German Yearbook of International Law / Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht
BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Format
German Yearbook of International Law / Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht
Vol. 53 (2010)
Editors: Giegerich, Thomas | Proelß, Alexander
German Yearbook of International Law / Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht, Vol. 53
(2011)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
Abstract
The German Yearbook of International Law, founded as the Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht, provides an annual report on new developments in international law and is edited by the Walther Schücking Institute for International Law at the University of Kiel. Since its inception in 1948, the Yearbook has endeavored to make a significant academic contribution to the ongoing development of international law. Over many decades the Yearbook has moved beyond its origins as a forum for German scholars to publish their research and has become a highly-regarded international forum for innovative scholarship in international law. In 1976, the Yearbook adopted its current title and began to publish contributions written in English in order to reach the largest possible international audience. This editorial decision has enabled the Yearbook to successfully overcome traditional language barriers and inform an international readership about current research in German academic institutions and, at the same time, to present international viewpoints to its German audience. Fully aware of the paramount importance of international practice, the Yearbook publishes contributions from active practitioners of international law on a regular basis. The Yearbook also includes critical comments on German state practice relating to international and EU law, as well as international reactions to that practice.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 5 | ||
FORUM: PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL LAW FROM CHINA | 9 | ||
BING BING JIA: A Synthesis of the Notion of Sovereignty and the Ideal of the Rule of Law: Reflections on the Contemporary Chinese Approach to International Law | 11 | ||
I. Introduction | 11 | ||
II. Sovereignty | 14 | ||
A. The Concept of Sovereignty: A Brief Retrospect | 14 | ||
B. The Relevance of the Status of a Third World Country | 18 | ||
C. The Doctrine of Sovereignty as Part of the Contemporary Legal Order | 21 | ||
III. The Rule of Law | 23 | ||
A. The Current International Community | 23 | ||
B. The Nature of Contemporary International Law: A Tentative View | 26 | ||
C. The International Rule of Law | 30 | ||
1. The UN on the International Rule of Law | 32 | ||
2. China on the International Rule of Law | 34 | ||
IV. Contemporary Chinese Practice: A Synthesis of the Notion of Sovereignty and Respect for the Rule of Law | 36 | ||
A. China’s Approach to International Treaties | 37 | ||
1. Position in the Early Days | 38 | ||
2. Adherence to Treaties in the Negotiation of Which China has Participated | 39 | ||
3. The Law on the Procedures for the Conclusion of Treaties | 40 | ||
4. The Effect of Treaties as Part of Chinese Law | 41 | ||
B. China’s Approach to Customary Law | 43 | ||
C. China’s Approach to Certain Important Questions Incidental to its Notion of Sovereignty | 45 | ||
1. Sovereignty and Remedial Self-Determination | 45 | ||
2. Sovereignty and State Immunity: The 2004 Convention as a Watershed? | 50 | ||
3. Sovereignty and Jurisdiction: Need for a Positive Rule | 53 | ||
V. Conclusions | 59 | ||
FOCUS: CLIMATE CHANGE AND NEW CHALLENGES FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW | 63 | ||
ALEXANDER PROELSS: International Environmental Law and the Challenge of Climate Change | 65 | ||
I. The Significance of the Precautionary Principle | 71 | ||
II. Potential Responses Using International Environmental Law | 76 | ||
A. Principles as Obligations to Optimize | 77 | ||
B. Transferability to International Law | 78 | ||
III. Legal Consequences of a Comprehensive, Multi-Functional Understanding of Precaution | 81 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 86 | ||
