Menu Expand
  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Der Betriebswirt
  4. Vol. 64, Issue 1
  5. pp. 69–81

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Deckert, C., Schomaker, R., Hafizi, M. Zeit ist Geld … und Innovation – Wie sich das Lebenstempo auf das nationale Entrepreneurship auswirkt. Der Betriebswirt, 64(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.64.1.69
Deckert, Carsten; Schomaker, Rahel and Hafizi, Meggi "Zeit ist Geld … und Innovation – Wie sich das Lebenstempo auf das nationale Entrepreneurship auswirkt" Der Betriebswirt 64.1, 2023, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.64.1.69
Deckert, Carsten/Schomaker, Rahel/Hafizi, Meggi (2023): Zeit ist Geld … und Innovation – Wie sich das Lebenstempo auf das nationale Entrepreneurship auswirkt, in: Der Betriebswirt, vol. 64, iss. 1, 69-81, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.64.1.69
Format
Download

Zeit ist Geld … und Innovation – Wie sich das Lebenstempo auf das nationale Entrepreneurship auswirkt

Deckert, Carsten | Schomaker, Rahel | Hafizi, Meggi

Der Betriebswirt, Vol. 64 (2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 69–81

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot, Deutscher Betriebswirte-Verlag GmbH
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.64.1.69
Language
German
Pages
13

Pricing

Individual
€ 19.50 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Deckert, Carsten

  • Carsten Deckert ist an der Hochschule Düsseldorf (HSD) als Professor für Innovations- und Produktionsmanagement tätig. Seine Forschungsschwerpunkte liegen im Bereich nachhaltige Logistik, Kreativität im Ingenieurstudium und kulturelle Einflüsse auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit.
  • Search in Google Scholar

Schomaker, Rahel

  • Rahel M. Schomaker ist Professorin an der CUAS Villach und zudem Senior Fellow am Deutschen Forschungsinstitut für Öffentliche Verwaltung in Speyer. Ihre Forschungsschwerpunkte liegen auf Transformationsprozessen in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, Internationalisierung und Europäisierung sowie formellen und informellen Governancestrukturen und Netzwerken.
  • Search in Google Scholar

Hafizi, Meggi

  • Meggi Hafizi hat Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen mit dem Schwerpunkt Maschinenbau an der Hochschule Düsseldorf (HSD) studiert und arbeitet nun als Projektingenieurin für die Infrastruktur bei der Deutschen Bahn Netz AG.
  • Search in Google Scholar

