Menu Expand

Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Meinard, Y. Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management. Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, 1(1), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461910
Meinard, Yves "Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management" Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems 1.1, 2025, 195-214. https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461910
Meinard, Yves (2025): Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management, in: Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, vol. 1, iss. 1, 195-214, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461910

Format

Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management

Meinard, Yves

Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, Vol. 1(2025), Iss. 1 : pp. 195–214 | First published online: September 25, 2025

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Yves Meinard, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Gilles Gaston Granger (UMR 7304), Aix-en-Provence, France.

References

  1. Alphandéry, Pierre/Fortier, Agnès (2001): “Can a Territorial Policy Be Based on Science Alone? The System for Creating the Natura 2000 Network in France.” Sociologia Ruralis 41(3): 311–28. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00185.  Google Scholar
  2. Bascompte, Jordl/Solé, Ricard V. (1995): “Rethinking Complexity: Modelling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10(9): 361–66. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89134-X.  Google Scholar
  3. Biondi, E. (2011): “Phytosociology Today: Methodological and Conceptual Evolution.” Plant Biosystems – An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 145(sup1): 19–29. doi:10.1080/11263504.2011.602748.  Google Scholar
  4. Buchs, Arnaud/Hassenforder, Emeline/Meinard, Yves (2021): “Adapting Participatory Processes to Fine-Tune Conservation Approaches in Multiactor Decision Settings.” Conservation Biology 35(3): 804–15. doi:10.1111/cobi.13654.  Google Scholar
  5. Burgman, Mark (2005): Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614279.  Google Scholar
  6. Choulak, Mourad/Marage, Damien/Gisbert, Manon/Paris, Mélanie/Meinard, Yves (2019): “A Meta-Decision-Analysis Approach to Structure Operational and Legitimate Environmental Policies – With an Application to Wetland Prioritization.” Science of The Total Environment 655: 384–94. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.202.  Google Scholar
  7. Custer, Gordon F./Dini-Andreote, Francisco (2022): “Embracing Complexity in Ecosystem Response to Global Change.” Environmental Science & Technology 56(14): 9832–34. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c02817.  Google Scholar
  8. Dereniowska, Małgorzata/Meinard, Yves (2021): “The Unknownness of Biodiversity: Its Value and Ethical Significance for Conservation Action.” Biological Conservation 260: 109199. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109199.  Google Scholar
  9. Evans, Doug (2010): “Interpreting the Habitats of Annex I: Past, Present and Future.” Acta Botanica Gallica 157(4): 677–86. doi:10.1080/12538078.2010.10516241.  Google Scholar
  10. Evans, Douglas (2012): “Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 Network.” Nature Conservation 1: 11–26. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.1.1808.  Google Scholar
  11. Ferraro, Paul J./Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. (2006): “Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments.” PLOS Biology 4(4): e105. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105.  Google Scholar
  12. Fraisopi, Fausto (2012): La complexité et les phénomènes: nouvelles ouvertures entre science et philosophie. Hermann.  Google Scholar
  13. Hobbs, Richard J./Higgs, Eric/Harris, James A. (2009): “Novel Ecosystems: Implications for Conservation and Restoration.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24(11): 599–605. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012.  Google Scholar
  14. Hooker, Cliff (2011): Philosophy of Complex Systems. Elsevier.  Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, Andrew L. R. (2018): Conserving Europe’s Wildlife: Law and Policy of the Natura 2000 Network of Protected Areas. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315471211.  Google Scholar
  16. Jarić, Ivan/Quétier, Fabien/Meinard, Yves (2019): “Procrustean Beds and Empty Boxes: On the Magic of Creating Environmental Data.” Biological Conservation 237: 248–52. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.006.  Google Scholar
  17. Jeanmougin, Martin/Dehais, Camille/Meinard, Yves (2017): “Mismatch between Habitat Science and Habitat Directive: Lessons from the French (Counter) Example.” Conservation Letters 10(5): 634–44. doi:10.1111/conl.12330.  Google Scholar
  18. Lazare, Jean-Jacques (2019): “Comment La Symphytosociologie Permet d’exercer Un Rétrocontrôle de La Phytosociologie.” 5: 101–8.  Google Scholar
  19. Meinard, Yves (2021): Penser La Biodiversité. Hermann. https://www.editions-hermann.fr/livre/9791037010025 (December 27, 2021).  Google Scholar
  20. Meinard, Yves (2022): “The Foucauldian Approach to Conservation: Pitfalls and Genuine Promises.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44(2): 25. doi:10.1007/s40656-022-00509-8.  Google Scholar
  21. Meinard, Yves (2023): “De la faculté de juger les zones humides.” Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie 14(2). doi:10.4000/developpementdurable.23113.  Google Scholar
  22. Meinard, Yves/Barreteau, Olivier/Boschet, Christophe/Daniell, Katherine A./Ferrand, Nils/Girard, Sabine/Guillaume, Joseph H. A. et al. (2021): “What Is Policy Analytics? An Exploration of 5 Years of Environmental Management Applications.” Environmental Management 67(5): 886–900. doi:10.1007/s00267-020-01408-z.  Google Scholar
  23. Meinard, Yves/Cailloux, Olivier (2020): “On Justifying the Norms Underlying Decision Support.” European Journal of Operational Research 285(3): 1002–10. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.022.  Google Scholar
  24. Meinard, Yves/Georges, Jean-Yves (2025): “Frontiers of Conservation.” Conservation Biology e14432.doi:10.1111/cobi.14432.  Google Scholar
  25. Osorio, Angela/Schmitt, Laurent/Badariotti, Dominique/Meinard, Yves (2024): “Evaluating Guidelines as Key Components of Conservation Policies: A Conceptual Framework and a Pilot Application.” Environmental Conservation: 1–10. doi:10.1017/S0376892924000055.  Google Scholar
  26. Wiesner, Karoline/Ladyman, James (2020): Measuring complexity. arXiv:1909.13243v2.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management

The concept of ecosystem is often presented as a paragon of complexity. Accordingly, ecology plays a key role in the intellectual landscape of complexity. However, complexity-associated concepts or, more broadly, ideas, are by and large absent from environmental policies and environmental management practice. This text is devoted to understanding this predicament, and proposing solutions to overcome it. I start by showing that, in environmental management practice, one unmistakably and systematically witnesses “traces of complexity”, defined as evidence that complex processes are at play, without one being rigorously in a position to prove the existence of this complexity, for lack of deployment of the needed conceptual and technical apparatus. I then argue that this lack of conceptual tools and techniques betrays a generalized “flight from complexity”, i. e., a systematic, active ignorance and eschewing of the issue of complexity. This flight from complexity materializes through various processes that I inventory. Based on this two-fold diagnosis, I champion what I call a “procedural” approach, which aims to spark off consciousness of the significance of general issues associated with complexity, including uncertainty, indeterminacy and unpredictability, by shaking up people’s reliance on the seemingly firm ground provided by accepted knowledge, existing models and representations, allegedly reliable data and supposedly solid previsions.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Yves Meinard: Embarking Complexity in Environmental Management 195