Gottfried Benns Gladiolen: schön, böse, zerrissen
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Gottfried Benns Gladiolen: schön, böse, zerrissen
Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch, Vol. 66(2025), Iss. 1 : pp. 279–289 | First published online: November 21, 2025
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Dutt, Carsten
References
-
Benn, Gottfried: Sämtliche Werke. Stuttgarter Ausgabe in Verbindung mit Ilse Benn † hg. von Gerhard Schuster (Bände I–V) und Holger Hof (Bände VI–VII/2), Stuttgart 1986–2003.
Google Scholar -
Benn, Gottfried/Oelze, Friedrich Wilhelm: Briefwechsel 1932–1956. Band 3: 1949–1950, hg. und kommentiert von Harald Steinhagen und Holger Hof, Göttingen 2016.
Google Scholar -
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang: West-Östlicher Divan. Neue, völlig revidierte Ausgabe, hg. Hendrik Birus. Teilband I, Berlin 2010.
Google Scholar -
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang: Werke. Hamburger Ausgabe, Bd. 1: Gedichte und Epen I. Textkritisch durchgesehen und kommentiert von Erich Trunz, München 1982.
Google Scholar -
Dutt, Carsten: Melancholie, in: Hanna, Christian M./Reents, Friederike (Hgg.): Gottfried Benn-Handbuch, Stuttgart 2016, 337–339.
Google Scholar -
Dutt, Carsten: Religion und Metaphysik der Form, in: Gottfried Benn-Handbuch, a.a.O., 341–347.
Google Scholar -
Hannum, Hunter G.: Gottfried Benn’s »Gladiolen«, in: Modern Language Quarterly 22 (1961), 167–180.
Google Scholar -
Wellershoff, Dieter: Gottfried Benn – Phänotyp dieser Stunde, Köln/Berlin 1958.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Gottfried Benn’s Gladiolen: Beautiful, Evil, Torn
This article offers a new interpretation of Gottfried Benn’s late poem Gladiolen (1950), challenging earlier readings that align it with his often-quoted 1936 lyric Wer allein ist –. It argues that Gladiolen is a profoundly metapoetic text that probes the tensions between nature and art, utility and aesthetic autonomy. Through a close reading of its distinctive neologisms, tonal shifts, and paradoxical ekphrastic imagery, the analysis shows how the poem both invokes and rejects consoling notions of artistic permanence and perfection. In its final stanza, Gladiolen enacts a stark confrontation with transience and fragmentation, culminating in a dissonant triad – »beautiful, evil, or torn« – that unsettles traditional ideals of poetic Vollendung (completion). By situating the poem within the context of Benn’s evolving poetics and modernist skepticism, the article demonstrates how Gladiolen exemplifies the radical ambivalence and aesthetic rupture that define his late work’s departure from both Romantic and Neoclassical models of art and poetry.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carsten Dutt: Gottfried Benns Gladiolen: schön, böse, zerrissen | 279 | ||
| Abstract | 279 | ||
| Primärliteratur | 288 | ||
| Sekundärliteratur | 289 |