References

  1. Acemoglu, D./Robinson, J. A. (2013): Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.  Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. (2006): How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? Innovations, winter, 97–107.  Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z./Szerb, L./Lafuente, E./Lloyd, A. (2018): Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018. Berlin: Springer.  Google Scholar
  4. Bonetto, E./Pichot, N./Adam-Troian, J. (2022): The Role of Cultural Values in National-Level Innovation: Evidence from 106 Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 0(0) 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/10693971221078087.  Google Scholar
  5. Brodbeck, F. C. (2016): Internationale Führung. Das GLOBE-Brevier in der Praxis. Berlin u.a.: Springer.  Google Scholar
  6. Cox, P. L./Khan, R. H. (2017): Country Culture and National Innovation. Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 85–101.  Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997): Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperPerennial.  Google Scholar
  8. De Vries, J. (1994): The industrial revolution and the industrious revolution. Journal of Economic History, 54 (2), 249–270.  Google Scholar
  9. Deckert, C./Nyssen Guillén, V. I. (2017): Kulturelle Einflüsse auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit – Zusammenhang zwischen den Hofstede-Dimensionen und dem Innovationsindex GII. WiSt – Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 46 (7–8), 25–31.  Google Scholar
  10. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2018): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal. Cross-Cultural Research. 53 (2), 186–214. DOI: 10.1177/1069397118799700.  Google Scholar
  11. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2019): Kultur und Innovation – Wie sich kulturelle Faktoren auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit auswirken. Der Betriebswirt. Bd. 60 (2019), Heft 2: S. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.60.2.18.  Google Scholar
  12. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2020): Culture and Entrepreneurship – The Political, Social and Individual Influences on Opportunity Entrepreneurs. (Working Papers in Industrial Engineering No. 3). Düsseldorf, University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.20385/2627-8375_3.  Google Scholar
  13. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2022): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness and Entrepreneurship. In: Poznanska, K./Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K./ Michalek, J. (eds.). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice. Dabrowa Gornicza: WSB University.  Google Scholar
  14. Faschingbauer, M. (2010): Effectuation. Wie erfolgreiche Unternehmer denken, entscheiden und handeln. Stuttgart: Schäfer-Poeschel.  Google Scholar
  15. Furman, J. L./Porter, M. E./Stern, S. (2002): The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy. 31 (2002), 899–933.  Google Scholar
  16. Hall, E. T. (1989): The Dance of Life. The Other Dimension of Time. New York: Random House.  Google Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G. H. (2003): Culture‘s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  18. Hofstede, G./Hofstede, G. J. (2006): Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management (3. Aufl.). München: dtv.  Google Scholar
  19. House, R. J./Hanges, P. J./Javidan, M./Dorfmann, P. W./Gupta, V. (2004): Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  20. Kuratko, D. F./Fisher, G./Audretsch, D. B. (2020): Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset. Small Business Economics. (2021) 57:1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00372-6.  Google Scholar
  21. Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (2003): Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  22. Levine, R. (2001): Eine Landkarte der Zeit. Wie Kulturen mit Zeit umgehen. München: Piper.  Google Scholar
  23. Levine, R./Norenzayan, A. (1999): The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 30 (2), 178–204.  Google Scholar
  24. Lubart, T. (2010): Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Creativity. In: Kaufman, J. C./Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (265–278). New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  25. McGrath, R. G./MacMillan, I. (2000): The Entrepreneurial Mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, E. (2014): The Culture Map. Decoding how people think, lead, and get things done across cultures. New York: Public Affairs.  Google Scholar
  27. North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  28. Nyssen Guillén, V. I./Deckert, C. (2021): Cultural influence on innovativeness – links between „The Culture Map“ and the „Global Innovation Index“. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 6 (7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00061-x.  Google Scholar
  29. OECD (2018): Oslo Manual. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (4th ed.). Paris: OECD.  Google Scholar
  30. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008): Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  31. Schomaker, R. M./Deckert, C. (2020): Wachstum, Entwicklung und Governance: Zur Interdependenz von Regierungsführung und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung. In: Leschke, M./Otter, N. (Hrsg.), Wachstum und Entwicklung: Globale Instabilitäten und neue wirtschaftspolitische Konzepte. München: De Gruyter (Schriftenreihe zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft; 106).  Google Scholar
