Menu Expand

Passportisation: From a Neglectable Phenomenon Under International Law to an Elusive Imperialist Strategy?

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Weber, F. Passportisation: From a Neglectable Phenomenon Under International Law to an Elusive Imperialist Strategy?. German Yearbook of International Law, 66(1), 129-176. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2024.367982
Weber, Ferdinand "Passportisation: From a Neglectable Phenomenon Under International Law to an Elusive Imperialist Strategy?" German Yearbook of International Law 66.1, 2024, 129-176. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2024.367982
Weber, Ferdinand (2024): Passportisation: From a Neglectable Phenomenon Under International Law to an Elusive Imperialist Strategy?, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 66, iss. 1, 129-176, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2024.367982

Format

Passportisation: From a Neglectable Phenomenon Under International Law to an Elusive Imperialist Strategy?

Weber, Ferdinand

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 66 (2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 129–176

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Ferdinand Weber, Institute of International and European Law, Georg-August-University Göttingen ,

Abstract

Abstract: Passportisation emerged as a term to describe the practice of ‘handing out’ nationality in border zones and conflict-scenarios. It affects the international community as such because it serves as an instrument to push personal and territorial borders. While passportisation remains practically tied to Russia, it seems hard to grasp doctrinally and raises various questions in international law. Nationality law remains a field traditionally deemed as domaine réservé of States, notwithstanding the developments in human rights and anti-discrimination law. This article firstly clarifies the geopolitical context of passportisation by analyzing the terms Empire and Imperialism. Secondly, it discusses the phenomenon of extraterritorial naturalisations generally, including comparative perspectives. Thirdly, it discusses changing structures of Russia’s domestic nationality law and practice in a number of conflicts to elucidate the relationship between its doctrine and argumentation in foreign policy matters. Lastly, it provides an assessment on the compatibility of the Russian practice with international law.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Ferdinand Weber\nPassportisation: From a Neglectable Phenomenon Under International Law to an Elusive Imperialist Strategy? 129
I. Introduction 129
A. The Legal Heritage of ‘Empire’ in International Law 132
B. Political Vitality of Imperialist Thinking in Russia 135
C. Consequences: Differentiating Analytical Insights from Doctrinal Reasoning 137
II. The (Almost) Neglectable Phenomenon: ‘Handing out’ Nationality Beyond Borders 138
A. Individual Cases: A (Mainly) Uncontested State Practice 139
B. Diaspora Policies 141
C. Extraterritorial Mass Naturalisations and Inter-State Conflicts 144
III. Passportisation and ‘Weaponised Citizenship’: The Russian Case‍(s) 146
A. Changing Structures in Domestic Law 147
B. Russian Practice: Transnistria, Georgia, Crimea, and Donbas 151
1. Transnistria 151
2. Georgia 152
3. Crimea 155
4. Donbas and Other Parts of Ukraine 157
C. De-Passportisation and the Permanent State of Probation 159
D. Normative Verdict: An Elusive Imperialist Strategy in Legal Forms? 160
IV. Compatibility with International Law 161
A. The Framework of International Nationality Law 162
1. Relativity and Continuity of the Domaine Réservé 162
2. Uncontested Limits: Forced Naturalisation and Missing ‘Reasonable’ Connections 165
3. Consequence: Non-Recognition 167
B. The Abuse of Rights Doctrine and the Principle of Good Faith (Bona Fide) 169
C. Contextualisation: The Russian Actions and General International Law 171
1. Missing Justification for the Use of Force 171
2. Treaty Obligations in International Humanitarian Law 174
V. Conclusion: Upholding International Law Through Persistent Rejection 175