Menu Expand
  1. Subjects (Books)
  2. Language & Linguistics
  3. Linguistics
  4. Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics
  5. Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen
  6. pp. 87–100

BOOK CHAPTER

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style
Zilberszac, N. (2024). 'Legal Objectivity' In K. Leyhausen-Seibert, A. Menzel, & F. Vogel (Eds.), Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen (1st ed., pp. 87-100)
Zilberszac, Nicole. "Legal Objectivity: Towards a material and embodied approach". Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen, edited by Katja Leyhausen-Seibert, Anna Menzel and Friedemann Vogel, Duncker & Humblot, 2024, pp. 87-100.
Zilberszac, N. (2024): 'Legal Objectivity', in Leyhausen-Seibert, K, Menzel, A, Vogel, F (eds.). Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen. Duncker & Humblot, pp. 87-100.
Format
Download

Legal Objectivity

Towards a material and embodied approach

Zilberszac, Nicole

In: Wissen in Recht und Sprache – Viele Stimmen, vage Grenzen (2024), pp. 87–100

Read now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-59183-1.339321
Language
German
Pages
14

Author Details

Nicole Zilberszac

References

  1. Alloa, Emmanuel (2012): Leiblichkeit: Geschichte und Aktualität eines Konzepts. Stuttgart: Utb.  Google Scholar
  2. Antony, Louise (2011): Embodiment and Epistemology, in: P. Moser (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 315 – 353.  Google Scholar
  3. Aquin, Thomas von (1996): Naturrecht und Naturgesetz, in: Galen/Ockenfels, Sammlung Politea Bd. 34. Berlin: De Gruyter.  Google Scholar
  4. Barad, Karen (2007): Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  5. Benfornado, Adam (2010): Frames of Injustice: The Bias We Overlook, in: Indiana Law Journal (2010), pp. 1334 – 1378.  Google Scholar
  6. Benfornado, Adam (2010): The Body of the Mind: Embodied Cognition, Law, and Justice, in: St. Louis University Law Journal, pp. 3 – 31.  Google Scholar
  7. Bidwell-Steiner, Maren (2017): Das Grenzwesen Mensch. Vormoderne Naturphilosophie und Literatur im Dialog mit Postmoderner Gendertheorie. Berlin: DeGruyter.  Google Scholar
  8. Böllinger, Lorenz (2012): Die unbewusste Dynamik richterlichen Entscheidens. Ansätze zu einer Theorie strategischen Handelns im Bereich der Rechtsfindung, in: Betrifft JUSTIZ, pp. 224 – 231.  Google Scholar
  9. Bordo, Susan (1986): The Cartesian Masculinization of Thought, in: Signs 11 (3), pp. 439 – 456.  Google Scholar
  10. Buchholz, Michel B. (2014): Embodiment, in: Forum der Psychoanalyse, 30 (2), pp. 109 – 118.  Google Scholar
  11. Code, Lorraine (1993): Taking Subjectivity into Account, in: Alcoff/Potter, Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge, pp. 15 – 49.  Google Scholar
  12. Danzinger, Shai/Levav, Jonathan/Avnaim-Pesso, Liora (2011): Extraneous factors in judicial decisions, in: PNAS 108 (17), pp. 6889 – 6892.  Google Scholar
  13. Descartes, René (2014 (1641): Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Philosophie.https://andersseitig.de/.  Google Scholar
  14. Engelmann, Andreas (2019): Recht als Kultur – Rechtswissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft, in: Rechtsphilosophie Band 5. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 129 – 141;  Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, William/Horwitz, Morton J./Reed, Thomas A. (1993): American Legal Realism. Band 3. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Foljanty, Lena (2013): Recht oder Gesetz: juristische Identität und Autorität in den Naturrechtsdebatten der Nachkriegszeit. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.  Google Scholar
  17. Fraser, Nancy, (1990): Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, in: Social Text, pp. 56 – 80.  Google Scholar
  18. Gallagher, Shaun/Zahavi, Dan (2008): The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  19. Goudriaan, Aza (2006): Descartes, Cartesianism, and Early Modern Theology, in: Lehner, Muller, Roeber, The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, 1600 – 1800. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 533 – 550.  Google Scholar
  20. Greenawalt, Kent (1992): Law and Objectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Grosz, Elizabeth (1993): Bodies and Knowledges: Feminism and the Crisis of Reason, in: Alcoff/Potter, Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge, pp.187 – 215.  Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, Jürgen (1981): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Berlin: Suhrkamp.  Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, Jürgen (1987): Wie ist Legitimität durch Legalität möglich? In: Kritische Justiz, pp. 1 – 16.  Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, Donna (1988): Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, in: Feminist Studies, pp. 575 – 599.  Google Scholar
  25. Haraway, Donna (2016): Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Hart, H. L. A. (1961): The Concept of Law. London: Clarendon Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Haslanger, Sally (2000): Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be? In: NOÛS, pp. 31 – 55.  Google Scholar
  28. Jan, Slaby (2016): Mind Invasion: Situated Affectivity and the Corporate Life Hack. Frontiers in Psychology, pp. 266 – 270.  Google Scholar
  29. Jelić, Andrea/Tieri, Gaetano/De Matteis, Federico/Babiloni, Fabio/Vecchiato, Giovanni (2016): The Enactive Approach to Architectural Experience: A Neurophysiological Perspective on Embodiment, Motivation, and Affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, pp. 481 – 488.  Google Scholar