  32. Smith, A. (1996): Vorlesungen über Rechts- und Staatswissenschaften. Sankt Augustin: Academia.  Google Scholar
  33. Szerb. L./Komlosi, E./Pager, B. (2016): Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union. CESinfo DICE Report, 3/2016 (September), 8–23.  Google Scholar
  34. Trantow, S./Hees, F./Jeschke, S. (2011): Die Fähigkeit zur Innovation – Einleitung in den Sammelband, in: Jeschke, S./Isenhardt, I./Hees, F./Trantow, S. (Hrsg.). Enabling Innovation: Innovationsfähigkeit – deutsche und internationale Perspektiven. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
  35. Trompenaars, F./Hampden-Turner, C. (2020): Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  36. Youngsun, J./Youngjoo, K./So Young, K. (2016): Cultural correlates of national innovative capacity: a cross-national analysis of national culture and innovation rates. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2 (23). DOI 10.1186/s40852-016-0048-6.  Google Scholar
  37. Zhao, H./Seibert, S. E. (2006): The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99 (2), 259–271.  Google Scholar
  38. Acemoglu, D./Robinson, J. A. (2013): Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.  Google Scholar
  39. Acs, Z. (2006): How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? Innovations, winter, 97–107.  Google Scholar
  40. Acs, Z./Szerb, L./Lafuente, E./Lloyd, A. (2018): Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018. Berlin: Springer.  Google Scholar
  41. Bonetto, E./Pichot, N./Adam-Troian, J. (2022): The Role of Cultural Values in National-Level Innovation: Evidence from 106 Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 0(0) 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/10693971221078087.  Google Scholar
  42. Brodbeck, F. C. (2016): Internationale Führung. Das GLOBE-Brevier in der Praxis. Berlin u.a.: Springer.  Google Scholar
  43. Cox, P. L./Khan, R. H. (2017): Country Culture and National Innovation. Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 85–101.  Google Scholar
  44. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997): Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperPerennial.  Google Scholar
  45. De Vries, J. (1994): The industrial revolution and the industrious revolution. Journal of Economic History, 54 (2), 249–270.  Google Scholar
  46. Deckert, C./Nyssen Guillén, V. I. (2017): Kulturelle Einflüsse auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit – Zusammenhang zwischen den Hofstede-Dimensionen und dem Innovationsindex GII. WiSt – Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 46 (7–8), 25–31.  Google Scholar
  47. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2018): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal. Cross-Cultural Research. 53 (2), 186–214. DOI: 10.1177/1069397118799700.  Google Scholar
  48. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2019): Kultur und Innovation – Wie sich kulturelle Faktoren auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit auswirken. Der Betriebswirt. Bd. 60 (2019), Heft 2: S. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.60.2.18.  Google Scholar
  49. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2020): Culture and Entrepreneurship – The Political, Social and Individual Influences on Opportunity Entrepreneurs. (Working Papers in Industrial Engineering No. 3). Düsseldorf, University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.20385/2627-8375_3.  Google Scholar
  50. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2022): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness and Entrepreneurship. In: Poznanska, K./Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K./ Michalek, J. (eds.). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice. Dabrowa Gornicza: WSB University.  Google Scholar
  51. Faschingbauer, M. (2010): Effectuation. Wie erfolgreiche Unternehmer denken, entscheiden und handeln. Stuttgart: Schäfer-Poeschel.  Google Scholar
  52. Furman, J. L./Porter, M. E./Stern, S. (2002): The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy. 31 (2002), 899–933.  Google Scholar
  53. Hall, E. T. (1989): The Dance of Life. The Other Dimension of Time. New York: Random House.  Google Scholar
  54. Hofstede, G. H. (2003): Culture‘s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  55. Hofstede, G./Hofstede, G. J. (2006): Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management (3. Aufl.). München: dtv.  Google Scholar
  56. House, R. J./Hanges, P. J./Javidan, M./Dorfmann, P. W./Gupta, V. (2004): Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  57. Kuratko, D. F./Fisher, G./Audretsch, D. B. (2020): Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset. Small Business Economics. (2021) 57:1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00372-6.  Google Scholar
  58. Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (2003): Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  59. Levine, R. (2001): Eine Landkarte der Zeit. Wie Kulturen mit Zeit umgehen. München: Piper.  Google Scholar
  60. Levine, R./Norenzayan, A. (1999): The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 30 (2), 178–204.  Google Scholar
  61. Lubart, T. (2010): Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Creativity. In: Kaufman, J. C./Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (265–278). New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  62. McGrath, R. G./MacMillan, I. (2000): The Entrepreneurial Mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.  Google Scholar
