ressourcen für Business-to-Business-Sharing?

Steiner, Mischa | Huber, Sebastian | Trachsel, Viviane

ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 70 (2022), Iss. 3–4 : pp. 151–167

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.70.3-4.151
Language
German
Pages
17

Pricing

Individual
€ 26.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Mischa Steiner, Hochschule Luzern – Wirtschaft, Zentralstrasse 9, 6002 Luzern, Schweiz

Prof. Sebastian Huber, Hochschule Luzern – Wirtschaft, Institut für Betriebs- und Regionalökonomie, Zentralstrasse 9, 6002 Luzern, Schweiz.

Prof. Viviane Trachsel, Hochschule Luzern – Wirtschaft, Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen Zug, Suurstoffi 1, 6343 Rotkreuz, Schweiz

References

  1. Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., Pinkse, J. (2017): Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006.  Google Scholar
  2. Aptekar, S. (2015): Gifts Among Strangers: The Social Organization of Freecycle Giving. Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal.  Google Scholar
  3. Barney, J. (1991): Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.  Google Scholar
  4. Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., Zhelyazkov, P. (2012): The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 531–583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.691646.  Google Scholar
  5. Gummesson, E. (2000): Qualitative methods in management research (2nd ed). Sage.  Google Scholar
  6. Hales, D. N., Siha, S. M., Sridharan, V., McKnew, J. I. (2006): Prioritizing tactical quality improvement: An action research study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(8), 866–881. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610678648.  Google Scholar
  7. Horváth, P. (2002): Der koordinationsorientierte Ansatz. In: J. Weber und B. Hirsch (Hrsg.), Controlling als akademische Disziplin (S. 49–65). Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81430-2_4.  Google Scholar
  8. Huber, S., von dem Berge, K., Burri, S., Jüttner, U., Wäfler, T., Huber, C., Niederhauser, L. (2022): B2B: A Shift from Owning to Sharing? How Sharing Facilitates new Business-to-Business Relationships between Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 2022(03), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6552613.  Google Scholar
  9. Jüttner, U., Huber, S., Furrer, S., Windler, K., Meldau, S. (2019): Mit wem, warum und wie in Dienstleistungen kooperieren? Der Entwicklungsprozess einer Toolbox für die Praxis. In: M. Bruhn und K. Hadwich (Hrsg.), Kooperative Dienstleistungen: Spannungsfelder zwischen Service Cooperation und Service Coopetition (S. 71–88). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26389-8_4.  Google Scholar
  10. Kampf, C. E., Brandt, C. J., Kampf, C. G. (2021): Using action research in innovation project management: Building legitimacy and organizational learning in an SME during a merger process. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0044.  Google Scholar
  11. Keusch, N. (2022, März 22): Können Firmen teilen lernen? Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 24.  Google Scholar
  12. Kocher, P.-Y., Kaudela-Baum, S., Wolf, P. (2011): Enhancing Organisational Innovation Capability Through Systemic Action Research: A Case of a Swiss SME in the Food Industry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9174-4.  Google Scholar
  13. Pellens, B., Fülbier, R. U., Gassen, J., Sellhorn, T. (2021): Internationale Rechnungslegung: IFRS 1 bis 17, IAS 1 bis 41, IFRIC-Interpretationen, Standardentwürfe: mit Beispielen, Aufgaben und Fallstudie (11., überarbeitete Auflage). Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.  Google Scholar
  14. Pisaniello, M. (2018, Februar 26): Sharing Economy: Schweizer kommen auf den Geschmack > umweltnetz-schweiz. https://www.umweltnetz-schweiz.ch/themen/konsum/2805-sharing-economy-in-der-schweiz.html.  Google Scholar
  15. Radjou, N. (2021): The B2B sharing revolution. Terra Nova. https://tnova.fr/site/assets/files/18554/terra-nova_note_the-b2b-sharing-revolution_181121.pdf?36rpe.  Google Scholar
  16. Rinne, A. (2019, Januar 4): 4 big trends for the sharing economy in 2019. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/sharing-economy/.  Google Scholar
  17. Schweizer, M., Trossmann, E. (1998): Break-Even-Analysen: Methodik und Einsatz. 2. Aufl., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar
  18. Soltysova, Z., Modrak, V. (2020): Challenges of the sharing economy for SMEs: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(16), 6504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166504.  Google Scholar
  19. Sterchi, W., Mattle, H., Helbling, M. (2013): Schweizer Kontenrahmen KMU. SKV.  Google Scholar
  20. Tayles, M., Drury, C. (2001): Moving from Make/Buy to Strategic Sourcing: The Outsource Decision Process. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00080-2.  Google Scholar
  21. Vatamanescu, E.-M., Alexandru, V.-A. (2018): Beyond innovation: The crazy new world of industrial mash-ups. In: E.-M. Vatamanescu und F. M. Pînzaru (Hrsg.), Knowledge Management in the Sharing Economy (Bd. 6, S. 271–285). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66890-1_14.  Google Scholar
  22. Waddell, S. (2012): Global finance as an action research domain: Testing the boundaries. Action Research, 10(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750311414736.  Google Scholar