MALGOSIA FITZMAURICE: Responsibility and Climate Change | 89 | ||
I. Introduction | 89 | ||
II. General Observations on the Structure of the Norm in International Law | 93 | ||
A. The Structure of Norms of International Environmental Law: The Issue of Collective Interest | 97 | ||
B. Conclusions | 101 | ||
III. Introductory Observations: Primary Rules of International Environmental Law | 101 | ||
A. Climate Change: Primary Rules | 103 | ||
1. Climate Change as a “Common Concern of Mankind” | 103 | ||
2. Short Introduction to the Climate Change Legal Regime | 105 | ||
a) The UNFCCC Treaty Regime | 105 | ||
b) The Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC | 107 | ||
3. “Soft law” Obligations | 108 | ||
a) The Bali Road Map | 108 | ||
b) The Copenhagen Accord | 108 | ||
c) Qualified Economy-Wide Emissions Targets of Annex I Parties and the Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions of Non-Annex I Parties | 110 | ||
B. Conclusions | 111 | ||
IV. Climate Change and Customary International Law on State Responsibility | 112 | ||
A. Climate Change and State Responsibility: General Observation | 112 | ||
B. General Principles of Responsibility for Wrongful Acts | 113 | ||
C. The Wrongful Act and its Attribution | 114 | ||
D. The “No Significant Harm” Rule | 116 | ||
E. The Obligation of Due Diligence | 119 | ||
1. Due Diligence and Climate Change Challenges | 121 | ||
F. Conclusions | 128 | ||
V. Climate Change as a Self-Contained Regime | 130 | ||
A. An Outline of the Problem | 130 | ||
B. Climate Change as a Self-Contained Regime | 133 | ||
VI. Soft Law Obligations and Climate Change | 136 | ||
VII. General Conclusions | 137 | ||
PHILIPP AERNI, BERTRAM BOIE, THOMAS COTTIER, KATERYNA HOLZER, DANNIE JOST, BARIS KARAPINAR, SOFYA MATTEOTTI, OLGA NARTOVA, TETYANA PAYOSOVA, LUCA RUBINI, ANIRUDH SHINGAL, FITZGERALD TEMMERMAN, ELENA XOPLAKI, SADEQ Z.BIGDELI: Climate Change and International Law: Exploring the Linkages Between Human Rights, Environment, Trade and Investment | 139 | ||
I. Introduction | 140 | ||
II. Environmental Law: Principles, UNFCCC and Kyoto II | 141 | ||
A. Relevance of the Precautionary Principle | 142 | ||
B. Relevance of the Polluter Pays Principle | 146 | ||
C. The Current International Climate Policy Framework | 148 | ||
D. Common but Differentiated Responsibility | 150 | ||
III. The Human Rights Dimension | 152 | ||
A. Social and Economic Rights | 152 | ||
B. Civil and Political Rights | 158 | ||
IV. The Impact of Trade Regulation | 159 | ||
A. Defensive Functions of WTO Law | 160 | ||
1. Border Adjustment Measures | 160 | ||
2. Carbon Tariffs | 164 | ||
3. Non-Tariff Measures | 166 | ||
4. Consumer Taxes | 167 | ||
B. Proactive Functions of WTO Law | 168 | ||
1. Framework Energy Agreement | 169 | ||
a) Liberalization of Trade in Environmental Goods and Services | 169 | ||
b) Reinforcing Energy Services Commitments and Energy Efficiency | 170 | ||
c) Framework Conditions for Renewable Energies | 171 | ||
d) Review of Subsidies Disciplines | 172 | ||
e) Transit Rights | 176 | ||
f) Energy Production Controls: OPEC Clause | 177 | ||
g) Technology Transfer, CDM and Intellectual Property Rights | 178 | ||
2. Aid for Trade and the Role of Biotechnology | 181 | ||
V. Investment Protection | 183 | ||
VI. Conclusions | 186 | ||
CLIVE SCHOFIELD: Rising Waters, Shrinking States: The Potential Impacts of Sea Level Rise on Claims to Maritime Jurisdiction | 189 | ||
I. Introduction | 189 | ||
II. Global Sea Level Rise | 191 | ||
A. Climate Change and the Oceans | 191 | ||
B. Rising Waters | 193 | ||
C. Trying to Detect a Clear Message Through the Static | 196 | ||
III. Now You See It …? | 200 | ||
A. The Threats Posed by Sea Level Rise | 200 | ||
B. Implications for Islands | 201 | ||
C. Threats to Maritime Jurisdiction | 203 | ||
D. Threats to the Continued Existence of Small Island States | 204 | ||
E. Alternative Explanations | 205 | ||
IV. Parting the Land from the Sea | 207 | ||
A. Baselines | 207 | ||
B. Invisible Coasts | 208 | ||
C. Dynamic Coasts, Ambulatory Baselines and Shifting Limits | 210 | ||
D. Uneven Impacts | 212 | ||
