Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Heidbrink, L., Klonschinski, A. Nudges, Transparenz und Autonomie – Eine normativ gehaltvolle Kategorisierung von Maßnahmen des Nudgings. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 87(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.1.15
Heidbrink, Ludger and Klonschinski, Andrea "Nudges, Transparenz und Autonomie – Eine normativ gehaltvolle Kategorisierung von Maßnahmen des Nudgings" Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 87.1, 2018, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.1.15
Heidbrink, Ludger/Klonschinski, Andrea (2018): Nudges, Transparenz und Autonomie – Eine normativ gehaltvolle Kategorisierung von Maßnahmen des Nudgings, in: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 87, iss. 1, 15-27, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.1.15

Format

Nudges, Transparenz und Autonomie – Eine normativ gehaltvolle Kategorisierung von Maßnahmen des Nudgings

Heidbrink, Ludger | Klonschinski, Andrea

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 87 (2018), Iss. 1 : pp. 15–27

3 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Ludger Heidbrink, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

Andrea Klonschinski, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

Cited By

  1. Products for Conscious Consumers

    Nudging and Boosting towards Sustainable Food Choices – A Systematic Literature Review of Cognitively Oriented Measures

    Winterstein, Julia

    2022

    https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-837-120221007 [Citations: 1]
  2. Nudging digital physical activity breaks for home studying of university students—A randomized controlled trial during the COVID-19 pandemic with daily activity measures

    Teuber, Monika | Leyhr, Daniel | Moll, Juliane | Sudeck, Gorden

    Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, Vol. 4 (2022), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1024996 [Citations: 3]
  3. Digitale Wahlkämpfe

    Nudging in der politischen Online-Kommunikation – Wie die Politik Wahlentscheidungen beeinflusst

    Johann, Michael | Dombrowski, Jana

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39008-2_9 [Citations: 1]

Abstract

The debate on the legitimacy of nudging is hampered by the absence of a clear definition of what a nudge is. Given that the attempt to limit the term „nudge" to interventions exploiting cognitive biases has not been accepted in the literature and since the respective interventions lack legitimacy, a more fine-grained conceptualization of nudges seems warranted. The paper offers a categorization of nudges on the basis of their transparency on and the question of whether the intervention aims at the automatic system only or tackles the reflexive system as well. We argue that nudges are legitimate when they allow for autonomous choice and aim at a decision problem which is actually identified as such by the individual herself. This is the case when (i) nudges are transparent, tackle the reflective system, and help the individual dealing with issues of attention and obliviousness (for example warnings), (ii) have an educative function, and (iii) when they respond to issues of self-control, which the individual regards as not fitting into her long-term preferences and her overarching scheme of life.