Menu Expand

Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity

  1. Journals
  2. Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems
  3. Vol. 1, Issue 1
  4. pp. 79–106

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Llored, J. Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity. Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, 1(1), 79-106. https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461909
Llored, Jean-Pierre "Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity" Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems 1.1, 2025, 79-106. https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461909
Llored, Jean-Pierre (2025): Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity, in: Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, vol. 1, iss. 1, 79-106, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461909
Format
Download

Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity

Llored, Jean-Pierre

Yearbook for Philosophy of Complex Systems, Vol. 1(2025), Iss. 1 : pp. 79–106 | First published online: September 25, 2025

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/pcs.2025.1461909
Language
German
Pages
28
Keywords

Pricing

Individual
€ 28.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Prof. Dr. Eng. Jean-Pierre Noël Llored, Enseignant-chercheur habilité permanent, Associate Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences, Foundation Ecole Centrale Casablanca, Morocco.

References

  1. Atlan, H. (2011): Le vivant post-génomique ou qu’est-ce que l’auto-organisation? Paris, Odile Jacob.  Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. (1947): Le rationnalisme appliqué. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.  Google Scholar
  3. Banchetti-Robino, M./Villani, G. (2023): From the Atom to Living Systems. A Chemical and Physical Journey into Modern and Contemporary Science. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  4. Banchetti-Robino, M./Llored, J.-P. (2016): Reality without reification: Philosophy of chemistry’s contribution to philosophy of mind. In: Scerri, E./Fisher, G. (eds.): Essays in the philosophy of chemistry. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 77–107.  Google Scholar
  5. Beisbart, C. (2021): Opacity thought through: on the transparency of computer simulations, Synthese 199: 11643–11666.  Google Scholar
  6. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2012): Matière à penser. Essais d’histoire et de philosophie de la chimie. Paris, Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre.  Google Scholar
  7. Bensaude-Vincent, B./Simon, J. (2008): Chemistry. The Impure Science. London, Imperial College Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2005): Faut-il avoir peur de la chimie? Villerurbanne, Ed. de la découverte.  Google Scholar
  9. Bensaude-Vincent, B./Stengers, I. (1996): A history of chemistry. Harvard, Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  10. Berque, A. (2019): An enquiry into the ontological and logical foundations of sustainability: Toward a conceptual integration of the interface ‘Nature/Humanity’. Global Sustainability 2, e 13: 1–10.  Google Scholar
  11. Berque, A. (2014a): La mésologie, pourquoi et pour quoi faire? Paris, Presses universitaires de Paris Ouest.  Google Scholar
  12. Berque, A. (2014b): Poétique de la Terre. Histoire naturelle et histoire humaine, essai de mésologie. Paris, Belin.  Google Scholar
  13. Berque, A. (2009): Ecoumène. Introduction à l’étude des milieux humains. Paris, Belin.  Google Scholar
  14. Bonjour, L. (1985): The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  15. Bunge, M. (2014): Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Canguilhem, G. (1965): La connaissance de la vie. Paris, Vrin.  Google Scholar
  17. Cartwright, N. (1999): The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  18. Chang, H. (2004): Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Couloubaritsis, L. (2015): La philosophie face à la question de la complexité. Le défi majeur du 21ème siècle, Tome 1 (Complexités intuitive, archaïque et historique, 2014), Tome 2 (Complexités scientifique et contemporaine), Éditions Ousia. Bruxelles.  Google Scholar
  20. Dupré, J. (2014): Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Fraisopi, F. (2012): La complexité et les phénomènes. Nouvelles ouvertures entre science et philosophie. Hermann.  Google Scholar
  22. Gaget, H. (2025): La pensée des ingénieurs face à la complexité. Editions matériologiques.  Google Scholar
  23. Harré, R. (2013): Affordances and hinges: New tools in the Philosophy of Chemistry. In: Llored, Jean-Pierre (ed.): The Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologies, and Concepts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 580–596.  Google Scholar
  24. Harré, R./Llored, J.-P. (2019): The analysis of practices. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.  Google Scholar
  25. Harré, R./Llored, J.-P. (2013): Mereologies and molecules. Foundations of Chemistry, 15(2): 127–144.  Google Scholar
  26. Harré, R./Llored, J.-P. (2011): Mereologies as the grammars of chemical discourses. Foundations of Chemistry, 13: 63–76.  Google Scholar
  27. Holmes, F. L. (1996): The Communal Context for Etienne-François Geoffroy’s “Table des rapports”. Science in Context, vol. 9: 289–311.  Google Scholar
  28. James, W. (1909): A Pluralistic Universe. Longmans and Co.  Google Scholar
  29. Ladyman, J./Wiesner, C. (2020): What is a complex system? New Haven – London, Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  30. Lewes, G. H. (1875): Problems of Life and Mind. First series: The foundations of a creed, vol. 2. Osgood R. and Company.  Google Scholar
  31. Llored, J.-P. (2024): Experimentation in chemistry. In: Allamel-Raffin, Catherine/Gangloff, Jean-Luc/Gingras, Yves (eds.): Experimentation in the Sciences. Comparative and Long-Term Historical Research on Experimental Practice. Springer, Archimedes 72, 21–34.  Google Scholar
  32. Llored, J.-P. (2022): The Elimination of the Holism-Reductionism Dichotomy Through the Analysis of Quantum Chemistry. In: Lombardi Olimpia/Martinez Gonzalez Juan-Camillo (eds.): The Foundations of Quantum Chemistry, Synthese Library Collection, Springer: 52–86.  Google Scholar
  33. Llored, J.-P. (2021): Chemistry and Measurement. Some Philosophical Lessons. In: de Courtenay, Nadine/Grégis, Fabien (eds.): Measurement at the crossroads. The MIT Press Journals, coll. “Perspectives on Science”, vol. 29(4): 111–142.  Google Scholar
  34. Llored, J.-P. (2014): Wholes and Parts in Quantum Chemistry: Some Mereological and Philosophical Consequences. HYLE, International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry, Vol. 20: 141–163.  Google Scholar
  35. Lombardi, O./Labarca, M. (2005): The ontological autonomy of the chemical world. Foundations of Chemistry, 7: 125–148.  Google Scholar
  36. Mitchell, M. (2009): Complexity. A Guided Tour. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  37. Morin, E. (2008): On Complexity. Northampton, Hampton Press.  Google Scholar
  38. Prigogine, I./Nicolis, G. (1989): Exploring complexity. An introduction. W. H. Freeman & Co.  Google Scholar
  39. Prigogine, I./Stengers, I. (1984): Order out of Chaos. New York, Bantam.  Google Scholar
  40. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2005): Gaston Bachelard and the Notion of “Phenomenotechnique”. Perspectives on Science, Volume 13, Number 3: 313–328.  Google Scholar
  41. Rossignol, J.-Y. (2018): Complexité: Fondamentaux à l’usage des étudiants et des professionnels. EDP Science.  Google Scholar
  42. Ruthenberg, K./Van Brakel, J. (eds.) (2008): Stuff. The Nature of Chemical Substances. Würzburg, Konigshausen & Neumann.  Google Scholar
  43. Schummer, J. (2010): The Philosophy of Chemistry. In: Allhoff Fritz (ed.): Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide. Blackwell-Wiley: 163–183.  Google Scholar
  44. Schummer, J. (2001): Ethics of Chemical Synthesis. Hyle, International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 7 (2): 103–124.  Google Scholar
  45. Schummer, J. (1998): The Chemical Core of Chemistry I: A Conceptual Approach. Hyle, International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 4/2: 129–162.  Google Scholar
  46. Simões, A./Gavroglu, K. (2011): Neither physics, nor chemistry. A history of quantum chemistry. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  47. Simondon, G. (1964): L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.  Google Scholar
  48. Souriau, E. (2009 [1943]): Les différents modes d’existence, Presses Universitaires de France.  Google Scholar
  49. Stengers, I. (2023): Making Sense in Common. A Reading of Whitehead in Times of Collapse. University of Minnesota Press [original in French (2020). Réactiver le sens commun. Lecture de Whitehead en temps de débâcle. Villerurbane, Ed. de la découverte].  Google Scholar
  50. Timmermans, J. (1941): Species in chemistry. MacMillan and Co, translated by Oesper R. E. from the revised French version “La notion d’espèce en chimie”. Paris, Gauthier-Villars & Cie (1928).  Google Scholar
  51. Von Uexküll, J. (1965): Mondes animaux et monde humain, suivi de Théorie de la signification, trad. Ph. Muller, Paris, Denoël, 1965.  Google Scholar
  52. Villani, G. (2017): Chemistry: A systematic complexity science. Pisa, University Press.  Google Scholar
  53. Wimsatt, W. (1976): Reductive explanation: A functional account. In: Michalos, A. C. et al. (eds.): Boston studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 30: 671–710.  Google Scholar
  54. Wittgenstein, L. (1953): Philosophical Investigations. London, Blackwell.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity

Starting with Wittgenstein’s approach to “family resemblances”, the first part of this paper sets out to clarify the notions of complexity and complex systems. This will lead me to take a closer look at modeling practices at different scales. Then, I propose to show that the sensitivity to the surroundings – which plays a constitutive part in what a complex system can do, the temporary stabilization of an order and structure, the methodological and pragmatic pluralism that articulates numerous methods, models, approximations and scientific representations with diverse instrumentations – gain in clarity and are better understood when we refer to chemical practices and mesology. In the second part of the paper, I will show that, for a huge number of reasons linked to its objects, to the co-dependence of chemical bodies and transformations which is in turn dependent on associated media, and to the methodological pluralism of chemists, the philosophy of chemistry can provide some very interesting elements for approaching the study of complexity and complex systems. In such a framework mereology is not just about wholes and parts, and the concepts of affordances, transductive relations and associated media can provide a distance from the metaphysics of individuals, that can be problematic when the question of complexity comes into play. More briefly, I will point out in the third and last part of this paper, how mesology, by extending the link of mutual dependence between living beings and associated media, offers in turn valuable conceptual tools, such as mediance, concrescence, Umwelt, trajection and trajective chains, for thinking about complexity and complex systems.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Jean-Pierre Llored: Contributions of the Philosophy of Chemistry and Mesology to the Conceptual Analysis of Complexity 79

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2025 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Publishing Platform by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.