V. Options to Counter the Threat of Sea Level Rise to Maritime Claims | 214 | ||
A. Planned Retreat and Relocation | 214 | ||
B. Coastal Protection | 215 | ||
C. Securing the Starting Line | 219 | ||
1. Choice of Chart | 220 | ||
2. Applying Straight Baselines | 222 | ||
3. Declared Baselines | 224 | ||
D. Fixed Limits | 224 | ||
E. Options in the Face of Total Inundation of Land Territory | 226 | ||
VI. Conclusion – The Need for a Fresh Approach? | 228 | ||
JANE MCADAM AND BEN SAUL: Displacement with Dignity: International Law and Policy Responses to Climate Change Migration and Security in Bangladesh | 233 | ||
I. Introduction | 234 | ||
II. The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Movement in Bangladesh | 237 | ||
III. The Likely Nature of Movement | 241 | ||
A. Internal Displacement | 241 | ||
B. Cross-Border Migration | 243 | ||
IV. Security Risks of Climate Change-Related Movement in Bangladesh | 248 | ||
A. Social Conflict over Scarce Resources | 249 | ||
B. Risks of Radicalization and Terrorism Within Bangladesh | 253 | ||
C. Transnational Security Risks of Bangladeshi Migration | 257 | ||
D. Ethnic Insurgencies | 260 | ||
E. Religious Terrorism | 262 | ||
F. Border Securitization | 263 | ||
V. Options for Law and Policy Reform | 265 | ||
A. Strengthen In-Country Adaptation | 267 | ||
B. Implement International Standards on Internal Displacement | 269 | ||
1. Pre-Displacement Phase | 271 | ||
2. During Displacement | 271 | ||
3. Resettlement or Relocation | 273 | ||
C. Strengthening Protection Under International Treaties | 278 | ||
D. Temporary Protection Responses | 280 | ||
E. Encourage Global Labor Mobility and Lawful Migration Pathways | 282 | ||
VI. Conclusion | 285 | ||
MICHAEL BOWMAN: Conserving Biological Diversity in an Era of Climate Change: Local Implementation of International Wildlife Treaties | 289 | ||
I. Introduction | 289 | ||
II. The Convention on Biodiversity | 293 | ||
A. General Provisions | 293 | ||
B. Climate Change | 295 | ||
III. The Ramsar Wetlands Convention | 298 | ||
A. General Provisions | 299 | ||
B. Climate Change | 302 | ||
IV. The Bonn Convention on Migratory Species | 305 | ||
A. General Provisions | 306 | ||
B. Climate Change | 308 | ||
V. The Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats | 311 | ||
A. General Provisions | 312 | ||
B. Climate Change | 316 | ||
VI. Local Implementation in the UK | 317 | ||
A. Selecting a Case Study | 318 | ||
B. Legal and Administrative Context | 322 | ||
C. Nature Conservation in Practice | 324 | ||
1. The Peak District National Park | 324 | ||
2. The City of Derby | 328 | ||
3. Lowland Derbyshire | 332 | ||
VII. Conclusions | 338 | ||
JOYEETA GUPTA: Climate Change: A GAP Analysis Based on Third World Approaches to International Law | 341 | ||
I. Introduction | 342 | ||
II. Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) | 346 | ||
A. Introduction | 346 | ||
B. Perspectives of the TWAIL School of Thought | 347 | ||
C. Inferences | 350 | ||
III. The Climate Change Regime: A History | 351 | ||
IV. Copenhagen and its Results | 357 | ||
A. The Key Results | 358 | ||
B. The Targets | 360 | ||
C. The Finances | 363 | ||
D. Inferences: What Next? | 364 | ||
V. Analysis | 364 | ||
VI. Conclusions | 368 | ||
WYBE TH. DOUMA: Legal Aspects of the European Union’s Biofuels Policy: Protection or Protectionism? | 371 | ||
I. Introduction | 371 | ||
II. Biofuels: Cure or Curse? | 374 | ||
III. The Former EU Rules on Transport Biofuel and Their Practical Impacts | 378 | ||
IV. The Present EU Rules on Transport Biofuels | 380 | ||
A. The Road Towards the Present Rules | 380 | ||
B. The Renewable Energy Directive and the Fuel Quality Directive | 383 | ||
1. General | 383 | ||
2. Indirect Land Use Change | 385 | ||
3. Social Impacts | 387 | ||
4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Savings | 388 | ||
C. Land-Use Requirements | 391 | ||
D. Verification of Compliance with Sustainability Criteria | 393 | ||
V. WTO Consistency of EU Sustainability Criteria | 394 | ||
A. Introduction | 394 | ||
B. Article III GATT 1994, National Treatment | 395 | ||
1. Purpose and Scope of the Provision | 395 | ||
