Menu Expand

Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Der Betriebswirt
  4. Vol. 65, Issue 1
  5. pp. 53–65

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Schmidt, J., Brandes, N., Voigt, L., von der Oelsnitz, D. Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis. Der Betriebswirt, 65(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.2024.1446705
Schmidt, Johannes; Brandes, Nico; Voigt, Ludger and von der Oelsnitz, Dietrich "Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis" Der Betriebswirt 65.1, 2024, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.2024.1446705
Schmidt, Johannes/Brandes, Nico/Voigt, Ludger/von der Oelsnitz, Dietrich (2024): Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis, in: Der Betriebswirt, vol. 65, iss. 1, 53-65, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.2024.1446705
Format
Download

Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis

Schmidt, Johannes | Brandes, Nico | Voigt, Ludger | von der Oelsnitz, Dietrich

Der Betriebswirt, Vol. 65 (2024), Iss. 1 : pp. 53–65

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot, Deutscher Betriebswirte Verlag
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.2024.1446705
Language
German
Pages
13

Pricing

Individual
€ 19.50 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Schmidt, Johannes

  • Johannes Schmidt, M.Sc., Studium der Betriebswirtschaftslehre mit Schwerpunkt Personal- und Verhaltensorientiertes-Management an der Universität des Saarlandes. Doktorand am Institut für Unternehmensführung und Organisation der Technischen Universität Braunschweig. Sein Forschungsgebiet ist: Evidenzbasiertes (HR-)Management.
  • Email
  • Search in Google Scholar

Brandes, Nico

  • Nico Brandes, M.Sc. in Management mit den Schwerpunkten Business Development & Strategic Management an der Goerg-August-Universität Göttingen. Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Unternehmensführung und Organisation der Technischen Universität Braunschweig. Seine Forschungsgebiete sind: Unternehmensentwicklung & Organisation.
  • Search in Google Scholar

Voigt, Ludger

  • Ludger Voigt, M.A., studierte Nachhaltiges Management an der TU Berlin und Plurale Ökonomik an der Universität Siegen. Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Unternehmensführung und Organisation der Technischen Universität Brauschweig. Seine Forschungsschwerpunkte sind: Human Resource Management und Nachhaltige Entwicklung im Genossenschaftswesen.
  • Search in Google Scholar

von der Oelsnitz, Dietrich

  • Dietrich von der Oelsnitz, Dr. rer. pol. habil., o. Universitätsprofessor. Studium der Wirtschaftswissenschaften an der TU Braunschweig sowie der Betriebswirtschaftslehre an der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. Seit Oktober 2007 Leiter des Instituts für Unternehmensführung und Organisation an der Technischen Universität Braunschweig. Arbeitsschwerpunkte: Leadership, Strategisches Management und Koopera­tionsforschung.
  • Search in Google Scholar

