Menu Expand

International Organisation as Government: Rereading Georges Scelle’s Theory of International Government

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Chaib, A. International Organisation as Government: Rereading Georges Scelle’s Theory of International Government. German Yearbook of International Law, 65(1), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.296392
Chaib, André Nunes "International Organisation as Government: Rereading Georges Scelle’s Theory of International Government" German Yearbook of International Law 65.1, 2024, 225-254. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.296392
Chaib, André Nunes (2024): International Organisation as Government: Rereading Georges Scelle’s Theory of International Government, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 65, iss. 1, 225-254, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.296392

Format

International Organisation as Government: Rereading Georges Scelle’s Theory of International Government

Chaib, André Nunes

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 65 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 225–254

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Chaib, André Nunes

Abstract

Abstract: International organisations have, in different aspects, become important entities in securing some degree of stability of the international social order. Institutions have the function to sort out and execute their constitutional functions and exert a broader influence on the social order, one that guarantees that different social agents’ legal positions and competence are appropriately secured in the society in which they operate. Georges Scelle saw this function as a function of government, and he associated it with the activities of an executive. Together with judicial institutions, which guarantee the proper functioning of the legal order, international organisations maintain the material security of the social agents, the States, so they can fully achieve their social objectives. This article aims at revisiting Scelle’s argument about the theory of international government and, in light of his broader international legal sociology, to evaluate and examine the role international organisations play nowadays in respect of States and local populations more broadly. For Scelle, the relation between social functions and the legal organisation of competences is integral to forming a proper legal order. This article hopes to contribute to the debate on how international organisations simulate government action by taking inspiration from Georges Scelle’s theory of international government, espoused in his report to Institut de Droit International in 1934: Théorie du Gouvernement International. In doing so, the article will provide an intellectual history of Scelle’s contribution to the development of international organisations’ position within international law. It also hopes to answer the question of how international organisations differentiate their actions from domestic public administrations and contribute to the debate about functionalism and autonomy of international organisations.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
André Nunes Chaib\nInternational Organisation as Government: Rereading Georges Scelle’s Theory of International Government 225
I. Introduction 226
II. Georges Scelle and the Fundamentals of his International Legal Project 229
A. French Public Law Scholarship Influence on Scelle’s Legal Theory 229
B. The Political Underpinnings of Scelle’s Political and Legal Position 231
C. The Basic Tenets of Scelle’s Legal Philosophy 232
III. The Criteria and Conditions for International Government According to Scelle 234
A. International Organisations and Social Justice: The Basic Foundations of Solidarity 234
B. The Constitution of International Society and Government 238
C. On How International Society Can Be Organised 241
IV. The Functions of International Government and the Role of International Organisations 244
A. The Limits of International Organisations to Act as Government 244
B. International Organisations as Public Service: Serving the General Interest of International Society? 248
C. International Government as Intervention and Control 250
V. Concluding Remarks 253