  23. Wallenstein, J., Shelat, U. (2017): WHAT’S NEXT FOR THE SHARING ECONOMY? BCG Henderson Institute. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/strategy-technology-digital-whats-next-for-sharing-economy.  Google Scholar
  24. Weiber, R., Lichter, D. (2019): Share Economy: Die „neue“ Ökonomie des Teilens. In: T. Kollmann (Hrsg.), Handbuch Digitale Wirtschaft (S. 1–33). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17345-6_60-1.  Google Scholar
  25. Grondys, K. (2019): Implementation of the sharing economy in the B2B sector. Sustainability, 11(14), 3976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143976.  Google Scholar
  26. Gnyawali, D. R., Ryan Charleton, T. (2018): Nuances in the Interplay of Competition and Cooperation: Towards a Theory of Coopetition. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2511–2534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318788945.  Google Scholar
  27. Gleich, R. (2002): „Innovation Action Research“ als neue Methodik der Controllingforschung. In: J. Weber & B. Hirsch (Hrsg.), Controlling als akademische Disziplin (S. 439–447). Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81430-2_28.  Google Scholar
  28. Georgi, D., Bründler-Ulrich, S., Schaffner, D., Federspiel, E., Wolf, P., Abplanalp, R., Minder, B., Frölicher, J. (2019): ShareCity: Sharing-Ansätze, Sharing-Verhalten, Sharing-Strategien, Sharing-Cases in Städten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23700-4.  Google Scholar
  29. García-Unanue, J., Felipe, J. L., Gallardo, L. (2015): Using Action Research to Achieve the Implementation of Cost Accounting: The Case of the Public Sports Organizations at Local Level. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9322-3.  Google Scholar
  30. Ezzell, J. R., Vora, P. P. (2001): Leasing versus purchasing: Direct evidence on a corporation’s motivations for leasing and consequences of leasing. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(00)00060-0.  Google Scholar
  31. Eschberger, T. (2020, März 3): B2B Sharing: Der nächste Schritt für die Sharing Economy? LEAD Innovation Blog. https://www.lead-innovation.com/blog/b2b-sharing.  Google Scholar
  32. Eichhorst, W., Spermann, A. (2015): Sharing Economy–Chancen, Risiken und Gestaltungsoptionen für den Arbeitsmarkt (Nr. 69; IZA Research Report, S. 29). Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.  Google Scholar
  33. Doppio, N., Väinämö, S., Haukipuro, L. (2021): Design elements of innovation contests supporting Open Innovation in SMEs – An action research study. Journal of Innovation Management, 8(4), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.004_0003.  Google Scholar
  34. Dick, B. (2000): A beginner’s guide to action research. http://www.aral.com.au/resources/guide.html.  Google Scholar
  35. Demary, V. (2014): Competition in the sharing economy (Working Paper Nr. 19/2015). Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/112778.  Google Scholar
  36. Dekkers, R. (2000): Decision models for outsourcing and core competencies in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4085–4096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050204948.  Google Scholar
  37. Daunoriene, A., Drakšaite, A., Snieška, V., Valodkiene, G. (2015): Evaluating sustainability of sharing economy business models. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 836–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.486.  Google Scholar
  38. Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D. (2002): Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515.  Google Scholar
  39. Choi, H. R., Cho, M. J., Lee; K., Hong, S. G., Woo, C. R. (2014): The business model for the sharing economy between SMEs. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11, 10.  Google Scholar
  40. Cho, M., Lee, K., Choi, H., Hong, S., Park, C., Kim, H. (2013): Introduction strategy of inter-corporate sharing economy for small businesses competitiveness reinforcement. International Conference on Business Administration, 109–118.  Google Scholar
  41. Bratianu, C. (2018): The Crazy New World of the Sharing Economy. In: E.-M. Vatamanescu & F. M. Pînzaru (Hrsg.), Knowledge Management in the Sharing Economy: Cross-Sectoral Insights into the Future of Competitive Advantage (S. 3–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66890-1_1.  Google Scholar
  42. Bower, J. L. (2017): Managing Resource Allocation: Personal Reflections From a Managerial Perspective. Journal of Management, 43(8), 2421–2429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675929.  Google Scholar
  43. Binder, C., Schäffer, U. (2005): Die Entwicklung des Controllings von 1970 bis 2003 im Spiegel von Publikationen in deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 65(6), 603–626. ABI/INFORM Global; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS).  Google Scholar
  44. Bhat, S., Gijo, E. V., Rego, A. M., Bhat, V. S. (2020): Lean Six Sigma competitiveness for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME): An action research in the Indian context. The TQM Journal, 33(2), 379–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0079.  Google Scholar
  45. Becker, W., Ulrich, P., Baltzer, B. (2022): Status Quo der Controlling-Lehre in Deutschland. In: W. Becker und P. Ulrich (Hrsg.), Handbuch Controlling (S. 29–42). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26431-4_2.  Google Scholar
  46. Becker, W., Lutz, S., Back, C. (2011): Gabler Kompaktlexikon modernes Rechnungswesen: 2.000 Begriffe nachschlagen, verstehen, anwenden (3., überarb. Aufl). Gabler.  Google Scholar

