Menu Expand
  1. Subjects (Books)
  2. Language & Linguistics
  3. Linguistics
  4. Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics
  5. Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen
  6. pp. 247–256

BOOK CHAPTER

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style
Coendet, T. (2024). 'The Legal Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence' In K. Leyhausen-Seibert, A. Menzel, & F. Vogel (Eds.), Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen (1st ed., pp. 247-256)
Coendet, Thomas. "The Legal Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence". Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen, edited by Katja Leyhausen-Seibert, Anna Menzel and Friedemann Vogel, Duncker & Humblot, 2024, pp. 247-256.
Coendet, T. (2024): 'The Legal Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence', in Leyhausen-Seibert, K, Menzel, A, Vogel, F (eds.). Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen. Duncker & Humblot, pp. 247-256.
Format
Download

The Legal Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence

Coendet, Thomas

In: Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen (2024), pp. 247–256

Read now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-59183-1.339317
Language
German
Pages
10

Author Details

Thomas Coendet

Dr. iur. Thomas Coendet, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU), Shanghai, China

References

  1. Aloi, Giovanni/McHugh, Susan (2021): Envisioning Posthumanism. In: Posthumanism in Art and Science: A Reader, edited by Giovanni Aloi and Susan McHugh, 1 – 21. New York: Columbia University Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Armour, John/Parnham, Richard/Sako, Mari (2020): Augmented Lawyering. Working Paper 558/2020. European Corporate Governance Institute – Law Working Paper. ECGI.  Google Scholar
  3. Ashley, Kevin D. (2017): Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  4. Coendet, Thomas (2016): Legal Reasoning: Arguments from Comparison. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 102 (4): 476 – 507.  Google Scholar
  5. Coendet, Thomas (2024): Critical Methods. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, edited by Mathias Siems and Po Jen Yap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 48 – 71.  Google Scholar
  6. Conrad, Jack G./Branting, L. Karl (2018): Introduction to the Special Issue on Legal Text Analytics. Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (2): 99 – 102.  Google Scholar
  7. Deakin, Simon/Markou, Christopher (2020a): From Rule of Law to Legal Singularity. In: Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence, edited by Simon Deakin and Christopher Markou, 1 – 30. Oxford: Hart.  Google Scholar
  8. Deakin, Simon/Markou, Christopher (eds.) (2020b): Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Hart.  Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, John (2012): Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  10. Goertzel, Ben (2014): Artificial General Intelligence: Concept, State of the Art, and Future Prospects. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 5 (1): 1 – 48.  Google Scholar
  11. Gold, Matthew K. (ed.) (2012): Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Gold, Matthew K./Klein, Lauren F. (eds.) (2016): Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.  Google Scholar
  13. Gold, Matthew K./Klein, Lauren F. (eds.) (2019): Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.  Google Scholar
  14. Grove, Jack (2023): The ChatGPT Revolution of Academic Research Has Begun. Times Higher Education (THE), 16 March 2023.  Google Scholar
  15. Gupta, Amarnath/Wang, Alice Z./Lin, Kai/Hong, Haoshen/Sun, Haoran/Liebman, Benjamin L./Stern, Rachel E./Dasgupta, Subhasis/Roberts, Margaret E. (2017): Toward Building a Legal Knowledge-Base of Chinese Judicial Documents for Large-Scale Analytics. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 135 – 44.  Google Scholar
  16. Katz, Daniel Martin/Bommarito II, Michael J./Blackman, Josh (2017): A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLOS ONE, April, 1 – 18.  Google Scholar
  17. Kelsen, Hans (2008): Reine Rechtslehre. Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Edited by Matthias Jestaedt. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.  Google Scholar
  18. Lawrence, John/Reed, Chris (2020): Argument Mining: A Survey. Computational Linguistics 45 (4): 765 – 818.  Google Scholar
  19. Lee, Thomas R./Mouritsen, Stephen C. (2018): Judging Ordinary Meaning. Yale Law Journal 127: 788 – 879.  Google Scholar
  20. Leith, Philip (1991): Legal Expert Systems. In: The Computerised Lawyer: A Guide to the Use of Computers in the Legal Profession, edited by Philip Leith, 181 – 99. London: Springer.  Google Scholar
  21. Leith, Philip (2016): The Rise and Fall of the Legal Expert System. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 30 (3): 94 – 106.  Google Scholar
  22. Livingston, Steven/Risse, Mathias (2019): The Future Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Humans and Human Rights. Ethics & International Affairs 33 (2): 141 – 58.  Google Scholar
  23. Luhmann, Niklas (1993): Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.  Google Scholar
  24. McCarty, L. Thorne (1977): Reflections on Taxman: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. Harvard Law Review 90 (5): 837 – 93.  Google Scholar
  25. Mund, Dorothea (2022): Das Recht auf menschliche Entscheidung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.  Google Scholar
  26. Searle, John R. (1980): Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417 – 24.  Google Scholar
  27. Stajic, Jelena/Stone, Richard/Chin, Gilbert/Wible, Brad (2015): Rise of the Machines. Science 349 (6245): 248 – 49.  Google Scholar
  28. Susskind, Richard E. (1986): Expert Systems in Law: A Jurisprudential Approach to Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. The Modern Law Review 49 (2): 168 – 94.  Google Scholar
  29. Susskind, Richard E. (2019): Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  30. The Law Society of England and Wales (2019): Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System.  Google Scholar
  31. Tsujii, Junichi (2021): Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 1 – 41.  Google Scholar
  32. Vermeule, Adrian (2006): Judging Under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Vogel, Friedemann/Hamann, Hanjo/Gauer, Isabelle (2018): Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics: Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies. Law & Social Inquiry 43 (4): 1340 – 63.  Google Scholar
  34. Vogel, Friedemann/Pötters, Stephan/Christensen, Ralph (2015): Richterrecht der Arbeit – empirisch untersucht: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen computergestützter Textanalyse am Beispiel des Arbeitnehmerbegriffs. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar
  35. Wang, Pei (2019): On Defining Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 10 (2): 1 – 37.  Google Scholar
  36. Weizenbaum, Joseph (1976): Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. San Francisco: Freeman.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Thomas Coendet: The Legal Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence 247
I. Law and the Challenge of Artificial Intelligence 247
II. AI and Law: A Glance at the Bright Side 248
III. AI and Law: A Glance at the Dark Side 249
IV. Postscript: A Field Test on ChatGPT 252
Literature 254

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.