2. Regulatory Measure Affecting Internal Sale | 398 | ||
3. Less Favorable Treatment | 398 | ||
4. “Like” Products | 400 | ||
C. Article XI: Quantitative Restrictions | 405 | ||
D. The Article XX Exception | 407 | ||
1. General | 407 | ||
2. Article XX(g): Natural Resources | 409 | ||
3. Article XX(b): Protection of Human, Animal or Plant Life and Health | 412 | ||
4. Chapeau of Article XX | 418 | ||
GENERAL ARTICLES | 421 | ||
THOMAS GIEGERICH, ALEXANDER PROELSS: Foreword from the Editors | 423 | ||
GÜNTHER HANDL: In Re South African Apartheid Litigation and Beyond: Corporate Liability for Aiding and Abetting Under the Alien Tort Statute | 425 | ||
I. Introduction | 425 | ||
II. Corporate Liability Under the ATS | 431 | ||
III. Corporate Aiding and Abetting Liability Under the ATS | 438 | ||
IV. Aiding and Abetting Liability: The Basic Choice-of-Law Issue | 441 | ||
V. Specific Aiding and Abetting Standards Under Customary International Law | 446 | ||
A. The Actus Reus of Aiding and Abetting | 447 | ||
B. The Applicable Mens Rea Standard | 451 | ||
C. The Issue of Vicarious Liability | 458 | ||
VI. Outlook and Conclusions | 460 | ||
KAI AMBOS: The Crime of Aggression After Kampala | 463 | ||
I. Preliminary Remarks | 464 | ||
II. The Kampala Compromise | 466 | ||
A. The Definition | 467 | ||
B. The Exercise of Jurisdiction | 471 | ||
1. The Starting Point | 471 | ||
2. The Negotiations | 473 | ||
3. The Final Compromise | 475 | ||
III. Critical Analysis | 478 | ||
A. Preliminary Clarifications | 478 | ||
B. The Definition | 482 | ||
1. The Dual Nature of the Crime of Aggression and the Threshold Clause | 482 | ||
2. The Reference to Resolution 3314 | 486 | ||
3. The Special Offense Character of the Crime and the Leadership Clause | 489 | ||
4. The Conduct Verbs and the Criminalization of Preparatory Acts | 493 | ||
5. The Mental Element | 497 | ||
C. The Exercise of Jurisdiction | 498 | ||
1. The Trigger Procedures and the Role of the Security Council | 498 | ||
2. Conditions for the Exercise of Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Limitations (Article 15bis (4) and (5)) | 501 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 508 | ||
KERSTIN ODENDAHL: The Scope of Application of the Principle of Territorial Integrity | 511 | ||
I. Introduction: The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo | 511 | ||
II. The Principle of Territorial Integrity in International Documents | 514 | ||
A. The Birth of a New International Concept | 514 | ||
B. The Establishment of a New Legal Principle in UN Documents | 516 | ||
1. The Original Principle: Article 2 (4) UN Charter and its Reaffirmation by UN Documents | 516 | ||
2. UN Documents Enlarging the Principle | 518 | ||
3. UN Documents Mentioning the Principle in a General Manner | 521 | ||
C. The Adoption of the Principle by Regional Documents | 521 | ||
1. Regional Documents Referring to the Original Principle | 522 | ||
2. Regional Documents Referring to the Enlarged Principle | 523 | ||
3. Regional Documents Mentioning the Principle in a General Manner | 524 | ||
D. Recognition as a Principle of Customary International Law | 526 | ||
III. External Scope of Application of the Principle of Territorial Integrity | 527 | ||
IV. Internal Scope of Application of the Principle of Territorial Integrity? | 528 | ||
A. Security Council Resolutions Condemning Secessionist Movements and/or Declarations of Independence | 530 | ||
B. General Assembly Resolutions Condemning Secessionist Movements and/or Declarations of Independence | 533 | ||
C. Territorial Integrity of States as a General and Absolute Principle | 534 | ||
D. The “Safeguard Clause:” Limiting the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination in Favor of Territorial Integrity | 536 | ||
V. Conclusion | 539 | ||
CHARLES RIZIKI MAJINGE: Southern Sudan and the Struggle for Self-Determination in Contemporary Africa: Examining its Basis Under International Law | 541 | ||
I. Introduction | 541 | ||
II. Southern Sudan within Sudan | 545 | ||
III. The CPA and the Constitutional Developments in Sudan | 551 | ||
