Menu Expand
  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung
  4. Vol. 92, Issue 4
  5. pp. 15–34

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Hassel, A., Weil, K. Social partners in the green transition of the EU. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 92(4), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.2023.334383
Hassel, Anke and Weil, Kilian "Social partners in the green transition of the EU" Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 92.4, 2023, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.2023.334383
Hassel, Anke/Weil, Kilian (2023): Social partners in the green transition of the EU, in: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 92, iss. 4, 15-34, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.2023.334383
Format
Download

Social partners in the green transition of the EU

Hassel, Anke | Weil, Kilian

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 92 (2023), Iss. 4 : pp. 15–34

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.2023.334383
Language
English
Pages
20
Keywords

Pricing

Individual
€ 19.50 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Anke Hassel, Hertie School

  • Anke Hassel ist Professorin für Public Policy an der Hertie School. Von 2016 bis 2019 war sie wissenschaftliche Direktorin des WSI der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Anke Hassel hat umfangreiche internationale Erfahrung und wissenschaftliche Expertise in den Bereichen Arbeitsmarkt, Sozialpartnerschaft, Mitbestimmung und der vergleichenden politischen Ökonomie entwickelter Industrienationen. Sie war Sachverständige der Enquetekommission Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität des deutschen Bundestags (2012 – 13); der Expertenkommission Arbeit der Zukunft der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung (2015 – 17) und Vorsitzende der Expertengruppe Workers’ Voice and Good Corporate Governance in transnationalen Companies in Europe (2015 – 2018). Sie ist zudem seit Januar 2019 Mitglied des Hightech-Forums der Bundesregierung. Ihre jüngsten Veröffentlichungen erschienen in Oxford University Press (Growth & Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies, 2021; How to do Public Policy, 2022).
  • Email
  • Search in Google Scholar

Kilian Weil, Hertie School

  • Kilian Weil ist Doktorand im Bereich Governance mit Interesse an der ökologischen Transformation von Arbeitsmärkten, industriellen Beziehungen und politischer Ökonomie. Seine empirische Forschung konzentriert sich darauf, die Faktoren zu identifizieren, die die Umstrukturierung von Arbeitsplätzen, die Polarisierung der Beschäftigung und Lohnstrukturen beeinflussen, und er untersucht, wie nationale Arbeitsmarktinstitutionen als Vermittler für diese Trends dienen. Vor der Hertie School, arbeitete er bei DG CONNECT im Bereich KI-Politik, beim Robert Koch-Institut im Bereich öffentliche Gesundheit und bei der OECD im Bereich results-based management. Er erhielt einen Bachelor in Soziologie und Politikwissenschaft von der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und einen Master of Arts in Soziologie von der Freien Universität Berlin.
  • Email
  • Search in Google Scholar

