Menu Expand

On Democracy and Capitalism: Reflections on Gerhard Wegner’s Historical Analysis

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Koppl, R. On Democracy and Capitalism: Reflections on Gerhard Wegner’s Historical Analysis. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 99999(), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.359745
Koppl, Roger "On Democracy and Capitalism: Reflections on Gerhard Wegner’s Historical Analysis" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 99999., 2024, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.359745
Koppl, Roger (2024): On Democracy and Capitalism: Reflections on Gerhard Wegner’s Historical Analysis, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 99999, iss. , 1-24, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.359745

Format

On Democracy and Capitalism: Reflections on Gerhard Wegner’s Historical Analysis

Koppl, Roger

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. (2024), Online First : pp. 1–24

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Roger Koppl, Whitman School of Management, Syracuse University 721 University Avenue 13244 Syracuse, USA

References

  1. Allen, R. C. 2001. “The Great Divergence in European Wages and Prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War.” Explorations in Economic History 38 (4): 411 – 47.  Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Nogal, C. and L. Prados de la Escosura. 2013. “The Rise and Fall of Spain (1270 – 1850).” Economic History Review 66 (1): 1 – 37.  Google Scholar
  3. Ashton, T. S. 1948. The Industrial Revolution, 1760 – 1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  4. Ashton, T. S. 1949. “The Standard of Life of the Workers in England, 1790 – 1830.” Journal of Economic History 9 (Supplement): 19 – 38.  Google Scholar
  5. Ashton, T. S. 1954. “The Treatment of Capitalism by Historians.” In Capitalism and the Historians, edited by F. A. Hayek, 31 – 61. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  6. Bak, P., C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld. 1987. “Self-organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/ƒ Noise.” Physical Review Letters 59 (4): 381 – 4.  Google Scholar
  7. Berman, H. J. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Bezanson, A. 1922. “The Early Use of the Term Industrial Revolution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 36 (2): 343 – 9.  Google Scholar
  9. Bodenhorn, H., T. W. Guinnane, and T. A. Mroz. 2017. “Sample-Selection Biases and the Industrialization Puzzle.” Journal of Economic History 77 (1): 171 – 207.  Google Scholar
  10. Brebner, J. B. 1948. “Laissez Faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Journal of Economic History 8 (1): 59 – 73.  Google Scholar
  11. Broadberry, S., M. S. Bruce, A. K. Campbell, M. Overton, and B. Van Leeuwen. 2015. British Economic Growth, 1270 – 1870. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Cazzolla Gatti, R., R. Koppl, B. D. Fath, S. Kauffman, W. Hordijk, and R. Ulanowicz. 2020. “On the Emergence of Ecological and Economic Niches.” Journal of Bioeconomics 22 (2): 99 – 127.  Google Scholar
  13. Chaptal, J.-A. 1819. De l’industrie française, Vol. 2. Paris: Antoine-Augustin Renouard.  Google Scholar
  14. Cinnirella, F. 2008. “Optimists or Pessimists? A Reconsideration of Nutritional Status in Britain, 1740 – 1865.” European Review of Economic History 12 (3): 325 – 54.  Google Scholar
  15. Clapham, J. H. 1910. “The Transference of the Worsted Industry from Norfolk to the West Riding.” The Economic Journal 20 (78): 195 – 210.  Google Scholar
  16. Clapham, J. H. (1926) 1939. An Economic History of Modern Britain: The Early Railway Age, 1820 – 1850. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Clark, G. 2001. “Farm Wages and Living Standards in the Industrial Revolution: England, 1670 – 1869.” Economic History Review 54 (3): 477 – 505.  Google Scholar
  18. Clark, G. 2005. “The Condition of the Working Class in England, 1209 – 2004.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (6): 1307 – 40.  Google Scholar
  19. Clark, G. 2007. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  20. Clark, G. 2012. “A Review Essay On: ‘The Enlightened Economy. An Economic History of Britain, 1700 – 1850’ by Joel Mokyr.” Journal of Economic Literature 50 (1): 85 – 95.  Google Scholar