IV. The Concept of Self-Determination in International Law | 554 | ||
V. The Right to Self-Determination in Contemporary Africa | 559 | ||
A. Biafra | 561 | ||
B. Eritrea | 562 | ||
C. Western Sahara | 563 | ||
VI. The Basis for Southern Sudan’s Claim to the Right to Self-Determination | 568 | ||
VII. Conclusion | 576 | ||
ANASTASIOS GOURGOURINIS: Lex Specialis in WTO and Investment Protection Law | 579 | ||
I. Introduction | 579 | ||
II. The Dual Typology of Lex Specialis: The Principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali and the Lex Specialis/Generalis Qualification | 581 | ||
A. The Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Principle as Denoting Exclusionar Application of Conflicting International Legal Norms | 585 | ||
B. The Case of Lex Specialis/Generalis Qualification as Denoting Cumulative Application of Non-Conflicting Norms | 593 | ||
C. Interim Conclusions: Normative Conflict in the Operative Context of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali and Article 31 (3)(c) VCLT | 599 | ||
III. An Operative Sketch for Lex Specialis | 604 | ||
A. The Proper Operation of Lex Specialis Entails a “Norm-by-Norm” Juxtaposition | 604 | ||
B. The Proper Operation of Lex Specialis Requires a High Degree of Rationae Materiae Sameness Shared by the Juxtaposed Norms | 610 | ||
C. The Relationship Between Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali and Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori | 618 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 621 | ||
ANNE PETERS: Extraterritorial Naturalizations: Between the Human Right to Nationality, State Sovereignty and Fair Principles of Jurisdiction | 623 | ||
I. Introduction | 624 | ||
II. Basic Concepts | 625 | ||
A. Nationality | 625 | ||
B. Original and Derivative Acquisition of Nationality | 627 | ||
III. The Duality of Nationality: Domestic Affairs Within International Legal Limits | 628 | ||
IV. The Practice of Extraterritorial Naturalization | 632 | ||
A. The Russian “Passportization” Policy in South Ossetia and Abkhazia Since 2002 | 634 | ||
1. International Legal Background | 635 | ||
2. Georgian Nationality of Residents of South Osssetia and Abkhazia | 638 | ||
3. Inopposability of Abkhazian and South Ossetian “Nationality” | 640 | ||
4. Naturalization of Georgian Citizens Residing in Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Russia | 641 | ||
B. Russian “Passportization” Policy in Transnistria (Moldova) | 644 | ||
C. Hungarian Extraterritorial Nationality | 645 | ||
D. The Romanian Policy of Extraterritorial Restitution of Nationality | 647 | ||
E. Extraterritorial German Nationality and “Status” Between 1949 and 1990 | 649 | ||
1. The One and Single German Nationality Beyond the Territorial Scope of the Basic Law | 651 | ||
2. Status-Germans Residing in the Former Eastern Territories of Germany | 653 | ||
F. Cypriot Nationality of the Inhabitants of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus | 656 | ||
V. Principles Governing Extraterritorial Naturalizations | 657 | ||
A. The Interests at Stake | 657 | ||
B. Powers of the Naturalizing State | 658 | ||
C. Rights of the Concerned Individuals | 658 | ||
1. The Right to Change One’s Nationality Through Naturalization | 659 | ||
a) A Human Right to Nationality? | 659 | ||
b) The Rights to Acquire, to Retain, and to Change One’s Nationality | 661 | ||
c) The Right to Change as a Prohibition of an Arbitrary Refusal to Release a National | 662 | ||
2. The Right Not to be Discriminated Against in the Context of Naturalization | 664 | ||
3. The Right Not to be Naturalized Against One’s Will | 666 | ||
a) Legal Basis of the Consent Requirement | 666 | ||
b) Vitiation of the Individual’s Consent | 668 | ||
4. Limits to the Individual Choice of Nationality | 668 | ||
D. Interests of the Former Patron State | 669 | ||
1. Preserving Statehood | 669 | ||
2. Jurisdiction over Persons | 671 | ||
3. Territorial Sovereignty | 672 | ||
E. Principles Serving Global Public Interests | 673 | ||
1. Good Neighborliness | 674 | ||
2. Repartition of Jurisdiction | 674 | ||
3. The Prohibition of an Abuse of Rights | 675 | ||