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2022): Demographics and automation. The Review of Economic Studies 89 (1), 1 – 44.  Google Scholar
  2. Addison, J. T. (2016): Collective Bargaining Systems and Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Flexibility: The Quest for Appropriate Institutional Forms in Advanced Economies. IZA Journal of Labor Policy 5 (19), 1 – 53.  Google Scholar
  3. Autor, D. (2015): Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3), 3 – 30.  Google Scholar
  4. Autor, D., Chin, C., Salomons, A. M., and Seegmiller, B. (2022): New frontiers: The origins and content of new work, 1940 – 2018. National Bureau of Economic Research.  Google Scholar
  5. Autor, D. H. (2019): Work of the past, work of the future. AEA Papers and Proceedings 109, 1 – 32.  Google Scholar
  6. Autor, D. H., Levy, F., and Murnane, R. J. (2003): The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4), 1279 – 1333.  Google Scholar
  7. Baccaro, L., Blyth, M., and Pontusson, J. (eds.) (2022): Diminishing Returns: The New Politics of Growth and Stagnation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Bednorz, J. et al. (2022): Unionisation and the twin transition. Good practices in collective action and employee involvement. Study for the Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies, PE 733.972 – September 2022.  Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard, O. J., Jaumotte, F., and Loungani, P. (2014): Labor Market Policies and IMF Advice in Advanced Economies during the Great Recession. IZA Journal of Labor Policy 3 (2), 1 – 23.  Google Scholar
  10. BMBF (2023): https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/de/forschung/zukunftsstrategie/innovation-strukturwandel/transformation-von-regionen_node.html.  Google Scholar
  11. Broome, M. et al. (2022): Net zero jobs: The impact of the transition to net zero on the UK labour market. The Resolution Foundation, June 2022.  Google Scholar
  12. Brulle, R. J. (2014): Institutionalizing Delay: Foundation Funding and the Creation of U.S. Climate Change Counter-Movement Organizations. Climatic Change 122 (4), 681 – 94. doi: 10.1007/s10584 – 013 – 1018 – 7.  Google Scholar
  13. Brulle, R. J. (2018): The Climate Lobby: A Sectoral Analysis of Lobbying Spending on Climate Change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Climatic Change 149 (3), 289 – 303. doi: 10.1007/s10584 – 018 – 2241-z.  Google Scholar
  14. Carmichael, J. T. and Brulle, R. J. (2017): Elite Cues, Media Coverage, and Public Concern: An Integrated Path Analysis of Public Opinion on Climate Change, 2001 – 2013. Environmental Politics 26 (2), 232 – 52. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433.  Google Scholar
  15. CEI-Bois, EFBWW (2020): Joint position paper on the renovation wave strategy. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=521&langId=en&agreementId=5692.  Google Scholar
  16. Chateau, J. and Mavroeidi, E. (2020): The jobs potential of a transition towards a resource efficient and circular economy. OECD Environment Working Papers No. 167.  Google Scholar
  17. Chetty, R., Jackson, M. O., Kuchler, T., Stroebel, J., Hendren, N., Fluegge, R. B., Gong, S., Gonzalez, F., Grondin, A., and Jacob, M. et al. (2022): Social capital I: measurement and associations with economic mobility. Nature 608 (7921), 108 – 121.  Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, L. and Lipsig-Mummé, C. (2020): Future conditional: From just transition to radical transformation?, European Journal of Industrial Relations 26 (4), 351 – 366.  Google Scholar
  19. Driscoll, D. and Blyth, M. (2024): Growth and Decarbonization: National Capacities Meet Global Imperatives. Paper prepared for Hassel, A. and Palier, B. (eds.), Growth strategies and welfare reforms: How nations cope with economic transitions.  Google Scholar
  20. EC (2021): A Socially Fair Transition. European Union.  Google Scholar
  21. EUROFER, IndustriAll (2021): A sustainable and just transition pathway for industry and workers. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=521&langId=en&agreementId=5765.  Google Scholar
  22. Eurogas, IndustriAll, EPSU (2020): Joint statement from the social partners of the European sectoral social dialogue on gas. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=521&langId=en&agreementId=5694.  Google Scholar
  23. European Environmental Agency (2022): Zero pollution monitoring assessment. Outlook and Report.  Google Scholar
  24. Farrell, J. (2016): Corporate Funding and Ideological Polarization about Climate Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (1), 92 – 97. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509433112.  Google Scholar
  25. Hassel, A. and Palier, B. (2021): Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies: How Have Growth Regimes Evolved? Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Hassel, A. and Palier, B. (2023): Same Trend, Different Paths: Growth and Welfare Regimes Across Time and Space. Annual Review of Political Science 26 (1), null. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921 – 103030.  Google Scholar
  27. Hassel, A., von Verschuer, S., and Helmerich, N. (2018): Workers’ voice and good corporate governance. Düsseldorf. Hans-Böckler-Foundation.  Google Scholar
  28. Hill, F. (2021): There is nothing for you here: Finding opportunity in the twenty-first century. Mariner Books.  Google Scholar
  29. IG Metall (2023): https://www.igmetall-bezirk-mitte.de/fileadmin/user/Transformation/Neue_Dateien/Erstes_Massnahmenpaket_Transformationsrat.pdf.  Google Scholar
  30. ILO (2018): World Employment Social Outlook 2018: Greening with Jobs. International Labour Office.  Google Scholar
  31. IMF (2022): World Economic Outlook. War sets back the global recovery. Washington.  Google Scholar
  32. Kalt, T. (2022): Agents of transition or defenders of the status quo? Trade union strategies in green transitions. Journal of Industrial Relations 64 (4), 499 – 521.  Google Scholar
  33. Keil, A. K. and Kreinin, H. (2022): Slowing the treadmill for a good life for All? German trade union narratives and social-ecological transformation. Journal of Industrial Relations 64 (4), 564 – 584.  Google Scholar
  34. Knight, K. W. (2018): Does Fossil Fuel Dependence Influence Public Awareness and Perception of Climate Change? A Cross-National Investigation. International Journal of Sociology 48 (4), 295 – 313. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2018.1515702.  Google Scholar