References

  1. Aguinis, H. (2023): 2022 Presidential Address: This Is Our Celebration. Academy of Management Review, 48(2), 181–186.  Google Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H./Cummings, C./Ramani, R. S./Cummings G. (2020): „An a is an a“: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Acadamy of Manangement Perspectives, 34(1), 135–154.  Google Scholar
  3. Aguinis, H./Shapiro, D. L./Antonacopoulou, E. P./Cummings, T. G. (2014): Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 623–639.  Google Scholar
  4. Baecker, D./Stanitzek, G./Berlin, M. V. (1987): Niklas Luhmann: Archimedes und wir. Interviews.  Google Scholar
  5. Banks, G. C./Pollack, J. M./Bochantin, J. E./Kirkman, B. L./Whelpley, C. E./O’Boyle, E. H. (2016): Management’s science practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1–27.  Google Scholar
  6. Bartunek, J. M./Rynes, S. L. (2010): The Construction and Contributions of „Implications for Practice“: What’s in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 100–117.  Google Scholar
  7. Bartunek, J. M./Rynes, S. L. (2014): Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201.  Google Scholar
  8. Bennis, W. G./O’Toole, J. (2005): How business schools lost their way. Havard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.  Google Scholar
  9. Boland, R. J./Singh, J./Salipante, P./Aram, J. D./Fay, S. Y./Kanawattanachai, P. (2001): Knowledge representations and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 393–417.  Google Scholar
  10. Briner, R. B./Denyer, D./Rousseau, D. M. (2009): Evidence-based management: concept cleanup time? Academy of management perspectives, 23(4), 19–32.  Google Scholar
  11. Carless, S. A./Rasiah, J./Irmer B. E. (2009): Discrepancy between human resource research and practice: Comparison of industrial/organisational psychologists and human resource practitioners’ beliefs. Australian Psychologist, 44(2), 105–111.  Google Scholar
  12. Cummings, T. G. (2007): Quest for an engaged academy. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 355–360.  Google Scholar
  13. de Frutos-Belizón, J./Martín-Alcázar, F./Sánchez-Gardey, G. (2020): The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap. Review of Managerial Science, 15(6), 1465–1515.  Google Scholar
  14. DeNisi, A. S. (1994): Is relevant research irrelevant? On evaluating the contribution of research to management practice. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(2), 145–159.  Google Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P. J./Powell, W. W. (1983): The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.  Google Scholar
  16. Dipboye, R. L. (2007): Eight outrageous statements about HR science. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 96–106.  Google Scholar
  17. Farndale, E./McDonell, A./Scholaris, D./Wilkinson, A. (2020): Human Resource Management Journal: A look to the past, present, and future of the journal and HRM scholarship. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 1–12.  Google Scholar
  18. Hambrick, D. C. (1994): Presidential address. What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16.  Google Scholar
  19. Hitt, M. A./Keats, B. W./DeMarie, S. M. (1998): Navigating in the new competitive landscape. Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(4), 22–42.  Google Scholar
  20. Huff, A. S. (2000): 1999 Presidential address: Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of management Review, 25(2), 288–293.  Google Scholar
  21. Ireland, R. D. (2015): 2014 Presidential Address: Our Academy, Our Future. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 151–162.  Google Scholar
  22. Jarzabkowski, P./Mohrman, S. A./Scherer, A. G. (2010): Organization studies as applied science: The generation and use of academic knowledge about organizations introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1189–1207.  Google Scholar
  23. Kelemen, M./Bansal, P. (2002): The Conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management, 13(2), 97–108.  Google Scholar
  24. Kieser, A./Leiner, L. (2009): Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533.  Google Scholar
  25. Kuckertz, A. (2012): Evidence-based Management – Mittel zur Überbrückung der Kluft von akademischer Strenge und praktischer Relevanz? Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 64, 803–827.  Google Scholar
  26. Kühl, S. (2015): Sisyphos im Management. Die vergebliche Suche nach der optimalen Organisationsstruktur. 2. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main.  Google Scholar
  27. Kulik, C. T. (2020): 2019 presidential address – management scholars, end users, and the power of thinking small. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 273–279.  Google Scholar
  28. Lawler, E. E. (2007): Why HR practices are not evidence-based. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1033–1036.  Google Scholar
  29. Lynch, K. (2015): Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 190–207.  Google Scholar
  30. Mohrman, S. A./Lawler, E. (2011): Useful research: Advancing theory and practice. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.  Google Scholar
  31. Oesterle, M. J. (2006): Wahrnehmung betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften durch Praktiker. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 66(3), 307–325.  Google Scholar
  32. Osterloh, M./Frey, B. S. (2015): Rankings und der Preis der Wissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaft, 9(1), 65–76.  Google Scholar
  33. Peters, T. (2001): Tom Peter’s True Confession. https://www.fastcompany.com/44077/tom-peterss-true-confessions, abgerufen am 10.02.2024.  Google Scholar
  34. Pfeffer, J./Sutton, R. I. (2006): Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review.  Google Scholar
  35. Pinheiro, R./Lnga, P. V./Pausits, A. (2015): The institutionalization of universities’ third mission: introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 227–232.  Google Scholar
  36. Rosenzweig, P. (2008): Der Halo-Effekt: wie Manager sich täuschen lassen. GABAL Verlag GmbH.  Google Scholar
  37. Rousseau, D. M. (2006): Is there Such a thing as „Evidence-Based Management“? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256–269.  Google Scholar
  38. Rousseau, D. M./McCarthy, S. (2007): Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 84–101.  Google Scholar
  39. Rynes, S. L./Bartunek, J. M./Daft, R. L. (2001): Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340–355.  Google Scholar
  40. Rynes, S. L./Colbert, A. E./Brown, K. G. (2002): HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management, 41(2), 149–174.  Google Scholar
  41. Sanders, K./Van Riemsdijk, M./Groen, B. (2008): The gap between research and practice: a replication study on the HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1976–1988.  Google Scholar
  42. Schmidt, F. L./Hunter, J. E. (1998): The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.  Google Scholar
  43. Schmidt, F. L./Oh, I. S./Shaffer, J. A. (2016): The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years. Fox School of Business Research Paper, 1–74.  Google Scholar
  44. Shapiro, D. L./Kirkman, B. L./Courtney, H. G. (2007): Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 249–266.  Google Scholar
  45. Sharma, G./Bansal, P. (2023): Partnering Up: Including Managers as Research Partners in Systematic Reviews. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 262–291.  Google Scholar
  46. Tenhiälä, A./Giluk, L. T./Kepes, S./Simón, S./Kim, S. (2016): The research-practice gap in human resource management: A cross-cultural study. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 179–200.  Google Scholar
  47. Timming, A. R./Macneil, J. (2023): Bridging human resource management theory and practice: Implications for industry-engaged academic research. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 592–605.  Google Scholar
  48. Tranfield, D./Starkey, K. (1998): The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9, 341–353.  Google Scholar
  49. Tsui, A. S. (2021): Responsible Research and responsible leadership studies. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(2), 166–170.  Google Scholar
  50. Van de Ven, A. H. (2002): Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This academy is for you! Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 171–184.  Google Scholar
  51. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007): Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press, USA.  Google Scholar
  52. Van de Ven, A. H./Johnson, P. E. (2006): Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.  Google Scholar

Abstract

While management research is often criticized for not sufficiently addressing practical or socially relevant issues, it has also been noted that business practice often does not adequately consider scientific findings. This leads to a perceived gap between academia and practical applications. This article discusses potential underlying causes for this phenomenon. In addition, considerations for bringing science and practice closer together are presented.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Johannes Schmidt et al.: Die Lücke zwischen (HR-)Managementforschung und Praxis 53
Abstract 53
Zusammenfassung 54
Ein Phänomen und seine Bedeutung 54
Verpasste Chancen – Gründe für die Lücke zwischen Forschung und Praxis 56
„Lost before translation“ vs. „lost in translation“ 59
Perspektiven zur Überwindung der Lücke zwischen Forschung und Praxis 60
Literaturverzeichnis 62

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.