Menu Expand

A Realist Political Economy and Moral Philosophy: Smith and Mittermaier

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Stettler, M. A Realist Political Economy and Moral Philosophy: Smith and Mittermaier. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 99999(), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.381588
Stettler, Michael "A Realist Political Economy and Moral Philosophy: Smith and Mittermaier" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 99999., 2024, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.381588
Stettler, Michael (2024): A Realist Political Economy and Moral Philosophy: Smith and Mittermaier, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 99999, iss. , 1-20, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.381588

Format

A Realist Political Economy and Moral Philosophy: Smith and Mittermaier

Stettler, Michael

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. (2024), Online First : pp. 1–20

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Michael Stettler, Karl Mittermaier Centre for Philosophy of Economics, University of Johannesburg 1 Tolip Street Westdene, Johannesburg, South Africa

References

  1. Berquist, D. 2005. “The distinction between Nature and Reason or Will.” Peripatetikos 5: 21 – 63.  Google Scholar
  2. Bladen, V. W. 1960. “Adam Smith on Productive and Unproductive Labour: A Theory of Full Development.” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue Canadienne d’Economique et de Science politique 26 (4): 625 – 30.  Google Scholar
  3. Buckle, H. T. (1861) 1903. History of Civilization in England. London: John W. Parker and Son.  Google Scholar
  4. Carrasco, M. A. 2012. “Adam Smith: Self-Command, Practical Reason and Deontological Insights.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2): 391 – 414.  Google Scholar
  5. Evensky, J. 2005a. “Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments: On Morals and Why They Matter to a Liberal Society of Free People and Free Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 109 – 30.  Google Scholar
  6. Evensky, J. 2005b. “‘Chicago Smith’ versus ‘Kirkaldy Smith’.” History of Political Economy 37 (2): 19 – 203.  Google Scholar
  7. Frankfurt, H. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of Person.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (1): 5 – 20.  Google Scholar
  8. Haakonssen, K. 2002. “Introduction” to Theory of Moral Sentiments edited by K. Haakonssen, vii-xxviii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  9. Mandeville, B. (1714) 1988. The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  10. Mittermaier, K. 2019. “The Invisible Hand and Some Thoughts on the Non-Existent in What We Study.” Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 139: 135 – 58.  Google Scholar
  11. Mittermaier, K. 2020. The Hand Behind the Invisible Hand: Dogmatic and Pragmatic Attitudes on Free Markets. Bristol: Bristol University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Mittermaier, K. 2023. A Realist Philosophy of Economics. Bristol: Bristol University Press.  Google Scholar
  13. Montes, L. 2020. “The Relevance of Propriety and Self-Command in Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Social Philosophy and Policy 37 (1): 118 – 37.  Google Scholar
  14. Otteson, J. 2000. “The Recurring ‘Adam Smith Problem’.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 17 (1) 51 – 74.  Google Scholar
  15. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. E. (1976) 1982. “Introduction.” In The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS), Glasgow Edition, 1 – 52. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  16. Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Sen, A. 1995. “Moral Codes and Economic Success.” In Market Capitalism and Moral Values: Proceedings of [1993] Section F (Economics) of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, edited by S. Brittan, P. Hamlin, and P. Hants, 23 – 34. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.  Google Scholar
  18. Smith, A. (1759) 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  19. Smith, A. (1776) 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (WN), 2 vols., Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  20. Smith, A. 1987. Correspondence of Adam Smith (CAS), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  21. Wallis, J. J. and North, D. 1986. “Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870 – 1970.” In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, edited by S. Engerman and R. E. Gallmann, 95 – 162. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  22. Witztum, A. 2016. “Experimental Economics, Game Theory and Das Adam Smith Problem.” Eastern Economic Journal 42 (4): 528 – 56.  Google Scholar

Abstract

In the Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith argued against the account of human nature which views moral sentiments as deriving from self-love. This paper emphasises that Smith’s understanding of human nature was not that it was either selfish or benevolent. Human nature consists of the ability to be either or, and the three powers of the mind actualise this ability. The powers of the mind are will, intellect, and memory, to which correspond respectively the offices of self-command, sympathy, and the impartial spectator. The system of sympathy is an example of what Mittermaier calls an ex-ante fact and allows for a real distinction between vice and virtue. Other distinctions important to Smith include production versus predation and market price versus natural price. This paper develops a model that brings together these real distinctions. It demonstrates the complementarity of the Theory of Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations.