Menu Expand

Taxonomy-Aligned Insurance Products

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Frinken, C. Taxonomy-Aligned Insurance Products. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 99999(), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3790/zverswiss.2025.1456806
Frinken, Christian "Taxonomy-Aligned Insurance Products" Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 99999., 2025, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3790/zverswiss.2025.1456806
Frinken, Christian (2025): Taxonomy-Aligned Insurance Products, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, vol. 99999, iss. , 1-25, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zverswiss.2025.1456806

Format

Taxonomy-Aligned Insurance Products

Frinken, Christian

Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Vol. (2025), Online First : pp. 1–25

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Christian Frinken, Universität zu Köln

References

  1. Auffhammer, M. (2018): Quantifying Economic Damages from Climate Change, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives 32(4), pp. 33–52. DOI: 10.1257/jep.32.4.33.  Google Scholar
  2. Chen, S./Ding, X./Lou, P./Song, H. (2022): New evidence of moral hazard: Environmental liability insurance and firms’ environmental performance, in: J of Risk & Insurance 89(3), pp. 581–613. DOI: 10.1111/jori.12380.  Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, S./Kadach, I./Ormazabal, G./Reichelstein, S. (2023): Executive Compensation Tied to ESG Performance: International Evidence, in: Journal of Accounting Research 61(3), pp. 805–853. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12481.  Google Scholar
  4. Dafermos, Y./Nikolaidi, M./Galanis, G. (2018): Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy, in: Ecological Economics 152, pp. 219–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.011.  Google Scholar
  5. Diaz, D./Moore, F. (2017): Quantifying the economic risks of climate change, in: Nature Clim Change 7(11), pp. 774–782. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3411.  Google Scholar
  6. ESMA (2023): Concept of estimates across the EU Sustainable Finance framework. Edited by European Securities and Markets Authority.  Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2022): Commission Notice on the interpretation of certain legal provisions of the Disclosures Delegated Act under Article 8 of EU Taxonomy Regulation on the reporting of eligible economic activities and assets, in: Official Journal of the European Union 65 (C 385), C 385/1 – C 385/19. Available online at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2022.385.01.0001.01.ENG, checked on 02/2023.  Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2023): Draft Commission Notice. On the interpretation and implementation of certain legal provisions of the Disclosures Delegated Act under Article 8 of the EU taxonomy Regulation on the reporting of taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned economic activities and assets (third Commission Notice).  Google Scholar
  9. European Union (2021): Commission delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178. Supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the content and presentation of information to be disclosed by undertakings subject to Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU concerning environmentally sustainable economic activities, and specifying the methodology to comply with that disclosure obligation, in: Official Journal of the European Union 64 (L 443), L 443/9 – L 443/67. Available online at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R2178, checked on 02/2023.  Google Scholar
  10. Farny, D. (2011): Versicherungsbetriebslehre. 5. überarbeitete Auflage. Karlsruhe: VVW.  Google Scholar
  11. Frinken, C. (2023): Compliance with Taxonomy Regulation Disclosures in the German Insurance Market During the Eligibility Transition Period, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 112(4), pp. 311–335. DOI: 10.3790/zverswiss.2023.1429901.  Google Scholar
  12. Hsiang, S./Kopp, R./Jina, A./Rising, J./Delgado, M./Mohan, S. et al. (2017): Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States, in: Science (New York, N.Y.) 356 (6345), pp. 1362–1369. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal4369.  Google Scholar
  13. Knittel, N./Tesselaar, M./Wouter Botzen, W. J./Bachner, G./Tiggeloven, T. (2024): Who bears the indirect costs of flood risk? An economy-wide assessment of different insurance systems in Europe under climate change, in: Economic Systems Research 36(1), pp. 131–160. DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2023.2272211.  Google Scholar
  14. Laffont, J.-J. (1995): Regulation, moral hazard and insurance of environmental risks, in: Journal of Public Economics 58(3), pp. 319–336. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01488-A.  Google Scholar
  15. Li, J./Irfan, M./Samad, S./Ali, B./Zhang, Y./Badulescu, D./Badulescu, A. (2023): The Relationship between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and Health Indicators, in: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(3), p. 2325. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032325.  Google Scholar