  21. Clark, J. C. D. 1986. Revolution and Rebellion: State and Society in England in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  22. Colquhoun, P. 1814. A Treatise on the Wealth, Power and Resources of the British Empire. London: Mawman.  Google Scholar
  23. De Voragine, J. 2012. The Golden Legend: Reading on the Saints. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  24. Devins, C., R. Koppl, S. Kauffman, and T. Felin. 2015. “Against Design.” Arizona State Law Journal 47 (3): 609 – 81.  Google Scholar
  25. Engels, F. (1845) 1887. Conditions of the Working Class in England. New York.  Google Scholar
  26. Engerman, S. L. 1994. “Reflections on ‘The Standard of Living Debate’: New Arguments and New Evidence.” In Capitalism in Context: Essays on Economic Development and Cultural Change in Honor of R. M. Hartwell, edited by J. A. James and M. Thomas, 50 – 79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Feinstein, C. H. 1998. “Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living in Britain During and After the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 58 (3): 625 – 58.  Google Scholar
  28. Floud, R. and B. Harris. 1997. “Health, Height, and Welfare: Britain, 1700 – 1980.” In Health and Welfare during Industrialization, edited by R. H Steckel and R. Floud, 91 – 126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  29. Floud, R., K. Wachter, and A. Gregory. 1990. Height, Health and History: Nutritional Status in the United Kingdom, 1750 – 1980. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  30. Fogel, R. W., S. L. Engerman, R. Floud, G. Friedman, R. A. Margo, K. Sokoloff, R. H. Steckel, T. J. Trussell, G. Villaflor, and K. W. Wachter. 1983. “Secular Changes in American and British Stature and Nutrition.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 14 (2): 445 – 81.  Google Scholar
  31. Galor, O. and D. N. Weil. 2000. “Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 806 – 28.  Google Scholar
  32. Goldstone, J. A. 2002. “Efflorescences and Economic Growth in World History: Rethinking the ‘Rise of the West’ and the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of World History 13 (2): 323 – 89.  Google Scholar
  33. Griffin, E. n.d. “The ‘Industrial Revolution’: Interpretations from 1830 to the Present.” Accessed November 4, 2023. http://www.uea.ac.uk/documents/1006128/1446434/Emma+Griffin+industrialrevolution.pdf/816bcd4c-ac9b-4700-aae4-ee6767d4f04a.  Google Scholar
  34. Griffin, E. 2013. Liberty’s Dawn: A People’s History of the Industrial Revolution. New Haven, NJ and London: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  35. Griffin, E. 2018. “Diets, Hunger and Living Standards During the British Industrial Revolution.” Past & Present 239 (1): 71 – 111.  Google Scholar
  36. Haines, M. R. 2004. “Growing Incomes, Shrinking People—Can Economic Development Be Hazardous to Your Health?: Historical Evidence for the United States, England, and the Netherlands in the Nineteenth Century.” Social Science History 28 (2): 249 – 70.  Google Scholar
  37. Hartwell, R. M. 1969. “Economic Growth in England Before the Industrial Revolution: Some Methodological Issues.” Journal of Economic History 29 (1): 13 – 31.  Google Scholar
  38. Hartwell, R. M. (1971) 2017. The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  39. Hartwell, R. M. 1990. “Was There an Industrial Revolution?” Social Science History 14 (4): 567 – 576.  Google Scholar
  40. Hayek, F. A. 1954. “History as Politics.” In Capitalism and the Historians, edited by F. A. Hayek, 3 – 29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  41. Hobsbawn, E. J. 1963. “The Standard of Living During the Industrial Revolution: A Discussion.” Economic History Review 16 (1): 119 – 34.  Google Scholar
  42. Horrell, S. and J. Humphries. 1992. “Old Questions, New Data, and Alternative Perspectives: Families’ Living Standards in the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 52 (4): 849 – 80.  Google Scholar
  43. Hume, D. 1741. Essays, Moral and Political. Edinburgh, UK: R. Fleming and A. Alison.  Google Scholar