  30. Kahan, Dan/Braman, Donald (2006): Cultural Cognition and Public Policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, pp. 147 – 170.  Google Scholar
  31. Kant, Immanuel (2014/1785): Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten, in: Wilhelm Weischedel (ed.), Werkausgabe Band VII, pp. 41 – 51.  Google Scholar
  32. Kant, Immanuel (2018/1797): Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Metaphysik der Sitten, Erster Teil. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.  Google Scholar
  33. Kelsen, Hans (1992/1960²): Reine Rechtslehre. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.  Google Scholar
  34. Kennedy, Duncan (1986): Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology, Journal of Legal Education, pp. 518 – 563.  Google Scholar
  35. Kiverstein, Julian (2018): Extended Cognition, in: Albert Newen, Leon De Bruin, and Shaun Gallagher, The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 19 – 41.  Google Scholar
  36. Klappstein, Verena (2005): Demokratische Legitimation und Grenzen der Verlagerung von Entscheidungen auf den Rechtsanwender, in: Carsten Bäcker, Stefan Baufeld, Objektivität und Flexibilität im Recht: Tagungen des Jungen Forums Rechtsphilosophie (JFR), in: Archiv für Rechts – und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft, pp. 111 – 131.  Google Scholar
  37. Leiter, Brian (2005): American Legal Realism, in: Martin Golding, William A. Edmundson, The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Hoboken: Wiley, pp. 50 – 66.  Google Scholar
  38. MacKinnon, Catherine (1982): Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: An Agenda for Theory, in: Signs 7‍(3), pp. 515 – 544.  Google Scholar
  39. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1974): Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. Berlin: De Gruyter.  Google Scholar
  40. Morton, Timothy (2013): Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.  Google Scholar
  41. Nagel, Thomas (1986): Der Blick von nirgendwo. Berlin: Suhrkamp.  Google Scholar
  42. Newen, Albert/Bruin, Leon De/Gallagher, Shaun (2018): 4E Cognition: Historical Roots, Key Concepts and Central Issues, in: A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3 – 19.  Google Scholar
  43. Newen, Albert/Bruin, Leon De/Gallagher, Shaun (2018): The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  44. Niemi, Matti Ilmari (2016): What is the foundation of objectivity in the Field of Law, in: André Ferreira Leite de Paula, Andrés Santacoloma Santacoloma, Gonzalo Villa Rosas, Truth and Objectivity in Law and Morals II 2015, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft, pp. 15 – 37.  Google Scholar
  45. Pavoni, Andrea/Mandic, Danilo/Nirta, Caterina/Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (2018): The Westminster Law and the Senses Series, See. The Westminster Law and the Senses Series, Taste. London: Westminster University Press.  Google Scholar
  46. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas (2013): Atmospheres of Law: Senses, affects, lawscapes. Emotion, Space and Society, 6, pp. 35 – 44.  Google Scholar
  47. Plessner, Helmuth (1941): Lachen und Weinen. Eine Untersuchung nach den Grenzen menschlichen Verhaltens. Leiden: Brill.  Google Scholar
  48. Rawls, John (1971): A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.  Google Scholar
  49. Reiss, Julian/Sprenger, Jan (2017): Scientific Objectivity, in: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition).https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity/.  Google Scholar
  50. Ricca, Marco (2020): Otherness, Elsewhere, and the ‘Ecology’ of Law’s Implications: The Semiotic Oceans Surrounding Legal Signification and its Discriminatory Exteriority/Objectivity. International Journal of Legal Discourse, pp. 185 – 237.  Google Scholar
  51. Shapiro, Lawrence (2014): The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  52. Shotwell, Alexis (2019): Forms of knowing and epistemic resources, in: Ian James Kidd, José Medina, Gaile Pohlhaus. The Routledge Handbook of epistemic justice. London: Routledge, pp. 79 – 89.  Google Scholar
  53. Somek, Alexander (2017): The legal relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  54. Sullivan, Michael (2019): Epistemic Justice and the law, in: Ian James Kidd, José Medina, Gaile Pohlhaus. The Routledge Handbook of epistemic justice. London: Routledge, pp. 293 – 303.  Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, Evan (2010): Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard: University Press.  Google Scholar
  56. Viola, Francesco (2016): Natural Law Theories in the Twentieth Century, in Enrico Pattaro, Corrado Reversi, Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World, Vol. 12. Berlin, Hamburg; Springer, pp. 1065 – 1153.  Google Scholar
  57. Waldenfels, Bernhard (2000): Das leibliche Selbst. Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des Leibes. Berlin: Suhrkamp.  Google Scholar
  58. Zilberszac, Nicole (2018): Objektivität in den Rechtswissenschaften, Juridikum, pp. 38 – 48.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Legal Objectivity 87
Towards a material and embodied approach 87
I. Introduction 87
II. Deficits of different accounts of legal objectivity 90
III. Replace, abandon or reconceptualize 93
IV. Knowing the law – 4E Cognition as a framework for legal cognitive processes 94
V. Being the law: In what way can we think about the law as an object? 96
VI. Towards a material and embodied approach to legal objectivity 97
Literature 97

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.