Menu Expand

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style

Rulf, K. (2025). 'Why U.S. Universities have more influence in the global debate on AI Governance and Regulation and how German Universities can reclaim their seat at the table. A workshop report' In M. Löwisch, T. Würtenberger, & M. Geis & D. Heckmann (Eds.), Künstliche Intelligenz in Forschung, Lehre und Hochschule (1st ed., pp. 129-137)
Rulf, Kirsten. "Why U.S. Universities have more influence in the global debate on AI Governance and Regulation and how German Universities can reclaim their seat at the table. A workshop report". Künstliche Intelligenz in Forschung, Lehre und Hochschule, edited by Manfred Löwisch, Thomas Würtenberger, Max-Emanuel Geis and Dirk Heckmann, Duncker & Humblot, 2025, pp. 129-137.
Rulf, K. (2025): 'Why U.S. Universities have more influence in the global debate on AI Governance and Regulation and how German Universities can reclaim their seat at the table. A workshop report', in Löwisch, M, Würtenberger, T, Geis, M, Heckmann, D (eds.). Künstliche Intelligenz in Forschung, Lehre und Hochschule. Duncker & Humblot, pp. 129-137.

Format

Why U.S. Universities have more influence in the global debate on AI Governance and Regulation and how German Universities can reclaim their seat at the table. A workshop report

Rulf, Kirsten

In: Künstliche Intelligenz in Forschung, Lehre und Hochschule (2025), pp. 129–137

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Pricing

Author Details

Kirsten Rulf

Kirsten Rulf ist Partnerin bei BCG und war bis April 2023 Leiterin des Referats „Grundsatzfragen der Digitalpolitik“ im Bundeskanzleramt. Zuvor lehrte sie „KI und Compliance“ an der Harvard Law School. Zudem ist sie UC Berkeley Tech Policy Fellow.

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Kirsten Rulf: Why U.S. Universities have more influence in the global debate on AI Governance and Regulation and how German Universities can reclaim their seat at the table. A workshop report 129
I. Introduction 129
II. Not learning for school but for life 131
III. Characteristics of the U.S. Professional School 132
IV. Conclusion 136