Itinera Fiduciae
BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Format
Itinera Fiduciae
Trust and Treuhand in Historical Perspective
Editors: Helmholz, Richard | Zimmermann, Reinhard
Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 19
(1998)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
About The Author
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Reinhard Zimmermann, geb. 1952 in Hamburg, Jurastudium in Hamburg. Fachliche Interessen: Römisches Recht, Rechtsgeschichte, Rechtsvergleichung, Privatrecht. Lehrstühle an den Universitäten Kapstadt, Regensburg, Cambridge; Gastprofessuren in Edinburgh, Auckland, Chicago, Berkeley, Yale, Oxford u.a.; heute Direktor am Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht und Professor an der Bucerius Law School. Leibniz-Preisträger (1996); Mitglied mehrerer Akademien der Wissenschaften im In- und Ausland; Präsident der Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes; Vorsitzender der Zivilrechtslehrervereinigung.Abstract
A person may hold property for a variety of purposes. The most common situation is that he wants to use and enjoy it for his own benefit. But he may also have agreed to administer the property either for the benefit of someone else or to further some particular purpose. Thus, in a broad and untechnical sense of the word, he may hold it "in trust". This kind of arrangement has been resorted to for many different reasons, both legitimate and illegitimate. From very early on, European legal systems have been faced with the need to establish rules and, eventually, institutions to deal with the resulting legal problems. $aFiducia, fideicommissum, Treuhand,$z foundation, executorship and, of course, the trust: they all provided, at some time or other and in some place or other, the legal framework that was required.The present volume attempts to present a comparative historical analysis of these devices. It seeks to trace the paths of the idea of "holding for others" or of holding property in a fiduciary capacity: $aitinera fiduciae.$z And it comes to the conclusion that historical connections can be drawn between the English trust and the Continental legal tradition. The common features and the common sources evident on both sides of the Channel mean that no wall of incomprehension separated the English trust from analogous institutions on the Continent. On this account, Otto von Gierke's often quoted remark to F. W. Maitland ("I do not understand your law of trusts") gives a misleading impression. If, as seems to be happening today, modern European law incorporates the trust, there is much to suggest that it will be building upon historical foundations.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Table of Contents | 9 | ||
Richard Helmholz and Reinhard Zimmermann: Views of Trust and Treuhand: An Introduction | 27 | ||
I. Adoption of the Trust in Civil Law Countries | 27 | ||
II. The Inquiry | 30 | ||
III. Prior Scholarship | 31 | ||
1. England | 31 | ||
2. Germany | 34 | ||
3. The Contemporary Situation | 36 | ||
IV. The Problem of Definition | 37 | ||
V. The Contributions | 39 | ||
1. The Slow Emergence of the Concept of the Trust | 40 | ||
2. Mining the Civilian Tradition | 41 | ||
3. Circumventing Legal Restrictions | 42 | ||
4. Trust Purposes | 43 | ||
VI. A Final Word | 44 | ||
David Johnston: Trusts and Trust-like Devices in Roman Law | 45 | ||
I. Introduction | 45 | ||
II. Trust-like Devices | 45 | ||
1. Fideicommissum | 45 | ||
(a) Structure | 47 | ||
(b) Content | 47 | ||
(c) Duration | 48 | ||
(d) Remedies and Third Parties | 50 | ||
2. Fiducia | 52 | ||
3. Usufruct and usus | 53 | ||
III. Trustees | 53 | ||
1. Executors and the familiae emptor | 54 | ||
2. Tutor | 54 | ||
IV. Conclusions | 55 | ||
Harald Siems: Von den piae causae zu den Xenodochien | 57 | ||
I. Einleitung | 57 | ||
II. Das Nachwirken römischer Rechtstexte im Frühmittelalter | 60 | ||
III. Die Briefe Gregors des Großen | 70 | ||
IV. Merowingische Formulare und Testamente | 73 | ||
V. Merowingische Konzilien, Leges und Kapitularien | 78 | ||
VI. Zusammenfassung | 82 | ||
Shael Herman: The Canonical Conception of the Trust | 85 | ||
I. Prelude: The Medieval Church’s Dilemma | 85 | ||
1. The Trust: A Solution to the Church’s Dilemma | 86 | ||