  44. Hume, D. (1777) 1987. Essays Moral, Political, Literary. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  45. Hume, D. (1778) 1983. The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to The Revolution in 1688. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  46. Humphries, J. 1990. “Enclosures, Common Rights, and Women: The Proletarianization of Families in Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Economic History 50 (1): 17 – 42.  Google Scholar
  47. Humphries, J. 1991. “‘Lurking in the Wings …’: Women in the Historiography of the Industrial Revolution.” Business and Economic History 20 (1991): 32 – 44.  Google Scholar
  48. Koppl, R, R. Cazzolla Gatti, A. Deveraux, B. D. Fath, J. Herriott, W. Hordijk, S. Kauffman, R. E. Ulanowicz, and S. Valverde. 2023. Explaining Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  49. Lachmann, L. (1969) 1977. “Methodological Individualism and the Market Economy.” In Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process, 149 – 65. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc.  Google Scholar
  50. Le Roy Ladurie, E., N. Bernageau, and Y. Pasquet. 1969. “Le conscrit et l’ordinateur. Perspectives de recherche sur les archives militaires du XIXe siècle français.” Studi Storici 10 (2): 260 – 308.  Google Scholar
  51. Locay, L. 1989. “From Hunting and Gathering to Agriculture.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 37 (4): 737 – 56.  Google Scholar
  52. Lyons, J. S., L. P. Cain, and S. H. Williamson. 2008. “Introduction: Economic History and Cliometrics.” In Reflections on the Cliometrics Revolution: Conversations with Economic Historians, edited by J. S. Lyons, L. P. Cain, and S. H. Williamson. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  53. Madison, J., A. Hamilton, and J. Jay. (1788) 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York City: Bantam Books.  Google Scholar
  54. Magness, P. W. and M. Makovi. 2023. “The Mainstreaming of Marx: Measuring the Effect of the Russian Revolution on Karl Marx’s Influence.” Journal of Political Economy 131 (6): 1507 – 45.  Google Scholar
  55. Malanima, P. 2011. The Long Decline of a Leading Economy: GDP in Central and Northern Italy, 1300 – 1913. European Review Economic History 15 (2): 169 – 219.  Google Scholar
  56. McCloskey, D. N. 1981. “The Industrial Revolution 1780 – 1860: A Survey.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, Vol. 1: 1700 – 1860, edited by R. Floud and D. McCloskey, 103 – 27. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  57. McCloskey, D. N. 2016. “The Great Enrichment: A Humanistic and Social Scientific Account.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 64 (1): 6 – 18.  Google Scholar
  58. Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Charles C. Little & James Brown.  Google Scholar
  59. Mill, J. S. 1909. Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: Longmans, Green and Co.  Google Scholar
  60. Mises, L. v. (1927) 1985. Liberalism In the Classical Tradition. New York: Foundation for Economic Education, Inc. and San Francisco: Cobden Press.  Google Scholar
  61. Morin, A. A., V. Geloso, and V. Kufenko. 2017. “The Heights of French-Canadian Convicts, 1780s–1820s.” Economics and Human Biology 26 (C): 126 – 36.  Google Scholar
  62. North, D. C., J. J. Wallis, and B. R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  63. Novak, M. 2021. Freedom in Contention: Social Movements and Liberal Political Economy. Lanham: Lexington Books.  Google Scholar
  64. Rahim, E. 2018. “Marx – From Hegel and Feuerbach to Adam Smith: A New Synthesis.” International Critical Thought 8 (2): 193 – 209.  Google Scholar
  65. Smith, A. (1776) 1982. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  66. Solow, R. M. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65 – 94.  Google Scholar
  67. Steckel, R. H. 2009. “Heights and Human Welfare: Recent Developments and New Directions.” Explorations in Economic History 46 (1): 1 – 23.  Google Scholar
  68. Szreter, S. and G. Mooney. 1998. “Urbanization, Mortality, and the Standard of Living Debate: New Estimates of the Expectation of Life at Birth in Nineteenth-Century British Cities.” Economic History Review 51 (1): 84 – 112.  Google Scholar