  16. McCarthy, H. R./Oren, R./Kim, H.-S./Johnsen, K. H./Maier, C./Pritchard, S. G./Davis, M. A. (2006): Interaction of ice storms and management practices on current carbon sequestration in forests with potential mitigation under future CO2 atmosphere, in: J. Geophys. Res. 111 (D15), Article 2005JD006428. DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006428.  Google Scholar
  17. Mühlberger, M. (2024): Wie aussagekräftig ist die EU-Taxonomie-Berichterstattung von Nicht-Finanzunternehmen? – eine empirische Analyse des EURO STOXX 50, in: KoR – Zeitschrift für internationale und kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung 24 (04), pp. 163–174.  Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, D. R./Adger, W. N./Brown, K. (2007): Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework, in: Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32(1), pp. 395–419. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348.  Google Scholar
  19. Pauly, M. V. (1968): The Economics of Moral Hazard: Comment, in: The American Economic Review 58(3), pp. 531–537. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511528248.009.  Google Scholar
  20. Pecl, G. T./Araújo, M. B./Bell, J. D./Blanchard, J./Bonebrake, T. C./Chen, I. et al. (2017): Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being, in: Science (New York, N.Y.) 355 (6332). DOI: 10.1126/science.aai9214.  Google Scholar
  21. Nicholls, R. J./Hanson, S./Herweijer, C./Patmore, N./Hallegatte, S./Corfee-Morlotiv, J. et al. (2008): Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes: Exposure Estimates. Edited by OECD Environment Working Papers.  Google Scholar
  22. Sannigrahi, S./Pilla, F./Basu, B./Basu, A. S./Sarkar, K./Chakraborti, S. et al. (2020): Examining the effects of forest fire on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production in India using remote sensing approaches, in: The Science of the total environment 725, p. 138331. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331.  Google Scholar
  23. Schneider, S. H./Chen, R. S. (1980): Carbon Dioxide Warming and Coastline Flooding: Physical Factors and Climatic Impact, in: Annu. Rev. Energy. 5(1), pp. 107–140. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.eg.05.110180.000543.  Google Scholar
  24. Shavell, S. (1979): On Moral Hazard and Insurance, in: Q J Econ 93(4), p. 541. DOI: 10.2307/1884469.  Google Scholar
  25. Tesselaar, M./Wouter Botzen, W. J./Robinson, P. J./Aerts, J. C. J. H./Zhou, F. (2022): Charity hazard and the flood insurance protection gap: An EU scale assessment under climate change, in: Ecological Economics 193, pp. 219–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107289.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Einblick in den regulatorischen Rahmen der Taxonomie-Verordnung von Versicherungsunternehmen zur Taxonomiekonformität ihres eigenen Schaden-/Unfallversicherungsgeschäfts. Es kann festgestellt werden, dass die technischen Bewertungskriterien unterschiedlich interpretiert werden können und diese darüber hinaus Anforderungen an Versicherungsprodukte stellen, die sowohl zusätzliche interne Prozesse als auch externe Berichtspflichten auslösen. Ferner kann auch festgestellt werden, dass die Bezugsgrüße der taxonomiefähigen Versicherungsprämien konzeptionell aufgrund einer von der EU-Kommission veröffentlichten Q&A im Zeitverlauf mög­licherweise nicht in gleicher Weise konstant bleiben, wie in anderen Branchen. Die bereitgestellten Informationen sind für Stakeholder von Interesse, hinsichtlich eines besseren Verständnisses und Bewertung der ab 2024 veröffentlichten Zahlen. Die Ergebnisse können darüber hinaus zu einer zielgerichteteren Analyse der gemeldeten KPI für wissenschaftliche Zwecke verwendet werden.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
_Ref169339303 12
_Ref165280663 14
_Ref164498773 16
_CTVL001ef938db308dd40b3a9e965cd236da0f0 22
_CTVL0012962bdfb3b734b5b9854316404c8a2c4 22
_CTVL0019ab9f9cba3814069817d5e103740440a 22
_CTVL0013688ac65f6074b518e2d3871cfc5a246 22
_CTVL0012e7ab5f2e1984873a045b6df0b6e87dc 22
_CTVL00129120fa6a62e4e45b5052127ab320450 22
_CTVL001ceb55f28141c48acaf5c96ab50bcbb58 22
_CTVL001b6c0663f24b4459c8447d7f878a2fccb 23
_CTVL001bbe47053686b414fb139cc451f777f19 23
_CTVL001afe93daa879446c7ba554cd01faba563 23
_CTVL001b81e5b3a9efd42069a30e3b71aeeb5b0 23
_CTVL001a20f82284037423496e79e7aa1511ab7 23
_CTVL001fee3d6be0342494d9082793df1d8a183 23
_CTVL001faa09aeb7acc488e9e230a58bb877289 23
_CTVL001ad03998690224e33b757999e5764322e 23
_CTVL001526d402ff2734152b6aa041c997ff5bb 23
_CTVL0016e77e83e43af4c848110a2b27eaf9724 23
_CTVL00130dcc26a53184874a6acecc4bacaa2a3 23
_CTVL001c6bf542bb39e40ebb5e77825d0595dbd 24
_CTVL0017132437452104c0aa558f060fe67568f 24
_CTVL0012a241610cc924ed88a8dec0a1f260e6c 24
_CTVL0010bd1a4955e114a37ad13cd131764ba8c 24
_CTVL00124b3082b19db46f9a95c933c52b30e0a 24
_CTVL001efaf590686fb415a94f16b80b28ae3b7 24
_CTVL0017085ba2d4039496cacf4c1ec7a27914f 24
Taxonomy-Aligned Insurance Products 1
Abstract 1
Zusammenfassung 1
1. Introduction 2
2. Eligibility of Insurance Products 3
2.1 Reporting Background 3
2.2 General Considerations Regarding Accounting Framework 10
3. Alignment of Insurance Products 12
3.1 Implications for Alignment From Q&A No. 67 12
3.2 Leadership in Modeling and Pricing of Climate Risks 14
3.3 Product Design 16
3.4 Innovative Insurance Coverage Solutions 17
3.5 Data Sharing 18
3.6 High Level of Service in Post-Disaster Situation 19
3.7 DNSH-Criteria 20
4. Summary 21
References 22