2. The Pope as Trustee; the Church as Primary Beneficiary of the Papal Trust | 86 | ||
II. Possible Objections to the Proposed Canonical Trust Conception | 87 | ||
III. Clerical Efforts to Legitimate Church Wealth | 88 | ||
1. Apostolic collegium | 89 | ||
2. The Metaphoric Hostelry: Use the World, But Do Not Use it Up | 90 | ||
3. Clerical Innkeeper as usuarius | 90 | ||
IV. Clerical usus, Feoffments ad usus, and the Franciscan Friars | 92 | ||
1. Clerical usus and the Franciscan Friars | 92 | ||
2. The Feoffment to Uses: A "Completely English Institution" | 95 | ||
V. Influence of Roman Law upon the Concept of Trust | 96 | ||
VI. Forms of Trusteeship in the Early Christian Church | 98 | ||
1. Christian Custodians | 98 | ||
2. Cemetery Custodian | 98 | ||
3. Custodian of Holy Places | 99 | ||
4. Corpus Christianorum | 101 | ||
5. Bishops as Earthly Dwellers and Spiritual Guides to Life Everlasting | 102 | ||
VII. Church Doctrines and Practices Assist Consolidation of Church Patrimony | 102 | ||
1. Wills | 102 | ||
2. Chantry Foundations | 104 | ||
3. Monastic Finances and Feoffments to Uses | 104 | ||
4. Feoffments to Uses Applied to Specific Spiritual Needs | 106 | ||
VIII. Conclusion | 109 | ||
Joseph Βiancalana: Medieval Uses | 111 | ||
I. The Invention of Uses | 113 | ||
1. Precursors | 113 | ||
2. Origins | 117 | ||
II. The Increased Employment of Uses | 123 | ||
1. The Debtor Feoffor | 124 | ||
(a) Pursuing the Heir | 125 | ||
(b) Pursuing the Feoffees | 126 | ||
2. Daughters | 129 | ||
III. Uses and Wardship | 131 | ||
1. Establishing a Baseline | 132 | ||
2. Social Practice | 133 | ||
3. The Cases: Seignorial Opportunism | 137 | ||
IV. Uses and Chancery | 141 | ||
1. In Search of a Forum | 142 | ||
2. Uses at Common Law | 145 | ||
3. Uses in Chancery | 149 | ||
Richard Helmholz: Trusts in the English Ecclesiastical Courts 1300 - 1640 | 153 | ||
I. Introduction | 153 | ||
II. The Jurisdictional Setting | 154 | ||
III. Uses and Land | 155 | ||
1. The Rise of the Feoffment to Uses in England | 155 | ||
2. The Ecclesiastical Courts and Enforcement | 157 | ||
IV. Uses and Chattels | 160 | ||
1. The Subject Matter | 161 | ||
2. The Trustees | 162 | ||
3. Objects of the Trusts | 163 | ||
4. Remedies and Basis for Liability | 165 | ||
V. Was the Trust Transplanted? | 166 | ||
1. The Negative Side | 167 | ||
2. The Positive Side | 169 | ||
VI. Conclusion | 171 | ||
Neil Jones: Trusts in England after the Statute of Uses: A View from the 16th Century | 173 | ||
I. Introduction | 173 | ||
II. The Difficulty of Definition | 174 | ||
III. Trust Property | 177 | ||
1. The Operation of the Statute of Uses | 178 | ||
2. Chattels Personal | 179 | ||
3. Copyhold Land | 180 | ||
4. Leases | 180 | ||
5. Freehold Land | 181 | ||
IV. The Purposes of Trusts | 181 | ||
1. Evasion of the Royal Feudal Revenue | 181 | ||
2. Charitable Trusts | 183 | ||
3. Private Trusts for the Vulnerable | 184 | ||
4. Trusts and Persecution | 185 | ||
5. Trusts for Married Women | 186 | ||
6. The Attendancy of Satisfied Terms | 189 | ||
V. The Interest of the Beneficiar | 190 | ||
1. The "Engrafting Principle" | 190 | ||
2. Trust and Promise | 192 | ||
3. Privity and the Doctrine of Notice | 196 | ||
VI. Trusts in Context | 199 | ||
1. Trusts and Conditions | 199 | ||
2. Trusts and Bailment | 202 | ||
VII. Conclusion | 203 | ||
Michael Macnair: The Conceptual Basis of Trusts in the Later 17th and Early 18th Centuries | 207 | ||
I. Introductory | 207 | ||
II. Explaining Equity, Explaining Trusts | 208 | ||
1. Background | 208 | ||
2. Fideicommissum | 213 | ||
3. Usufruct | 215 | ||
4. Depositum | 216 | ||
II. Analytic Organisation of the Material | 218 | ||
1. Nottingham | 218 | ||
2. Gilbert | 219 | ||
3. Ballow | 220 | ||
4. Equity Cases Abridged | 221 | ||
III. Trust as Property or Contract? Some Details | 221 | ||
1. The Beneficiary’s Rights | 221 | ||
2. The Liabilities of Trustees | 224 | ||
IV. The Importance of Trusts | 229 | ||
1. Express Trusts are more Important in Concept than in Practice | 229 | ||
2. Implied Trusts are Pervasive: Common Law Trusts | 232 | ||
V. Conclusions | 234 | ||
Karl Otto Scherner: Formen der Treuhand im alten deutschen Recht | 237 | ||
I. Definitionsfragen, Forschungsschwerpunkte, Strategie | 237 | ||
