Menu Expand

Whose Interest is the ‘Best Interest of the Child’? – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision of 1 February 2023 on the Law to Combat Child Marriage

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Knauer, A. Whose Interest is the ‘Best Interest of the Child’? – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision of 1 February 2023 on the Law to Combat Child Marriage. German Yearbook of International Law, 67(1), 419-432. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2025.409903
Knauer, Annika "Whose Interest is the ‘Best Interest of the Child’? – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision of 1 February 2023 on the Law to Combat Child Marriage" German Yearbook of International Law 67.1, 2025, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2025.409903
Knauer, Annika (2025): Whose Interest is the ‘Best Interest of the Child’? – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision of 1 February 2023 on the Law to Combat Child Marriage, in: German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 67, iss. 1, 419-432, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.2025.409903

Format

Whose Interest is the ‘Best Interest of the Child’? – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision of 1 February 2023 on the Law to Combat Child Marriage

Knauer, Annika

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 67(2024), Iss. 1 : pp. 419–432 | First published online: June 24, 2025

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

NA Annika Knauer, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Abstract: This article analyses Germany’s interpretation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) in the context of child marriage. In 2023, the German Constitutional Court declared parts of the ‘Law to Combat Child Marriage’ (LCCM) unconstitutional, challenging the law’s rule on absolute non-recognition of marriages involving spouses under the age of 16. Central to the judgment was the meaning of the ‘best interest of the child’ under Article 3(1) and Article 12(1) CRC, and whether international law demands case-by-case assessments. The article examines the Court’s interpretation of ‘no legal effect’ for child marriages under Article 16(2) CEDAW, its divergence from the views of treaty bodies, and the much-criticized response of lawmakers when they adopted the new ‘Law for the Protection of Minors in Cases of Foreign Marriages’ (LPM) in 2024. It situates Germany’s evolving position within the international debate on combating child marriage while safeguarding the rights and agency of particularly girls.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Annika Knauer\nWhose Interest is the ‘Best Interest of the Child’? – The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision of 1 February 2023 on the Law to Combat Child Marriage 419
I. Forced to Trade Childhood for Adulthood 419
II. International Standards with Regards to Child Marriage 421
A. What is a ‘Child Marriage’? 421
B. The ‘Best Interest of the Child’ – an Opaque Concept? 423
III. The German Amendment in the Law to Combat Child Marriage (LCCM) 425
IV. The Decision of the German Constitutional Court 426
A. Background 427
B. The Arguments 427
C. The German Interpretation of CEDAW and CRC 428
1. ‘No Legal Effect’ for Child Marriages Under Article 16‍(2) CEDAW 428
2. The ‘Best Interest of the Child’ Under Articles 3‍(1) and 12‍(1) CRC 429
V. Further Developments 431