Abstract

How do SMEs identify suitable resources for business-to-business sharing?

Business-to-business sharing, and in particular the strategic sharing of operational resources between small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), is still underdeveloped, yet a promising opportunity. In most cases, such resources are discovered rather accidentally, as it is precisely the systematic identification of resources suitable for B2B sharing that represents a major hurdle. The identification of suitable resources is, however, a prerequisite for sharing between companies to emerge at all. In close cooperation with a group of selected Swiss SMEs, a structured approach was developed to identify resources suitable for sharing on the basis of materiality and divisibility using readily available data from financial accounting. This cross-industry approach allows to identify suitable resources with little effort and thus create the preconditions to seize the benefits from B2B sharing.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Mischa Steiner / Sebastian Huber / Viviane Trachsel: Wie identifizieren KMU geeignete Ressourcen für Business-to-Business-Sharing? 151
Zusammenfassung 151
Abstract 152
I. Einleitung 152
II. Theoretischer Hintergrund 154
1. Unternehmensressourcen in der B2B-Sharing Economy 154
2. Identifikation von Ressourcen aus Daten des Rechnungswesens 155
3. Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Eignung für ein Sharing 155
4. Aktionsforschung 156
III. Empirische Ergebnisse 157
1. Studiendesign 157
2. Prozess zur Identifikation von für das Sharing geeigneten Ressourcen in KMU 160
IV. Diskussion 162
1. Kritische Würdigung der angewandten Forschungsmethodik 162
2. Fazit und Ausblick 163
Literaturverzeichnis 164

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.