Menu Expand

Doctrinal Approaches to Climate Change Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, the European Union, and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Advisory Proceedings

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Pollack, M. Doctrinal Approaches to Climate Change Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, the European Union, and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Advisory Proceedings. German Yearbook of International Law, 67(1), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2025.409902
Pollack, Moritz J. "Doctrinal Approaches to Climate Change Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, the European Union, and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Advisory Proceedings" German Yearbook of International Law 67.1, 2025, 465-486. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2025.409902
Pollack, Moritz J. (2025): Doctrinal Approaches to Climate Change Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, the European Union, and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Advisory Proceedings, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 67, iss. 1, 465-486, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2025.409902

Format

Doctrinal Approaches to Climate Change Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, the European Union, and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Advisory Proceedings

Pollack, Moritz J.

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 67(2024), Iss. 1 : pp. 465–486 | First published online: June 24, 2025

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

NA Moritz J. Pollack, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law 76189 Karlsruhe, Germany

  • The author is a trainee lawyer at the higher regional court of Karlsruhe (OLG). He worked as a research assistant at the Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg and holds a Diploma of the Rhodes Academy of International Oceans Law and Policy.
  • Email
  • ORCID profile
  • Search in Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Moritz J. Pollack\nDoctrinal Approaches to Climate Change Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Germany, the European Union, and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Advisory Proceedings 465
I. Introduction 465
II. Germany’s Position on Jurisdiction and Admissibility 466
III. Absence of Statement on the Merits by Germany 468
A. Germany’s Participation in Advisory Proceedings Before International Courts 468
B. The Participation of Germany, the EU and its Member States Before ITLOS 470
C. Germany’s Endorsement of the EU’s Statement: Strategy or a Question of Attribution? 471
IV. Arguments Comparing the Climate Change Doctrine of the EU and ITLOS 472
A. Question (a): Climate Change and Article 194 UNCLOS 473
1. Making UNCLOS Climate Change Ready 473
2. Specific Climate Change Obligations Under UNCLOS: The Question of Inter-Treaty Relationships 475
B. Question (b): Climate Change and Article 192 UNCLOS 478
C. Between the Lines: The EU’s Approach in the Light of Article 235‍(1) UNCLOS 483
V. Conclusion 485