Menu Expand

Dryden’s (Excessive) Remorse about the ›Licentiousness‹ of his Comedies and his Part Rejection of Collier in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia«

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Auberlen, E. Dryden’s (Excessive) Remorse about the ›Licentiousness‹ of his Comedies and his Part Rejection of Collier in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia«. Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch, 66(1), 221-260. https://doi.org/10.3790/ljb.2025.1466208
Auberlen, Eckhard "Dryden’s (Excessive) Remorse about the ›Licentiousness‹ of his Comedies and his Part Rejection of Collier in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia«" Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 66.1, 2025, 221-260. https://doi.org/10.3790/ljb.2025.1466208
Auberlen, Eckhard (2025): Dryden’s (Excessive) Remorse about the ›Licentiousness‹ of his Comedies and his Part Rejection of Collier in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia«, in: Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch, vol. 66, iss. 1, 221-260, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ljb.2025.1466208

Format

Dryden’s (Excessive) Remorse about the ›Licentiousness‹ of his Comedies and his Part Rejection of Collier in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia«

Auberlen, Eckhard

Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch, Vol. 66(2025), Iss. 1 : pp. 221–260 | First published online: November 21, 2025

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Auberlen, Eckhard

References

  1. Boccaccio, Giovanni: Decameron, transl. G. H. McWilliam (Penguin Classics), 2nd ed., London 1995.  Google Scholar
  2. Boccaccio, Giovanni: Il Decameron, Edizione critica a cura di Aldo Rossi, Bologna 1977.  Google Scholar
  3. The Book of Common Prayer. The Texts of 1549, 1559, and 1662, ed. Brian Cummings, Oxford 2013.  Google Scholar
  4. Collier, Jeremy: A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage, London 1698.  Google Scholar
  5. Collier, Jeremy: A Defence of A Short View of the Profaneness and Immorality of the English Stage, London 1699.  Google Scholar
  6. Congreve, William: Amendments of Mr. Collier’s False and Imperfect Citations, &c. in: ib.: The Works of William Congreve, ed. D. F. McKenzie, prep. for publ. by C. Y. Ferdinand, 3 vols., Oxford 2011, vol. 3, 73–124.  Google Scholar
  7. Dryden, John: The Works of John Dryden, ed. Vinton A. Dearing, Edward Niles Hooker, Alan Roper, H. T. Swedenberg, Jr., 20 vols., Berkeley 1961–2000.  Google Scholar
  8. Tillotson, John: The Evil of Corrupt Communication, in: ib.: The Works of the most Reverend Dr. John Tillotson, with a Life of the Author, ed. Thomas Birch, 10 vols., London 1820, vol. 9, 96–115.  Google Scholar
  9. Tillotson, John: The Wisdom of Being Religious, London 1664.  Google Scholar
  10. Auberlen, Eckhard: Shakespeare in the Restoration: Puritan Austerity and Its Cure in Davenant’s Adaptation of Measure for Measure, in: Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 51 (2003), 437–451.  Google Scholar
  11. Auberlen, Eckhard: The Neglected Answers to Jeremy Collier as an Aid for a Reassessment of the Controversy about the Immorality of Restoration Comedies, in: Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 65 (2024), 153–185.  Google Scholar
  12. Bornkamm, Günther: Paulus, Stuttgart 1969.  Google Scholar
  13. Cordner, Michael: Playwright versus Priest. Profanity and the Wit of Restoration Comedy, in: The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre, ed. Deborah Payne Fisk, Cambridge 2000, 209–225.  Google Scholar
  14. Crane, David (ed.): John Dryden: Marriage-à-la-Mode, London 1991.  Google Scholar
  15. Davis, J. C.: Fear, Myth and History. The Ranters and the Historians, Cambridge 1986.  Google Scholar
  16. Fisk, Deborah Payne (ed.): Four Restoration Libertine Plays, New York 2005.  Google Scholar
  17. Flasch, Kurt: Lobrede auf Boccaccio, Basel 2003.  Google Scholar
  18. Flasch, Kurt: Vernunft und Vergnügen. Liebesgeschichten aus dem Decameron, Munich 2002.  Google Scholar
  19. Hardt, Manfred: Geschichte der italienischen Literatur, Düsseldorf/Zurich 1996.  Google Scholar
  20. Hastings, Robert A.: Nature and Reason in the Decameron, Manchester 1975.  Google Scholar
  21. Hill, Christopher: The World Turned Upside Down. Radical Ideas during the English Revolution, 1972, Harmondsworth 1975.  Google Scholar
  22. Hume, Robert D.: The Rakish Stage. Studies in English Drama, 1660–1800, Carbondale/Edwardsville 1983.  Google Scholar
  23. Jordan, Robert: The Extravagant Rake in Restoration Comedy, in: Restoration Literature, ed. Harold Love, London 1972, 69–90.  Google Scholar
  24. King, Bruce: Dryden’s Major Plays, Edinburgh 1966.  Google Scholar
  25. Krutch, Joseph Wood: Comedy and Conscience after the Restoration, New York 1924.  Google Scholar
  26. Migiel, Marilyn: A Rhetoric of the Decameron, Toronto 2003.  Google Scholar
  27. Olson, Glending: Literature as Recreation in the Later Middle Ages, Ithaca/London 1982.  Google Scholar
  28. Reverand II, Cedric D.: Dryden’s Final Poetic Mode. The Fables, Philadelphia 1988.  Google Scholar
  29. Settari, Lisa: Götterfunke und Rape Culture, in: Barfuss: Das Südtiroler Onlinemagazin 9.5.2020, https://www.barfuss.it/meinung/goetterfunken-und-rape-culture/ (last access 8.7.2025).  Google Scholar
  30. Smith, John Harrington: The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy, 1948, New York 1971.  Google Scholar
  31. Underwood, Dale: Etherege and the Seventeenth-Century Comedy of Manners, New Haven1957.  Google Scholar
  32. Wachinger, Burghart: Erzählen für die Gesundheit. Diätetik und Literatur im Mittelalter, Heidelberg 2001.  Google Scholar
  33. Winn, James Anderson: John Dryden and His World, New Haven 1987.  Google Scholar

