JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Greppler, C. The Return of the Benin Bronzes from Germany on the Significance of the Joint Declaration between Germany and Nigeria in Light of European Restitution Practice. German Yearbook of International Law, 65(1), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.310692
Greppler, Celina S. Lubahn "The Return of the Benin Bronzes from Germany on the Significance of the Joint Declaration between Germany and Nigeria in Light of European Restitution Practice" German Yearbook of International Law 65.1, 2024, 367-374. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.310692
Greppler, Celina S. Lubahn (2024): The Return of the Benin Bronzes from Germany on the Significance of the Joint Declaration between Germany and Nigeria in Light of European Restitution Practice, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 65, iss. 1, 367-374, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.310692
Format
The Return of the Benin Bronzes from Germany on the Significance of the Joint Declaration between Germany and Nigeria in Light of European Restitution Practice
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 65 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 367–374
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Greppler, Celina S. Lubahn
Preview
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celina S. Lubahn Greppler\nThe Return of the Benin Bronzes from Germany on the Significance of the Joint Declaration between Germany and Nigeria in Light of European Restitution Practice | 1 | ||
| I. Introduction | 1 | ||
| II. The Joint Declaration on the Return of Benin Bronzes and Bilateral Museum Cooperation | 2 | ||
| A. Content, Legal Character, and Key Points of the Declaration | 3 | ||
| 1. The Quantity of Objects | 3 | ||
| 2. The Recognition of Injustice | 4 | ||
| 3. The Transfer of Ownership and Handover Process within a Federal System | 5 | ||
| B. The Declaration in Light of German Restitution Practice Since 1924 | 7 | ||
| C. The Current German Position | 13 | ||
| III. The Joint Declaration in a Bigger Picture: Expression of a Changing European State Practice and a Condensing International Cultural Heritage Law? | 14 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 17 |