Positive Endogenous Ethics: Smith’s Unique Contribution to Moral Analysis
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Positive Endogenous Ethics: Smith’s Unique Contribution to Moral Analysis
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. (2024), Online First : pp. 1–22
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Amos Witztum, Centre for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences (CPNSS), London School of Economics Houghton Street WC2 A 2AE London, United Kingdom
References
-
Evensky, J. 1987. “The Two Voices of Adam Smith: Moral Philosopher and Social Critic.” History of Political Economy 19 (3): 447 – 68.
Google Scholar -
Fleischacker, S. 1999. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar -
Force, P. 2003. Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar -
Griswold, C. L. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar -
Haerpfer, C., R. Inglehart, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin, and B. Puranen (eds.). 2022. World Values Survey: Round Seven. Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0 (WVS 2017 – 2022). Madrid and Vienna: JD Systems Institute and WVSA Secretariat.
Google Scholar -
Hancock, R. 1963. “A Note on Hare’s The Language of Morals.” The Philosophical Quarterly 13 (50): 56 – 63.
Google Scholar -
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar -
Hume, D. (1740) 1969. Treatise of Human Understanding. London: Penguin Classics.
Google Scholar -
Hutcheson, F. 1728. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections. London: J. Darby & T. Browne.
Google Scholar -
Kant, I. (1785) 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. London: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar -
Kennedy, G. 2011. “The Hidden Adam Smith in his Alleged Theology.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 33 (3): 385 – 402.
Google Scholar -
Mandeville, B. (1714) 1988. The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar -
Polanyi, K. (1944) 2002. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. (1759) 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. (1776) 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (WN), 2 vols., Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence (LJ), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. 1982. Essays on Philosophical Subjects (EPS), Glasgow Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. 1982. “The Principle which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries; Illustrated by the History of Astronomy” (HA), in his Essays on Philosophical Subjects (EPS), 31 – 105.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. 1982. “The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries; Illustrated by the History of Ancient Physics” (HAP), in his Essays on Philosophical Subjects (EPS), 106 – 117.
Google Scholar -
Smith, A. 1982. “The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries; Illustrated by the History of the Ancient Logics and Metaphysics” (HALM), in his Essays on Philosophical Subjects (EPS), 118 – 129.
Google Scholar -
Stewart, D. 1793. “Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith, LL.D. (ALW), in A. Smith (1982), Essays on Philosophical Subjects (EPS), 267 – 351.
Google Scholar -
Viner, J. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez–faire.” Journal of Political Economy 35 (2): 198 – 232.
Google Scholar -
Waterman, A. 2002. “Economics as Theology: Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations.” Southern Economic Journal 68 (4): 907 – 21.
Google Scholar -
Witztum, A. 1997. “Distributional Consideration in Smith’s Concept of Economic Justice.” Economics and Philosophy 13: 242 – 59.
Google Scholar -
Witztum, A. 1998. “A Study into Smith’s Conception of the Human Character: Das Adam Smith Problem Revisited.” History of Political Economy 30 (3): 489 – 513.
Google Scholar -
Witztum, A. and T. J. Young. 2013. “Utilitarianism and the Role of Utility in Adam Smith.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (4): 572 – 602.
Google Scholar -
Witztum, A. 2019. The Betrayal of Liberal Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar -
Young, J. 1986. “The Impartial Spectator and Natural Jurisprudence: An Interpretation of Adam Smith’s Theory of the Natural Price.” History of Political Economy 18 (3): 365 – 82.
Google Scholar
Abstract
There are two elements which make Smith’s ethics unique as well as more universal in nature. The first is that it is a positive theory of ethics in the sense that it is not about what is intrinsically good or just as it is about the way in which people form their opinion about it. The second is that it is embedded in social context in the sense that what lies behind the way in which people form their moral opinion is socially dependent as well as related to the way in which people behave. From an exegetic point of view, this also helps in explaining the dissonance that may exist between Smith’s own views about morals and what he observes as the contemporary prevailing view. Applying this to his economic analysis will yield surprising conclusions which may explain why the Wealth of Nations cannot be seen as a moral advocacy of natural liberty.