VI. Striking the Balance: International Legal Limits on Naturalizations | 677 | ||
A. The Prohibition of an Arbitrary Refusal to Release One’s Nationals | 678 | ||
B. The Requirement of a Factual Connection Between Applicants and the Naturalizing State | 680 | ||
1. Rationales | 681 | ||
2. Manifestation of the General Principle of Effectiveness | 682 | ||
3. Intensity: No “Genuine” Link Requirement | 684 | ||
a) Nottebohm and the Ensuing Controversy | 684 | ||
b) Appropriate Connections Suffice | 686 | ||
C. No per se Illegality of Individual Extraterritorial Naturalizations | 689 | ||
1. The Traditional Requirement of Residence | 689 | ||
2. Abandonment of the Residence Requirement for Individual Naturalizations | 690 | ||
D. Collective Naturalizations | 691 | ||
1. The Requirement of an Individual Right of Refusal | 692 | ||
2. The Requirement of Residence for Collective Naturalizations | 693 | ||
3. Collective Naturalization in the Context of State Succession | 694 | ||
a) No “Automatic” Collective Change of Nationality | 695 | ||
b) No Customary Right of Option | 696 | ||
4. De facto Collective Naturalizations | 698 | ||
VII. Application of the Principles to the Cases | 700 | ||
A. The Russian “Passportization” Policy in South Ossetia and Abkhazia May Result in Exorbitant Naturalizations | 700 | ||
1. Overstepping the Limits of the Individual Right to Change One’s Nationality | 700 | ||
2. Doubtful Voluntariness | 700 | ||
3. Lacking Factual Connection | 702 | ||
4. De facto Collective Naturalization | 704 | ||
5. Abuse of Rights | 705 | ||
B. Germany, Cyprus, Hungary, and Romania | 705 | ||
VIII. Consequences of Exorbitant Naturalizations Under International Law | 709 | ||
A. Illegality and Non-Opposability | 709 | ||
B. Non-Opposability Through Non-Recognition | 712 | ||
1. Non-Recognition by International Bodies and by Any Other State | 712 | ||
2. Non-Recognition from a Choice of Law Perspective | 715 | ||
3. Non-Recognition Only if Serious Doubts | 716 | ||
a) The General Presumption of Lawfulness of a Naturalization | 716 | ||
b) No Such Presumption for Extraterritorial Naturalizations | 718 | ||
4. Possible Preclusion of Wrongfulness or Waiver | 718 | ||
C. Consequences of Exorbitant Naturalizations for the Former Nationality | 719 | ||
D. Illegality of Extraterritorial Governmental Acts Related to Naturalizations | 722 | ||
IX. Conclusions | 723 | ||
PIETRO PUSTORINO: Failed States and International Law: The Impact of UN Practice on Somalia in Respect of Fundamental Rules of International Law | 727 | ||
I. The Legal Definition of Failed States | 727 | ||
II. The Principle of Effectiveness and Failed States | 731 | ||
III. The Application of the Principles of Prohibition on the Use of Force and Self-Determination of Peoples to Failed States | 733 | ||
IV. The General Objectives of the UN in Regard to Somalia | 734 | ||
V. An Overview of UN Practice on Somalia | 736 | ||
A. The Practice of the General Assembly and Other UN Organs on Somalia | 736 | ||
B. The Security Council’s Practice on Somalia: The Problem of the Consent to the Exercise of International Subsidiary Functions in the Failed States | 739 | ||
C. The Specific Content of the Sovereign Subsidiary Functions Authorized by the Security Council in Somalia | 741 | ||
VI. Relevance of the UN Practice on Somalia for the Progressive Importance of Human Rights and for the Role of People in International Law | 746 | ||
VII. Effects of UN Practice on Somalia with Regard to the Principle of Effectiveness and the Principle of Territorial Integrity | 748 | ||
VIII. The Issue of the International Responsibility of Failed States and the Applicability of Norms on Succession of States | 749 | ||
IX. Conclusions | 751 | ||
PATRICK KROKER: Transitional Justice Policy in Practice: Victim Participation in the Khmer Rouge Tribunal | 753 | ||
I. Introduction | 753 | ||
A. Victims’ Interests in International Criminal Justice | 755 | ||
B. The Cambodian Transitional Justice Context | 758 | ||
II. The Genesis and Development of Victim Participation at the ECCC | 763 | ||
A. The Negotiations Between Cambodia and the UN | 763 | ||
B. Determining the Procedural Law – the Internal Rules | 764 | ||