  63. Meyer, E. (2014): The Culture Map. Decoding how people think, lead, and get things done across cultures. New York: Public Affairs.  Google Scholar
  64. North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  65. Nyssen Guillén, V. I./Deckert, C. (2021): Cultural influence on innovativeness – links between „The Culture Map“ and the „Global Innovation Index“. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 6 (7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00061-x.  Google Scholar
  66. OECD (2018): Oslo Manual. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (4th ed.). Paris: OECD.  Google Scholar
  67. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008): Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  68. Schomaker, R. M./Deckert, C. (2020): Wachstum, Entwicklung und Governance: Zur Interdependenz von Regierungsführung und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung. In: Leschke, M./Otter, N. (Hrsg.), Wachstum und Entwicklung: Globale Instabilitäten und neue wirtschaftspolitische Konzepte. München: De Gruyter (Schriftenreihe zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft; 106).  Google Scholar
  69. Smith, A. (1996): Vorlesungen über Rechts- und Staatswissenschaften. Sankt Augustin: Academia.  Google Scholar
  70. Szerb. L./Komlosi, E./Pager, B. (2016): Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union. CESinfo DICE Report, 3/2016 (September), 8–23.  Google Scholar
  71. Trantow, S./Hees, F./Jeschke, S. (2011): Die Fähigkeit zur Innovation – Einleitung in den Sammelband, in: Jeschke, S./Isenhardt, I./Hees, F./Trantow, S. (Hrsg.). Enabling Innovation: Innovationsfähigkeit – deutsche und internationale Perspektiven. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
  72. Trompenaars, F./Hampden-Turner, C. (2020): Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  73. Youngsun, J./Youngjoo, K./So Young, K. (2016): Cultural correlates of national innovative capacity: a cross-national analysis of national culture and innovation rates. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2 (23). DOI 10.1186/s40852-016-0048-6.  Google Scholar
  74. Zhao, H./Seibert, S. E. (2006): The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99 (2), 259–271.  Google Scholar
  75. Acemoglu, D./Robinson, J. A. (2013): Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.  Google Scholar
  76. Acs, Z. (2006): How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? Innovations, winter, 97–107.  Google Scholar
  77. Acs, Z./Szerb, L./Lafuente, E./Lloyd, A. (2018): Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018. Berlin: Springer.  Google Scholar
  78. Bonetto, E./Pichot, N./Adam-Troian, J. (2022): The Role of Cultural Values in National-Level Innovation: Evidence from 106 Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 0(0) 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/10693971221078087.  Google Scholar
  79. Brodbeck, F. C. (2016): Internationale Führung. Das GLOBE-Brevier in der Praxis. Berlin u.a.: Springer.  Google Scholar
  80. Cox, P. L./Khan, R. H. (2017): Country Culture and National Innovation. Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 85–101.  Google Scholar
  81. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997): Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperPerennial.  Google Scholar
  82. De Vries, J. (1994): The industrial revolution and the industrious revolution. Journal of Economic History, 54 (2), 249–270.  Google Scholar
  83. Deckert, C./Nyssen Guillén, V. I. (2017): Kulturelle Einflüsse auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit – Zusammenhang zwischen den Hofstede-Dimensionen und dem Innovationsindex GII. WiSt – Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 46 (7–8), 25–31.  Google Scholar
  84. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2018): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal. Cross-Cultural Research. 53 (2), 186–214. DOI: 10.1177/1069397118799700.  Google Scholar
  85. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2019): Kultur und Innovation – Wie sich kulturelle Faktoren auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit auswirken. Der Betriebswirt. Bd. 60 (2019), Heft 2: S. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.60.2.18.  Google Scholar
  86. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2020): Culture and Entrepreneurship – The Political, Social and Individual Influences on Opportunity Entrepreneurs. (Working Papers in Industrial Engineering No. 3). Düsseldorf, University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.20385/2627-8375_3.  Google Scholar
  87. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2022): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness and Entrepreneurship. In: Poznanska, K./Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K./ Michalek, J. (eds.). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice. Dabrowa Gornicza: WSB University.  Google Scholar
  88. Faschingbauer, M. (2010): Effectuation. Wie erfolgreiche Unternehmer denken, entscheiden und handeln. Stuttgart: Schäfer-Poeschel.  Google Scholar
  89. Furman, J. L./Porter, M. E./Stern, S. (2002): The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy. 31 (2002), 899–933.  Google Scholar
  90. Hall, E. T. (1989): The Dance of Life. The Other Dimension of Time. New York: Random House.  Google Scholar
  91. Hofstede, G. H. (2003): Culture‘s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  92. Hofstede, G./Hofstede, G. J. (2006): Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management (3. Aufl.). München: dtv.  Google Scholar
