Menu Expand

Foreword to the Translation of Gustav Schmoller’s Reviews of Carl Menger’s “Principles,” “Investigations,” and “Errors”

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Horn, K., Kolev, S. Foreword to the Translation of Gustav Schmoller’s Reviews of Carl Menger’s “Principles,” “Investigations,” and “Errors”. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 141(4), 317-320. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.4.317
Horn, Karen and Kolev, Stefan "Foreword to the Translation of Gustav Schmoller’s Reviews of Carl Menger’s “Principles,” “Investigations,” and “Errors”" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 141.4, 2021, 317-320. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.4.317
Horn, Karen/Kolev, Stefan (2021): Foreword to the Translation of Gustav Schmoller’s Reviews of Carl Menger’s “Principles,” “Investigations,” and “Errors”, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 141, iss. 4, 317-320, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.4.317

Format

Foreword to the Translation of Gustav Schmoller’s Reviews of Carl Menger’s “Principles,” “Investigations,” and “Errors”

Horn, Karen | Kolev, Stefan

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 141 (2021), Iss. 4 : pp. 317–320

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Karen Horn, Faculty of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, University of Erfurt. Nordhäuser Str. 63,99089 Erfurt, Germany.

Stefan Kolev, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Applied Sciences Zwickau. Kornmarkt 1, 08056 Zwickau, Germany.

References

  1. Caldwell, B. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge. An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Dilthey, W. 1883. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte. Translated as Dilthey, W. 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences, edited by R. A. Makkreel and F. Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  3. Herold, J. 2019. Der junge Gustav Schmoller. Sozialwissenschaft und Liberalkonservatismus im 19. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.  Google Scholar
  4. Horn, K. and S. Kolev. 2020. “Dispute on Method or Dispute on Institutional Context? Foreword to the Translation of Carl Menger’s ‘Errors of Historicism.’” Econ Journal Watch 17 (2): 442 – 57.  Google Scholar
  5. Kolev, S. and E. Dekker. 2023. “Carl Menger’s Smithian Contributions to German Political Economy.” Review of Austrian Economics 36 (2): 247 – 69.  Google Scholar
  6. Menger, C. (1871) 1950. Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller. Translated as Menger, C. 1950. Principles of Economics, edited by J. Dingwall and B. F. Hoselitz. New York: The Free Press.  Google Scholar
  7. Menger, C. (1883) 1985. Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. Translated as Menger, C. 1963. Problems of Economics and Sociology, edited by L. Schneider. Reprinted with a New Introduction by L. H. White as Menger, C. 1985. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York: New York University.  Google Scholar
  8. Menger, C. (1884) 2020. Die Irrthümer des Historismus in der Deutschen Nationalökonomie. Vienna: Alfred Hölder. Translated as Menger, C. 2020. The Errors of Historicism in German Economics, edited by K. Horn and S. Kolev. Econ Journal Watch 17 (2): 461 – 506.  Google Scholar
  9. Schmoller, G. 1873. “Menger, Dr. Carl, Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre. 1. Allgem. Theil. Wien 1872. Braumüller (XII, 285 S. gr. 8).” Literarisches Centralblatt für Deutschland February 1: 142 – 3.  Google Scholar
  10. Schmoller, G. 1883. “Zur Methodologie der Staats- und Sozialwissenschaften.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich 7 (3): 975 – 94.  Google Scholar
  11. Schmoller, G. 1884. “Menger, Dr. Karl, Die Irrthümer des Historismus in der Deutschen Nationalökonomie. Wien: Hölder. 8. 87 S.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich 8 (2): 677.  Google Scholar