Menu Expand

Libertas ex Machina? Human Freedom, the Invisible Hand, and the Mechanistic Worldview in Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Sasdelli, D. Libertas ex Machina? Human Freedom, the Invisible Hand, and the Mechanistic Worldview in Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 99999(), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.381589
Sasdelli, Diogo "Libertas ex Machina? Human Freedom, the Invisible Hand, and the Mechanistic Worldview in Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 99999., 2024, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.381589
Sasdelli, Diogo (2024): Libertas ex Machina? Human Freedom, the Invisible Hand, and the Mechanistic Worldview in Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 99999, iss. , 1-18, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.2024.381589

Format

Libertas ex Machina? Human Freedom, the Invisible Hand, and the Mechanistic Worldview in Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science

Sasdelli, Diogo

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. (2024), Online First : pp. 1–18

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Diogo Sasdelli, Center for E-Governance, Danube University Krems Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Str. 30 3500 Krems, Austria

References

  1. Böckerstette, H. 1982. Aporien der Freiheit und ihre Aufklärung durch Kant. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog.  Google Scholar
  2. Cropsey, J. 1979. “The Invisible Hand: Moral and Political Considerations.” In Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy: Bicentennial Essays on the Wealth of Nations, edited by G. P. O’Driscoll, 165 – 76. Ames: The Iowa State University Press.  Google Scholar
  3. Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1956. Die Mechanisierung des Weltbildes. Berlin: Springer.  Google Scholar
  4. Fleischacker, S. 2023. “Talking to My Butcher: Self-Interest, Exchange, and Freedom in the Wealth of Nations.” In Interpreting Adam Smith: Critical Essays, edited by P. Sagar, 62 – 76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  5. Hasenjaeger, G. 1962. Einführung in die Grundbegriffe und Probleme der modernen Logik. Freiburg: Karl Alber.  Google Scholar
  6. Herzog, L. 2016. “The normative stakes of economic growth; or, why Adam Smith does not rely on ‘trickle down’.” The Journal of Politics 78 (1): 50 – 62.  Google Scholar
  7. Herzog, L. 2021. “Markets.” Accessed July 19, 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/markets/.  Google Scholar
  8. Horn, K. 2024. “Challenging the clichés: How recent scholarship refreshes the interpretation of Adam Smith’s oeuvre.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik. https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2023-0055.  Google Scholar
  9. Klein, L. R. 1992. “Smith’s Use of Data.” In Adam Smith’s Legacy: His place in the development of modern economics, edited by M. Fry, 15 – 28. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  10. Laplace, P. S. d. 1814. Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Courcier.  Google Scholar
  11. Macfie, A. 1971. “The Invisible Hand of Jupiter.” Journal of the History of Ideas 32 (4): 595 – 9.  Google Scholar
  12. Maier, A. 1938. Die Mechanisierung des Weltbildes im 17. Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Meiner.  Google Scholar
  13. Oslington, P. 2011. “Divine action, providence and Adam Smith’s invisible hand.” In Adam Smith as Theologian, edited by P. Oslington, 61 – 74. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  14. Oslington, P. 2012. “God and the market: Adam Smith’s invisible hand.” Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4): 429 – 38.  Google Scholar
  15. Peaucelle, J.-L. 2012. “Rhetoric and logic in Smith’s Description of the Division of Labor.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (3): 385 – 408.  Google Scholar
  16. Ronge, B. 2021. “Adam Smith.” In Handbuch Liberalismus, edited by M. G. Festl, 21 – 8. Berlin: J. B. Metzler.  Google Scholar
  17. Samuels, W. J. 2007. “Adam Smith’s ‘History of Astronomy’ Argument: How Broadly does it Apply? And where do Propositions Which ‘Sooth the Imagination’ come from?” History of Economic Ideas 15 (2): 53 – 78.  Google Scholar
  18. Schliesser, E. 2017. Adam Smith: Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Skinner, A. S. 1975. “Adam Smith: an Economic Interpretation of History.” In Essays on Adam Smith, edited by A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson, 154 – 78. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  Google Scholar
  20. Smith, A. (1759) 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  21. Smith, A. (1776) 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (WN), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  22. Smith, A. 1982. “The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries; Illustrated by the History of Astronomy (HA).” In Essays on Philosophical Subjects (EPS), Glasgow Edition, 31 – 105. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  23. Smith, A. 1983. “Considerations Concerning the first Formation of Languages (Languages).” In Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (LRBL), Glasgow Edition, 201 – 226. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  24. Stewart, D. 1829. “Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith, LL.D.” In The Works of Dugald Stewart, 3 – 78. Cambridge: Hilliard and Brown.  Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, H. F. 1965. “Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 79 (2): 212 – 33.  Google Scholar
  26. Tinbergen, J. 1992. “Economics: Recent Performance and Future Trends.” In Adam Smith’s Legacy: His place in the development of modern economics, edited by M. Fry, 146 – 65. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  27. Wendt, F. 2021. “Marktwirtschaft.” In Handbuch Liberalismus, edited by M. G. Festl, 233 – 8. Berlin: J. B. Metzler.  Google Scholar
  28. Wolff, C. 1720. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt, den Liebhabern der Wahrheit mitgetheilet. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.  Google Scholar
  29. Worland, S. T. 1976. “Mechanistic Analogy and Smith on Exchange.” Review of Social Economy 34 (3): 245 – 57.  Google Scholar

Abstract

As with many philosophers of the modern period, Smith’s thought was highly influenced by the advent of modern, Newtonian physics as well as by the so-called mechanistic worldview. However, the adoption of this theoretical paradigm leads to an aporia, i. e., to a fundamental problem, within practical philosophy: if the whole universe and all its phenomena are but reduceable to simple mechanical movements of the mechanisms of an all-encompassing “great machine of the world” – and therefore perfectly determined – how could human freedom be possible? How can there by freedom within the machine? The article at hand discusses the adoption of the mechanistic worldview in Smith’s writings and possible Smithian solutions to the aporia. Based on a mainly epistemological interpretation of Smith’s invisible hand metaphor, it is argued, as an attempt at providing a new Smithian solution to the aporia, that Smith did not fully adopt the mechanistic worldview; instead – as in Kantian philosophy –, freedom would ought to be understood as a necessary practical-philosophical assumption underlying human action.