  93. House, R. J./Hanges, P. J./Javidan, M./Dorfmann, P. W./Gupta, V. (2004): Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  94. Kuratko, D. F./Fisher, G./Audretsch, D. B. (2020): Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset. Small Business Economics. (2021) 57:1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00372-6.  Google Scholar
  95. Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (2003): Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  96. Levine, R. (2001): Eine Landkarte der Zeit. Wie Kulturen mit Zeit umgehen. München: Piper.  Google Scholar
  97. Levine, R./Norenzayan, A. (1999): The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 30 (2), 178–204.  Google Scholar
  98. Lubart, T. (2010): Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Creativity. In: Kaufman, J. C./Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (265–278). New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  99. McGrath, R. G./MacMillan, I. (2000): The Entrepreneurial Mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.  Google Scholar
  100. Meyer, E. (2014): The Culture Map. Decoding how people think, lead, and get things done across cultures. New York: Public Affairs.  Google Scholar
  101. North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  102. Nyssen Guillén, V. I./Deckert, C. (2021): Cultural influence on innovativeness – links between „The Culture Map“ and the „Global Innovation Index“. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 6 (7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00061-x.  Google Scholar
  103. OECD (2018): Oslo Manual. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (4th ed.). Paris: OECD.  Google Scholar
  104. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008): Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  105. Schomaker, R. M./Deckert, C. (2020): Wachstum, Entwicklung und Governance: Zur Interdependenz von Regierungsführung und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung. In: Leschke, M./Otter, N. (Hrsg.), Wachstum und Entwicklung: Globale Instabilitäten und neue wirtschaftspolitische Konzepte. München: De Gruyter (Schriftenreihe zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft; 106).  Google Scholar
  106. Smith, A. (1996): Vorlesungen über Rechts- und Staatswissenschaften. Sankt Augustin: Academia.  Google Scholar
  107. Szerb. L./Komlosi, E./Pager, B. (2016): Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union. CESinfo DICE Report, 3/2016 (September), 8–23.  Google Scholar
  108. Trantow, S./Hees, F./Jeschke, S. (2011): Die Fähigkeit zur Innovation – Einleitung in den Sammelband, in: Jeschke, S./Isenhardt, I./Hees, F./Trantow, S. (Hrsg.). Enabling Innovation: Innovationsfähigkeit – deutsche und internationale Perspektiven. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
  109. Trompenaars, F./Hampden-Turner, C. (2020): Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  110. Youngsun, J./Youngjoo, K./So Young, K. (2016): Cultural correlates of national innovative capacity: a cross-national analysis of national culture and innovation rates. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2 (23). DOI 10.1186/s40852-016-0048-6.  Google Scholar
  111. Zhao, H./Seibert, S. E. (2006): The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99 (2), 259–271.  Google Scholar
  112. Acemoglu, D./Robinson, J. A. (2013): Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.  Google Scholar
  113. Acs, Z. (2006): How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? Innovations, winter, 97–107.  Google Scholar
  114. Acs, Z./Szerb, L./Lafuente, E./Lloyd, A. (2018): Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018. Berlin: Springer.  Google Scholar
  115. Bonetto, E./Pichot, N./Adam-Troian, J. (2022): The Role of Cultural Values in National-Level Innovation: Evidence from 106 Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 0(0) 1–16. DOI: 10.1177/10693971221078087.  Google Scholar
  116. Brodbeck, F. C. (2016): Internationale Führung. Das GLOBE-Brevier in der Praxis. Berlin u.a.: Springer.  Google Scholar
  117. Cox, P. L./Khan, R. H. (2017): Country Culture and National Innovation. Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 85–101.  Google Scholar
  118. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997): Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperPerennial.  Google Scholar
  119. De Vries, J. (1994): The industrial revolution and the industrious revolution. Journal of Economic History, 54 (2), 249–270.  Google Scholar
  120. Deckert, C./Nyssen Guillén, V. I. (2017): Kulturelle Einflüsse auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit – Zusammenhang zwischen den Hofstede-Dimensionen und dem Innovationsindex GII. WiSt – Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 46 (7–8), 25–31.  Google Scholar
  121. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2018): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness: Not Every Cultural Dimension Is Equal. Cross-Cultural Research. 53 (2), 186–214. DOI: 10.1177/1069397118799700.  Google Scholar
  122. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M. (2019): Kultur und Innovation – Wie sich kulturelle Faktoren auf die nationale Innovationsfähigkeit auswirken. Der Betriebswirt. Bd. 60 (2019), Heft 2: S. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.60.2.18.  Google Scholar
  123. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2020): Culture and Entrepreneurship – The Political, Social and Individual Influences on Opportunity Entrepreneurs. (Working Papers in Industrial Engineering No. 3). Düsseldorf, University of Applied Sciences. DOI: 10.20385/2627-8375_3.  Google Scholar
