Are Botanical Trees Graph-Theoretic Trees? The Ups and Downs of the Network Approach to Plant Growth
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Are Botanical Trees Graph-Theoretic Trees? The Ups and Downs of the Network Approach to Plant Growth
Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, Vol. 1(2025), Iss. 1 : pp. 141–156 | First published online: September 25, 2025
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Franck Varenne, University of Rouen Normandie (France) & ERIAC (UR 4705).
References
-
Bejan, Adrian/Lorente, Sylvie: The constructal law of design and evolution in nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365, 2010, pp. 1335–1347, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0302.
Google Scholar -
Cayley, Arthur: On the theory of an analytical form called trees, Philosophical Magazine, 1857, pp. 172–176.
Google Scholar -
Cohn, David Lionel: Optimal systems: I. The vascular system, Bulletin of mathematical biophysics, vol. 16, 1954, pp. 59–74.
Google Scholar -
Euler, Leonard: Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis, Mémoires de l’Académie des sciences de Berlin, Berlin 1735.
Google Scholar -
Hallé, Francis/Oldeman, Roelof A. A./Tomlinson, P. Barry: Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis, New York 1978.
Google Scholar -
Honda, Hisao: Description of the form of trees by the parameters of the tree-like body: effects of the branching angle and the branch length on the shape of the tree-like body. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1971, 31(2), pp. 331–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90191-3.
Google Scholar -
Lindenmayer, Aristid: Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1968, 18, pp. 280–299.
Google Scholar -
Lindenmayer, Aristid: Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. II. Simple and branching filaments with two-sided inputs. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1968, 18, pp. 300–315.
Google Scholar -
Lodder, Jerry: Networks and Spanning Trees: The Juxtaposition of Prüfer and Borůvka, Primus, 2014, 24(8), pp. 737–752, https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2014.896835.
Google Scholar -
Prusinkiewicz, Przemyslaw/Lindenmayer, Aristid: The algorithmic beauty of plants, New York, 1990.
Google Scholar -
Rashevsky, Nicolas: Topology and life: In search of general mathematical principles in biology and sociology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1954, 16, pp. 317–348, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484495.
Google Scholar -
Rashevsky, Nicolas: A contribution to the search of general mathematical principles in biology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1958, 20, pp. 71–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476561.
Google Scholar -
Rashevsky, Nicolas: Neurocybernetics as a particular case of general regulatory mechanisms in biological and social organisms, L’Âge de la science, n°4, Paris 1968, pp. 243–258.
Google Scholar -
Reffye, Philippe de/Kang, Mengzhen/Jaeger, Marc/Zhang, Baogui (eds.): Plant Model Greenlab for Botany and Agronomy, Springer Singapore 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7541-5.
Google Scholar -
Varenne, Franck: Du modèle à la simulation informatique, Paris 2007.
Google Scholar -
Varenne, Franck: Formaliser le vivant: lois, théories, modèles?, Paris 2010.
Google Scholar -
Varenne, Franck: Diversité des biologies théoriques face aux complexités du vivant. In: Glade, Nicolas/Stéphanou, Angélique (eds.): Le vivant critique et chaotique, Paris, 2015, pp. 21–71.
Google Scholar -
Varenne, Franck: From Models to Simulations, New York 2018, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159904.
Google Scholar -
Varenne, Franck: Preface. In: Reffye, Philippe de/Kang, Mengzhen/Jaeger, Marc/Zhang, Baogui (eds.): Plant Model Greenlab for Botany and Agronomy, Springer Singapore 2025, pp. v–ix, https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm:978-981-97-7541-5/1.
Google Scholar -
Wilson, Robin J.: Introduction to Graph Theory, 4th edition, Edinburgh Gate 1996.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Are Botanical Trees Graph-Theoretic Trees? The Ups and Downs of the Network Approach to Plant Growth
Because of their vascular nature, showing differentiated and spatially distributed organs, it may at first seem obvious to use an algebraic topology approach, in particular graph theory, to mathematically model higher plants such as trees. In this paper I will show that a network approach to modelling plants is, not surprisingly, an old one. However, by taking a historical and epistemological look at more recent work, I will show that such an approach – while seductive with each new generation of researchers – has regularly encountered multiple obstacles, especially in the modelling of individual plants. To explain the recurring nature of this renewed but often disappointing fascination with networks, I would like to suggest that in the case of plants, perhaps earlier than in many other living systems, it is necessary to refuse to separate the topology – be it algebraic and graphical in the sense of graph theory – from the dynamics of the emergence of this topology in concrete and anisotropic geometric space, nor from the functional mechanisms at work in this space. This is where the network approach may still reach its limits. To illustrate this, I will finally and briefly evoke recent integrative functional-structural models of plant growth that have abandoned the network approach in favour of a mixed algebraic-stochastic-geometric approach.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franck Varenne: Are Botanical Trees Graph-Theoretic Trees? The Ups and Downs of the Network Approach to Plant Growth | 141 |