Menu Expand

Where is the Labor Theory of Value in Adam Smith? Adam Smith’s Value Theory Revisited

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Hurtado, J., Paganelli, M. Where is the Labor Theory of Value in Adam Smith? Adam Smith’s Value Theory Revisited. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 99999(), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.380332
Hurtado, Jimena and Paganelli, Maria Pia "Where is the Labor Theory of Value in Adam Smith? Adam Smith’s Value Theory Revisited" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 99999., 2024, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.380332
Hurtado, Jimena/Paganelli, Maria Pia (2024): Where is the Labor Theory of Value in Adam Smith? Adam Smith’s Value Theory Revisited, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 99999, iss. , 1-17, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.380332

Format

Where is the Labor Theory of Value in Adam Smith? Adam Smith’s Value Theory Revisited

Hurtado, Jimena | Paganelli, Maria Pia

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. (2024), Online First : pp. 1–17

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Jimena Hurtado, Universidad de los Andes Cra 1 Nº 18 A – 12 111711 Bogotá, Colombia

Maria Pia Paganelli, Trinity University One Trinity Place TX 78212 – 7200 San Antonio, USA

References

  1. Andrews, D. 2019. Rereading Adam Smith on Labour Commanded: Value from Different Points of View. Paper presented at the meeting of the History of Economics Society, June 22, 2019.  Google Scholar
  2. Aspromourgos, T. 2009. The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  3. Blaug, M. 1962. Economic Theory in Retrospect. London: Heinemann.  Google Scholar
  4. Cartelier, J. 1976. Surproduit et reproduction: la formation de l’économie politique. Fontain: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.  Google Scholar
  5. Diatkine, D. 2019. Adam Smith. La découverte du capitalisme et de ses limites. Paris: Editions Seuil.  Google Scholar
  6. Dellemotte, J. 2019. “Valeur et repartition, entre enjeux analytiques et normatifs.” In Histoire de la pensée économique, edited by S. Ferey and S. Rivot, 43 – 70. London: Pearson.  Google Scholar
  7. Duboeuf, F. 2001. “Travail commandé, travail incorporé, de Smith à Ricardo: analyse d’un malentendu.” IX Conference Association Charles Gide.  Google Scholar
  8. Henry, J. 2000. “Adam Smith and the Theory of Value: Chapter Six Considered.” History of Economics Review 31 (1): 1 – 13.  Google Scholar
  9. Hollander, S. 1973. The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.  Google Scholar
  10. Hoover, K. D. and M. E. Dowell. 2001. “Measuring causes: episodes in the quantitative assessment of the value of money.” History of Political Economy 33: 371 – 4.  Google Scholar
  11. Hurtado, J. 2003. “La teoría del valor de Adam Smith: la cuestión de los precios naturales y sus interpretaciones.” Cuadernos de Economía 22 (38): 15 – 45.  Google Scholar
  12. Hurtado, J. and M. P. Paganelli. 2023. “Diamonds are not forever: Adam Smith and Carl Menger on value and relative status.” Review of Austrian Economics 36: 289 – 310.  Google Scholar
  13. Kurz, H. D. and N. Salvadori. 2023. “Marx’s concept of ‘exploitation’ and the problem of measurement.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 212: 887 – 96.  Google Scholar
  14. Meek, R. L. 1955. The Scottish Contribution to Marxist Sociology. Lawrence & Wishart.  Google Scholar
  15. Paganelli, M. P. 2006. “Hume and Endogenous Money.” Eastern Economic Journal 32: 533 – 47.  Google Scholar
  16. Paganelli, M. P. 2020. The Routledge Guidebook to Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  17. Paganelli, M. P. 2022. “Adam Smith’s Digression on Silver: The Centrepiece of the Wealth of Nations.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 46 (3): 531 – 44.  Google Scholar
  18. Peart, S. and D. M. Levy. 2005. The “Vanity of the Philosopher”: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Pribram, K. 1983. A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.  Google Scholar
  20. Ricardo, D. (1817) 2004. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation: The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  21. Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.  Google Scholar
  22. Smith, A. (1776) 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (WN), 2 vols., Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  23. Smith, A. (1759) 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  24. Smith, A. (1766) 1982. Lectures on Jurisprudence, Report dated 1762 – 3 (LJ(A)), in his Lectures on Jurisprudence (LJ), Glasgow Edition, 1 – 394. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  25. Smith, A. (1766) 1982. Lectures on Jurisprudence, Report dated 1766 (LJ(B)), in his Lectures on Jurisprudence (LJ), Glasgow Edition, 395 – 554. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  26. Smith, A. 1987. The Correspondence of Adam Smith (CAS). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  27. Spang, R. 2017. Stuff and Money in the Time of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Commentators often follow David Ricardo in looking, especially, at chapters V and VI of Book I of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations as the place to find his theory of value. And most commentators attribute to Adam Smith some versions of a labor theory of value. But in those chapters, Smith is looking for a stable unit of measurement of value and the reservation price of bringing goods to market. We thus suggest that the labor theory of value in Smith is a Ricardian construct, not a Smithian one.