Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Dagbanja, D. Developmental Constitutionalism and Treaty-based Investment Protection in Africa. German Yearbook of International Law, 65(1), 255-290. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.330035
Dagbanja, Dominic Npoanlari "Developmental Constitutionalism and Treaty-based Investment Protection in Africa" German Yearbook of International Law 65.1, 2024, 255-290. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.330035
Dagbanja, Dominic Npoanlari (2024): Developmental Constitutionalism and Treaty-based Investment Protection in Africa, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 65, iss. 1, 255-290, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2023.330035

Format

Developmental Constitutionalism and Treaty-based Investment Protection in Africa

Dagbanja, Dominic Npoanlari

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 65 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 255–290

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Dagbanja, Dominic Npoanlari

Abstract

Abstract: A key feature of constitutional governance in Africa is ‘developmental constitutionalism.’ National constitutions are development oriented and impose constitutional responsibilities on State institutions to ensure the realisation of development and to operate within constitutional limits. In this article, I analyse the constitutional right to development and corresponding duties of African States as specific examples of the content of the duty to regulate in the public interest. I also analyse recent international investment agreements (IIAs) with provisions purporting to preserve development policymaking autonomy to contest their assumed efficacy. I argue that the constitutional right to development and corresponding duties do place limitations on the competence of African States to conclude IIAs that limit their authority to regulate in furtherance of development objectives. I also argue that the reforms of IIAs do not, and are less likely to, achieve the objective of preserving regulatory autonomy for development policymaking because key elements constituting the reforms have merely acknowledged the duty to regulate and have failed to carve out areas of development policy that cannot be the subject of investment treaty arbitration. To reclaim development policymaking autonomy, investment treaty reforms must be related and undertaken with reference to the duty to regulate in specific cases of human rights (including the right to development) and must incorporate enforceable rights of States against multinational business entities.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Dominic Npoanlari Dagbanja\nDevelopmental Constitutionalism and Treaty-based Investment Protection in Africa 255
I. Introduction 256
II. Developmental Constitutionalism 260
A. Development Defined 260
B. The Right to Development in Africa 262
III. Foreign Direct Investment, Development and African Investment Treaty Regime 266
IV. National Constitutions and African Investment Treaty Regime 270
A. Developmental Constitutionalism and the Making of Investment Treaties in Africa 270
B. Challenging the Constitutionality of Investment Treaties in Africa 276
V. Development Policymaking in Investment Treaty Reforms in Africa 282
A. Development in Bilateral Investment Treaty Reforms in Africa 283
B. Development in Subregional and Continental Investment Treaty Reforms in Africa 284
VI. Conclusion 289