Abstract

John Dryden was the only playwright targeted by Jeremy Collier who responded with a confession, yet he blamed the moral decline on the Carolean court rather than the stage. In fact, Marriage-à-la-Mode, written at the height of his favour at court, does not truly embrace the provocative libertine doctrines, for which his then-patron, the Earl of Rochester, was notorious. Although the play opens with an exuberant celebration of libertine ideals, it progressively engages in their forceful refutation – making Dryden’s later remorse appear excessive. Still, disillusioned in retrospect with the Carolean era, Dryden came to regret having gone too far (in that play and elsewhere) in dramatizing a hedonistic view of gender relations, which he felt had »prophan’d [the] Heav’nly Gift of Poesy« by pandering to an »adult’rate age«. In Fables, Ancient and Modern (1700) he vows to avoid any »irreverent Expression, or […] Thought too wanton«. Even so, he remained wary of the Reformers’ zeal, fearing its stifling effect on creativity and rejecting their wholesale denigration of sexuality. Dryden found a way out of this dilemma in his adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia«. Viewed in the context of his lifelong struggle in positioning himself morally in a changing world, this rejoinder to Collier warrants greater attention than it has so far received in modern scholarship. It complements Congreve’s and Vanbrugh’s defences based on the characteristics of drama as an art form, by focusing specifically on sexual ethics as the central point of contention in the controversy. Dryden demonstrates that – through its capacity to evoke and examine lifelike situations – poetry can clearly distinguish between sexuality’s civilizing and destructive potentials. Together, these responses to Collier assert drama’s right to be judged by standards other than those wryly alluded to by Vanbrugh as practised by the »College of Divines«.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Eckhard Auberlen: Dryden’s (Excessive) Remorse about the ›Licentiousness‹ of his Comedies and his Part Rejection of Collier in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s »Cimone ed Efigenia« 221
Abstract 221
I. Drama as »Corrupt Communication«: The Church’s Response to the Reception of Libertinism in the Theatre 223
II. Dryden’s Involvement in the Reception of Libertinism: The Morality of Marriage-à-la-Mode 227
III. Dryden’s Remorse: From the Killigrew Ode to his Epilogue to Fletcher’s The Pilgrim and his Plea for a New Beginning in his Secular Masque 242
IV. From Dryden’s Lasting Uneasiness with the Reformers to his Defence of Love Poetry in his Adaptation of Boccaccio’s Cimone ed Efigenia 245
Primary Sources 258
Secondary Sources 259