  124. Deckert, C./Schomaker, R. M./Knappitsch, E. (2022): Cultural Impacts on National Innovativeness and Entrepreneurship. In: Poznanska, K./Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K./ Michalek, J. (eds.). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice. Dabrowa Gornicza: WSB University.  Google Scholar
  125. Faschingbauer, M. (2010): Effectuation. Wie erfolgreiche Unternehmer denken, entscheiden und handeln. Stuttgart: Schäfer-Poeschel.  Google Scholar
  126. Furman, J. L./Porter, M. E./Stern, S. (2002): The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy. 31 (2002), 899–933.  Google Scholar
  127. Hall, E. T. (1989): The Dance of Life. The Other Dimension of Time. New York: Random House.  Google Scholar
  128. Hofstede, G. H. (2003): Culture‘s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  129. Hofstede, G./Hofstede, G. J. (2006): Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management (3. Aufl.). München: dtv.  Google Scholar
  130. House, R. J./Hanges, P. J./Javidan, M./Dorfmann, P. W./Gupta, V. (2004): Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks u.a.: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  131. Kuratko, D. F./Fisher, G./Audretsch, D. B. (2020): Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset. Small Business Economics. (2021) 57:1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00372-6.  Google Scholar
  132. Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (2003): Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  133. Levine, R. (2001): Eine Landkarte der Zeit. Wie Kulturen mit Zeit umgehen. München: Piper.  Google Scholar
  134. Levine, R./Norenzayan, A. (1999): The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 30 (2), 178–204.  Google Scholar
  135. Lubart, T. (2010): Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Creativity. In: Kaufman, J. C./Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (265–278). New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  136. McGrath, R. G./MacMillan, I. (2000): The Entrepreneurial Mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.  Google Scholar
  137. Meyer, E. (2014): The Culture Map. Decoding how people think, lead, and get things done across cultures. New York: Public Affairs.  Google Scholar
  138. North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  139. Nyssen Guillén, V. I./Deckert, C. (2021): Cultural influence on innovativeness – links between „The Culture Map“ and the „Global Innovation Index“. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 6 (7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00061-x.  Google Scholar
  140. OECD (2018): Oslo Manual. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (4th ed.). Paris: OECD.  Google Scholar
  141. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008): Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  142. Schomaker, R. M./Deckert, C. (2020): Wachstum, Entwicklung und Governance: Zur Interdependenz von Regierungsführung und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung. In: Leschke, M./Otter, N. (Hrsg.), Wachstum und Entwicklung: Globale Instabilitäten und neue wirtschaftspolitische Konzepte. München: De Gruyter (Schriftenreihe zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft; 106).  Google Scholar
  143. Smith, A. (1996): Vorlesungen über Rechts- und Staatswissenschaften. Sankt Augustin: Academia.  Google Scholar
  144. Szerb. L./Komlosi, E./Pager, B. (2016): Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union. CESinfo DICE Report, 3/2016 (September), 8–23.  Google Scholar
  145. Trantow, S./Hees, F./Jeschke, S. (2011): Die Fähigkeit zur Innovation – Einleitung in den Sammelband, in: Jeschke, S./Isenhardt, I./Hees, F./Trantow, S. (Hrsg.). Enabling Innovation: Innovationsfähigkeit – deutsche und internationale Perspektiven. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
  146. Trompenaars, F./Hampden-Turner, C. (2020): Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  147. Youngsun, J./Youngjoo, K./So Young, K. (2016): Cultural correlates of national innovative capacity: a cross-national analysis of national culture and innovation rates. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2 (23). DOI 10.1186/s40852-016-0048-6.  Google Scholar
  148. Zhao, H./Seibert, S. E. (2006): The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99 (2), 259–271.  Google Scholar

Abstract

The meaning of time varies culturally, but in any case it has an influence not only on individual behavior but also on economic activities. The respective understanding of time may also impact a country’s innovation activities, as the understanding of time is a prerequisite for the realistic discounting of future payments and for the postponement of individual need satisfaction. Time perception also affects the way activities are planned and managed. Based on theoretical thoughts, this paper examines the impact of the cultural understanding of time on a country’s innovative capacity and entrepreneurship, and presents own estimations depicting the impact of the pace of life on national entrepreneurship.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Carsten Deckert, Rahel Schomaker und Meggi Hafizi; Zeit ist Geld … und Innovation – Wie sich das Lebenstempo auf das nationale Entrepreneurship auswirkt 1
Abstract 1
Zusammenfassung 2
1. Zum Hintergrund 2
2. Kulturelle Konzepte der Zeit 3
3. Entrepreneurship 4
4. Zeit und Innovation 6
5. Empirische Ergebnisse 7
6. Fazit 10
Quellen 11

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.