C. Managing Victim Participation | 767 | ||
D. Early Stages of Victim Participation: From Initial Enthusiasm to First Restrictions | 767 | ||
E. Civil Parties in the First Trial Before the ECCC | 771 | ||
F. The Big Shift: The Fifth Amendment of the Internal Rules | 774 | ||
G. Victim Participation and the Limited Scope of Investigations: the Case of the Khmer Krom | 777 | ||
H. Victims and the First Verdict of the ECCC | 780 | ||
III. Conclusions | 784 | ||
A. Limitations of Criminal Trials | 784 | ||
B. Shortcomings and Recommendations | 786 | ||
1. Recognizing and Communicating Limitations | 786 | ||
2. Provide Adequate Funding for Victim Participation | 787 | ||
3. Management of Victim Participation | 788 | ||
4. Establishing a System of Representation | 789 | ||
5. Cooperation with Civil Society | 790 | ||
KARIN OELLERS-FRAHM: Problematic Question or Problematic Answer? Observations on the International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion Concerning Kosovo’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence | 793 | ||
I. Introduction | 793 | ||
II. The Factual Background to the Request | 794 | ||
III. The Adoption of GA Resolution 63/3 of 8 September 2008 | 797 | ||
IV. The Opinion of the Court | 799 | ||
A. Procedural Aspects | 799 | ||
1. Jurisdiction | 800 | ||
2. Discretion | 800 | ||
B. Scope and Meaning of the Question | 803 | ||
1. “Conformity of the Declaration of Independence with International Law” | 803 | ||
2. The “Authors” of the Declaration | 805 | ||
C. Judicial Appreciation of the Declaration of Independence | 807 | ||
1. General International Law | 808 | ||
a) Non-Existence of a Rule Prohibiting Declarations of Independence | 808 | ||
b) Declarations of Independence and the Principle of Territorial Integrity | 809 | ||
c) The Right to Self-Determination and Declarations of Independence | 811 | ||
d) Appraisal of the Court’s Findings on General International Law | 812 | ||
(1) The Lotus Principle | 812 | ||
(2) Permissive Rules of Secession in the Case of Kosovo | 814 | ||
2. SC Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999 | 817 | ||
a) Applicability of the Resolution | 817 | ||
b) Interpretation of the Resolution | 818 | ||
c) The Authors of the Declaration of Independence | 820 | ||
d) Did the Authors of the Declaration Act in Violation of SC Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999? | 821 | ||
e) Appraisal of the Court’s Findings on SC Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999 | 822 | ||
V. Consequences of the Declaration of Independence on the Validity of the Resolution | 825 | ||
VI. Concluding Remarks | 828 | ||
GERMAN PRACTICE | 831 | ||
WOLFF HEINTSCHEL VON HEINEGG AND PETER DREIST: The 2009 Kunduz Air Attack: The Decision of the Federal Prosecutor-General on the Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings Against Members of the German Armed Forces | 833 | ||
I. Introduction | 833 | ||
II. The Facts Established by the Federal Prosecutor-General | 834 | ||
A. The Capture of the Tank Trucks | 835 | ||
B. The Situation Prior to the Attack | 836 | ||
C. The Attack of 4 September 2009 | 838 | ||
D. Damage and Casualties | 840 | ||
III. Legal Evaluation of the September 2009 Air Attack by the Federal Prosecutor-General | 841 | ||
A. Criminal Liability Under the Code of Crimes Against International Law (CCAIL) | 842 | ||
1. The Legal Nature of the Conflict in Afghanistan | 842 | ||
2. Criminal Liability According to Section 11 (1) No. 3 CCAIL | 843 | ||
3. Other Offenses under the CCAIL | 845 | ||
B. Criminal Liability According to Section 211 of the German Criminal Code | 846 | ||
1. Objective and Subjective Elements | 846 | ||
2. Justification According to International Humanitarian Law | 846 | ||
a) Taliban Fighters as Lawful Targets | 846 | ||
b) Civilians Directly Participating in Hostilities | 847 | ||
c) Collateral Damage | 848 | ||
d) Precautions in Attack | 849 | ||
e) The Relevance of RoE | 850 | ||
IV. Comment | 850 | ||
A. Legal Nature of the Conflict | 850 | ||
B. Lawful Targets | 857 | ||
1. Trucks and Taliban Fighters | 857 | ||
