Menu Expand

The Mask of Dimitrios: Objective and Subjective Approaches to judicial Enforcement of International Law on Common Interests

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Röben, V. The Mask of Dimitrios: Objective and Subjective Approaches to judicial Enforcement of International Law on Common Interests. German Yearbook of International Law, 65(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.296388
Röben, Volker "The Mask of Dimitrios: Objective and Subjective Approaches to judicial Enforcement of International Law on Common Interests" German Yearbook of International Law 65.1, 2024, 109-128. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.296388
Röben, Volker (2024): The Mask of Dimitrios: Objective and Subjective Approaches to judicial Enforcement of International Law on Common Interests, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 65, iss. 1, 109-128, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.296388

Format

The Mask of Dimitrios: Objective and Subjective Approaches to judicial Enforcement of International Law on Common Interests

Röben, Volker

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 65 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 109–128

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Röben, Volker

Abstract

Abstract: This article conceptualises a novel objective-institutional approach to judicial enforcement of multilateral treaty where non-compliance by a State party threatens the underlying common interest. This objective approach drives a re-interpretation of the doctrines of international judicial procedure with the aim that any party can institute proceedings and secure compliance with the objective law. It drives re-interpretations of the procedural doctrines of jurisdiction, dispute, party and standing without regard to any subjective considerations. It rests on institutional interpretation and application of the substantive treaty through advisory opinions, United Nations General Assembly resolutions, and findings of United Nations’ Human Rights or other technical bodies. The article argues that, at the same time, the traditional subjective approach to judicial enforcement acquires a new role. This traditional subjective approach that enforces rights of States can be reconciled with the objective-institutional approach if States use their primary and secondary rights to secure compliance by others with obligations under multilateral treaties. The article develops this complementarity by reference to the International Court of Justice decisions in The Gambia v Myanmar and Ukraine v Russia under the Genocide Convention. It then applies it to other international law on common interests in the oceans, the environment, and international criminal justice and discusses the relating jurisprudence of specialist courts and tribunals.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Volker Röben\nThe Mask of Dimitrios: Objective and Subjective Approaches to judicial Enforcement of International Law on Common Interests 109
I. Introduction 109
II. The Objective Approach to Judicial Enforcement and Procedure 112
III. The Subjective Approach 116
IV. Applying the Complementarity of the Objective and the Subjective Approaches to Judicial Enforcement Beyond the Convention 118
V. Judicial Enforcement and the Role of States 126
VI. Conclusions 127