  69. Tarko, V. 2023. “Economic Efficiency and the Quest for a More Just World.” In Realism, Ideology, and the Convulsions of Democracy, edited by M. Novak, M. Podemska-Mikluch, and R. E. Wagner, 129 – 48. New York: Springer.  Google Scholar
  70. Temin, P. 1991. “Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning in the 1930s” Economic History Review 44 (4): 573 – 93.  Google Scholar
  71. Toynbee, A. 1884. “Progress and Poverty” a Criticism of Mr. Henry George: Being Two Lectures Delivered in St. Andrew’s Hall, Newman Street, London. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.  Google Scholar
  72. Trussell, J. and R. Steckel. 1978. “The Age of Slaves at Menarche and Their First Birth.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (3): 477 – 505.  Google Scholar
  73. Ure, A. 1835. The Philosophy of Manufactures: An Exposition of the Factory System of Great Britain. London: Charles Knight.  Google Scholar
  74. Wegner, G. 2015. “Capitalist Transformation Without Political Participation: German Capitalism in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century.” Constitutional Political Economy 26 (1): 61 – 86.  Google Scholar
  75. Wegner, G. 2016. “Defensive Modernization in Germany and in the Habsburg Empire – A Historical Study of Capitalist Transformation.” Journal of Institutional Economics 12 (2): 443 – 69.  Google Scholar
  76. Wegner, G. 2020. “Reassessing the Dependence of Capitalism on Democracy – The Case of Imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic.” Journal of Institutional Economics 16 (3): 337 – 54.  Google Scholar
  77. Williamson, S. H. and J. S. Lyons. 2008. “Robert Fogel, interviewed by Samuel H. Williamson and John S. Lyon.” In Reflections on the Cliometrics Revolution: Conversations with Economic Historians, edited by J. S. Lyons, L P. Cain, and S. H. Williamson, 221 – 31. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  78. Wood, G. H. 1899. “The Course of Average Wages Between 1790 and 1860.” Economic Journal 9 (36): 588 – 92.  Google Scholar
  79. Woods, R. 2000. The Demography of Victorian England and Wales. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  80. Wrigley, E. A. 1969. Population and History. New York and Toronto: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  81. Wrigley, E. A. 1983. “The Growth of Population in Eighteenth-Century England: A Conundrum Resolved.” Past & Present 98 (1): 121 – 50.  Google Scholar
  82. Wrigley, E. A., R. S. Davis, J. E. Oeppen, and R. S. Schofield. 1997. English Population History from Family Reconstitution: 1580 – 1837. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  83. Wrigley, E. A. and R. S. Schofield. 1981. The Population History of England 1541 – 1871: A Reconstruction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  84. van Zanden, J. L. and B. van Leeuwen. 2012. “Persistent but Not Consistent: The Growth of National Income in Holland 1347 – 1807.” Explorations in Economic History 49 (2): 119 – 30.  Google Scholar
  85. Zimran, A. 2019. “Sample-Selection Bias and Height Trends in the Nineteenth-Century United States.” Journal of Economic History 79 (1): 99 – 138.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Gerhard Wegner has shown that capitalism and democracy may not be mutually supporting, and political liberty may not lead to economic liberty. Personal and economic liberty once established may fall away more easily than scholars such as North, Wallis, and Weingast (2009) and Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) maintain. I bolster Wegner’s nuanced view with evidence of the early effects of the Industrial Revolution on worker wealth and welfare. Workers benefited immediately, and Britain’s greatest increases in economic and political liberty came only after this increase in wealth. These historical facts suggest the need for a theory of institutional evolution in which wealth enables social movements that often engender increased political and economic liberty. Political and economic institutions cannot in general be designed and imposed. But when the people are enriched by technological change or earlier increases in liberty, then institutional changes promoting greater liberty may well emerge from the struggles of social movements.