2. Civilians Directly Participating in Hostilities | 859 | ||
C. Collateral Damage and Precautions in Attack | 863 | ||
V. Concluding Remarks | 864 | ||
THOMAS GIEGERICH: The Federal Constitutional Court’s Non-Sustainable Role as Europe’s Ultimate Arbiter: From Age Discrimination to the Saving of the Euro | 867 | ||
I. Introduction | 867 | ||
II. Age Discrimination in Employment Case | 869 | ||
III. Judicial Abstention in Financial Emergencies | 880 | ||
THOMAS GIEGERICH AND OLIVER DAUM: Chechen Rebels as “bona fide refugees”? The Judgment of the Federal Administrative Court of 24 November 2009 | 885 | ||
DANJA BLÖCHER: Retraction of Definitive Administrative Acts After a Change in Case Law | 897 | ||
PHILIPP WENNHOLZ: Refugee Protection for a Leading War Criminal? The Judgment of the Munich Higher Administrative Court of 11 January 2010 | 907 | ||
HENDRIK WIEDUWILT: The German Federal Constitutional Court Puts the Data Retention Directive on Hold | 917 | ||
ALEXANDER PROELSS: Enforcement of the Obligation to Refer to the European Court of Justice Under Article 267 (3) TFEU | 927 | ||
MONIKA KRIVICKAITE AND HANS-CHRISTIAN SCHRÖDER: The New German Federal Nature Conservation Act in the Context of the International Law of the Sea | 935 | ||
BERENIKE SCHRIEWER: Gäfgen v. Germany Revisited | 945 | ||
WIEBKE STAFF: Germany’s National Preventive Mechanism Under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention Against Torture | 953 | ||
TOBIAS THIENEL: Human Rights of Biological Fathers v. Hard and Fast Rules: The Case of Anayo v. Germany | 963 | ||
JULE SIEGFRIED, BERENIKE SCHRIEWER AND PATRICK BRAASCH: The Withdrawal of Germany’s Unilateral Statement on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child | 973 | ||
PATRICK BRAASCH: Deportation of Foreign Nationals Under Article 12 (4) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights | 981 | ||
FELIX BIEKER AND LORENZ FRAHM: Follow-Up: The Implementation of the ECtHR’s Judgment in the Case M. v. Germany | 987 | ||
AMIR MAKEE MOSA AND FRIEDERIKE SEESKO: Can the 2008 Framework Decision on the Fight Against Organized Crime Influence German Criminal Law? | 993 | ||
PIERRE ZICKERT: German Legal Protection Against the European Patent Organisation and Other International Organizations | 999 | ||
OLIVER DAUM: Follow-Up: The Zaunegger v. Germany Case | 1003 | ||
PATRICK BRAASCH: Follow-Up: The European Court of Human Rights’ Pilot Judgment on Excessive Length of Proceedings Before German Courts | 1007 | ||
BOOK REVIEWS | 1011 | ||
Hirad Abtahi/Philippa Webb: The Genocide Convention: The Travaux Préparatoires (CHRISTIAN J. TAMS) | 1013 | ||
M. Cherif Bassiouni (ed.): The Pursuit of International Criminal Justice: A World Study on Conflicts, Victimization and Post-Conflict Justice (BJÖRN ELBERLING) | 1014 | ||
Markus Benzing: Das Beweisrecht vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten (CHRISTIAN J. TAMS) | 1017 | ||
Michelle T. Grando: Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (CHRISTIAN J. TAMS) | 1017 | ||
Anthony Cullen: The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law (ROBIN GEISS) | 1019 | ||
Yoram Dinstein: The International Law of Belligerent Occupation (BENJAMIN M. CLARKE) | 1021 | ||
Yuval Ginbar: Why Not Torture Terrorists? Moral, Practical and Legal Aspects of the ‘Ticking Bomb’ Justification for Torture (BERENIKE SCHRIEWER) | 1024 | ||
Jeremy Waldron: Torture, Terror and Trade-Offs – Philosophy for the White House (BERENIKE SCHRIEWER) | 1024 | ||
Vaughan Lowe/Stefan Talmon: The Legal Order of the Oceans (BING BING JIA) | 1027 | ||
Noam Lubell: Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors (ROBIN GEISS) | 1028 | ||
Daniel Thürer: Völkerrecht als Fortschritt und Chance – Grundidee Gerechtigkeit (STEPHAN HOBE) | 1031 | ||
David Weissbrodt: The Human Rights of Non-Citizens (KATE C. PURCELL) | 1035 | ||
Carl-Sebastian Zoellner: Das Transparenzprinzip im internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht – Konturen und Perspektiven des transparenzrelevanten Einwirkens auf die innerstaatliche Rechts- und Verwaltungspraxis (MARKUS KRAJEWSKI) | 1042 | ||
BOOKS RECEIVED | 1045 |