  35. Lerner, M. and Osgood, I. (2023): Across the Boards: Explaining Firm Support for Climate Policy. British Journal of Political Science 53 (3), 934 – 957.  Google Scholar
  36. Lichtblau, K., Schroeder, W., and Buhr, D. (2022): Transformationsregionen und Netzwerke. Studie für Netzwerk Zukunft der Industrie. Präsentation, iw consult, Berlin 29. November 2022.  Google Scholar
  37. Lu, J., Yu, D., Mahmoudian, F., Nazari, J. A., and Herremans, I. M. (2021): Board interlocks and greenhouse gas emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment 30 (1), 92 – 108.  Google Scholar
  38. Lübke, C. (2022): Socioeconomic roots of climate change denial and uncertainty among the European population. European Sociological Review 38 (1), 153 – 168.  Google Scholar
  39. McKinsey (2022): The net-zero Transition. What it would cost, what it could bring. January 2022. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/insights-on-the-net-zero-transition.  Google Scholar
  40. Mildenberger, M. (2020): Carbon Captured: How Business and Labor Control Climate Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  41. Montt, G., Wiebe, K. S., Harsdorff, M., Simas, M., Bonnet, A., and Wood, R. (2018): Does climate action destroy jobs? An assessment of the employment implications of the 2-degree goal. International Labour Review 157 (4), 519 – 556.  Google Scholar
  42. Oatley, T. and Blyth, M. (2021): The Death of the Carbon Coalition. Foreign Policy. Retrieved February 17, 2021. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/12/carbon-coalition-median-voter-us-politics/.  Google Scholar
  43. Peters, G. F., Romi, A. M., and Sanchez, J. M. (2019): The influence of corporate sustainability officers on performance. Journal of Business Ethics 159 (4), 1065 – 1087.  Google Scholar
  44. Popp, D., Vona, F., Marin, G., and Chen, Z. (2020): The employment impact of green fiscal push: Evidence from the American recovery act. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 27321.  Google Scholar
  45. Rottner, E. and von Graevenitz, K. (2021): What drives carbon emissions in German manufacturing: Scale, technique or composition? ZEW-centre for European economic research discussion paper, 21 – 027.  Google Scholar
  46. Scruggs, L. and Benegal, S. (2012): Declining Public Concern about Climate Change: Can We Blame the Great Recession? Global Environmental Change 22 (2), 505 – 15. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002.  Google Scholar
  47. Shapiro, J. S. and Walker, R. (2018): Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. American Economic Review 108 (12), 3814 – 3854.  Google Scholar
  48. Thomas, A. and Doerflinger, N. (2020): Trade union strategies on climate change mitigation: Between opposition, hedging and support. European Journal of Industrial Relations 26 (4), 383 – 399.  Google Scholar
  49. UITP and ETF (2021): Joint Statement for COP26 – Tackling climate action with public transport is one of the EU’s largest economic opportunities of the 21st century. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=521&langId=en&agreementId=5747.  Google Scholar
  50. Vona, F. (2021): Labour markets and the green transition: a practitioner’s guide to the task based approach, vol. 126681. Publications Office of the European Union.  Google Scholar
  51. Vona, F., Marin, G. and Consoli, D. (2019): Measures, drivers and effects of green employment: evidence from us local labor markets, 2006 – 2014. Journal of Economic Geography 19 (5), 1021 – 1048.  Google Scholar
  52. Vona, F., Marin, G., Consoli, D. and Popp, D. (2018): Environmental regulation and green skills: an empirical exploration. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 5 (4), 713 – 753.  Google Scholar
  53. Wagner, U. J., Kassem, D., Gerster, A., Jaraite, J., Klemetsen, M. E., Laukkanen, M., and Schusser, S. (2020): Carbon Footprints of European Manufacturing Jobs: Stylized Facts and Implications for Climate Policy. Available at SSRN 3577550.  Google Scholar
  54. Zwysen, W. and Drahokoupil, J. (2022): Are collective agreements losing their bite? Collective bargaining and pay premia in Europe, 2002 – 2018, Brussels. ETUI Working Paper 2022.07.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Zusammenfassung: Der Beitrag untersucht die Rolle der Sozialpartnerschaft zur Reduzierung von Treibhausgasemissionen in Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union. Einerseits können die Sozialpartner dazu beitragen den Übergang zu niedrigeren Emissionen zu erleichtern, indem sie mit den betroffenen Arbeitnehmern über die Kosten und den Nutzen von Maßnahmen zur Verringerung des Klimawandels verhandeln. Andererseits ist die Sozialpartnerschaft in Sektoren mit hohen Emissionen stärker ausgeprägt. Das könnte dazu führen, dass Sozialpartner versuchen, die Geschwindigkeit zur Reduzierung emissionsintensiver Produktionsprozesse zu verringern. Wir verwenden Daten aus der europäischen Verdienststrukturerhebung, Structure of Earnings Survey, um die Beziehung zwischen Tarifbindung, gewerkschaftlicher Organisation, Löhnen und Industrieemissionen in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten zu untersuchen. Wir finden, dass Sektoren mit hohen Emissionen höhere Gewinne, Löhne und geringere Lohnungleichheit aufweisen. Berufe mit hohen Emissionen sind hingegen nicht besser bezahlt. Gleichzeitig gibt es deutliche Unterschiede zwischen den Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union. Abschließend erörtern wir, wie die Sozialpartnerschaft mit dem Dilemma umgeht, in den stark fossilen Industrien verwurzelt zu sein und gleichzeitig den Wandel zu verhandeln.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Transformation als Herausforderung 1
Anke Hassel und Kilian Weil: 1
1 Introduction: Transition and decarbonization of European economies 2
2 Social partners and the green transition 3
3 Identifying high emitting sectors and jobs 4
4 Fossil fuel-based sectors are more profitable, better paid and more equitable 8
5 Brown jobs are not better jobs than others but benefit from collective bargaining 9
6 Just transition and regional inequality: the example of coal mining closures and transformation councils in Germany and other EU member states 11
6.1 Coal mine closures in Germany 11
6.2 Regional networks for industry and networks for transformation 13
6.3 Other examples for social partner engagement for decarbonization 14
7 Conclusion 15
References 16

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.