II. Die einzelnen Fallgruppen | 239 | ||
1. Lehnrecht | 239 | ||
(a) Die Veräußerung von Lehngut unter Umgehung der Heerschildordnung | 241 | ||
(aa) Behalten zu treuer Hand | 241 | ||
(bb) Treuleihe | 241 | ||
(b) Umgehung der Lehnsunfähigkeit | 242 | ||
(aa) Frauen | 243 | ||
(bb) Minderjährige | 245 | ||
(cc) Geistliche, Klöster, Ritterorden und Spitäler | 245 | ||
(dd) Städte, Gemeinden und Stiftungen | 247 | ||
(ee) Juden, Bürger und Bauern | 247 | ||
(c) Überwindung der Unteilbarkeit des Lehens | 248 | ||
(d) Erwerbssicherung | 249 | ||
2. Früh- und hochmittelalterliches Stadt- und Landrecht | 249 | ||
(a) Letztwillenstreuhand | 250 | ||
(b) Einschaltung eines Treuhänders zur Überwindung der Erwerbsunfähigkeit im mittelalterlichen Stadtrecht | 251 | ||
(aa) Geistliche, Klöster und Kirchen | 252 | ||
(bb) Spitäler | 252 | ||
(cc) Auswärtige | 253 | ||
(dd) Juristische Personen | 253 | ||
(ee) Eingesessene Nichtbürger | 253 | ||
(ff) Juden | 253 | ||
(gg) Frauen und Minderjährige | 254 | ||
(c) Treuhänder im bäuerlichen Recht | 254 | ||
(d) Einschaltung eines Mittelsmanns zur Erwerbssicherung | 255 | ||
III. Auswertung | 257 | ||
1. Die verschiedenen Funktionen der Treuhand | 257 | ||
(a) Die Umgehungsfälle | 257 | ||
(b) Die Erwerbssicherung | 258 | ||
(c) Das zeitliche Auftreten der Gruppen | 259 | ||
2. Definitionsfragen | 259 | ||
3. Die Vorstellungen der Beteiligten: Treuhand als Institut des mittelalterlichen Rechts | 260 | ||
IV. Ergebnis | 262 | ||
V. Trust und Treuhand | 262 | ||
1. Vergleich der Fallgruppen | 262 | ||
(a) Übertragung eines Lehnsgutes durch den Lehnsmann | 263 | ||
(b) Einsatz eines Treuhänders bei „unmöglichen" Geschäften | 263 | ||
(c) Letztwillenstreuhand | 263 | ||
(d) Grunderwerb durch Kleriker | 264 | ||
(e) Grunderwerb durch „Juristische Personen" | 264 | ||
(f) Lehnsvormundschaft | 265 | ||
2. Unmittelbare Beeinflussung und die gemeinsame mittelalterliche Welt | 265 | ||
3. Vestigia fiduciae? | 266 | ||
Reinhard Zimmermann: Heres fiduciarius? Rise and Fall of the Testamentary Executor | 267 | ||
I. Introduction | 267 | ||
II. Roman Law | 268 | ||
1. Early and Classical Roman Law | 268 | ||
2. Developments in Legal Practice and Surrogate Devices | 271 | ||
3. Greek and Byzantine Law | 273 | ||
III. Medieval Law | 275 | ||
1. The "Nature" of Medieval Germanic Law | 275 | ||
2. Succession in the Germanic Laws | 277 | ||
3. The Influence of the Church | 278 | ||
(a) Dispositions ad pias causas | 278 | ||
(b) Executor ultimae voluntatis | 280 | ||
4. The executor in the Learned Literature | 282 | ||
IV. Usus Modernus in Germany and in the Netherlands | 286 | ||
V. Austrian Law | 289 | ||
VI. French Law | 291 | ||
1. Medieval Customary Law | 291 | ||
2. Dumoulin, Pothier and the code civil | 294 | ||
VII. Developments in 19th Century German Law | 296 | ||
1. Bringing Clarity into an Obscure Institution? | 296 | ||
2. The Long-term Administrator/ Executor | 299 | ||
VIII. English Common Law | 301 | ||
Robert Feenstra: Foundations in Continental Law since the 12th Century: The Legal Person Concept and Trust-like Devices | 305 | ||
I. Different Foundation Concepts | 306 | ||
II. Some Remarks on Developments before the 12th Century | 307 | ||
III. Medieval Romanists and Canonists | 310 | ||
IV. Customary Law in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times | 318 | ||
V. Special Developments in the Dutch Provinces | 319 | ||
VI. Foundations in the 18th and 19th Centuries | 322 | ||
VII. Epilogue | 325 | ||
Michele Graziadei: The Development of Fiducia in Italian and French Law from the 14th Century to the End of the Ancien Régime | 327 | ||
I. Introduction | 327 | ||
II. Scope of Enquiry | 328 | ||
III. The Place of the Roman Law of fiducia in the Age of the ius commune | 331 | ||
IV. The Birth of the Doctrine of Testamentary fiducia | 333 | ||
V. Bartolus, Baldus and the consiliatores on Testamentary fiducia | 335 | ||
1. The Protection Granted to the Beneficiary of the Secret Testamentary Disposition According to Bartolus | 335 | ||
2. Of Form and Substance: Baldus’ Approach to Testamentary fiducia | 338 | ||
3. Bartolus’ and Baldus’ Legacy to the consiliatores | 341 | ||
VI. Humanistic Scholarship and the Rediscovery of fiducia in the Ante-Justinianic Sources | 343 | ||
VII. A Canon Law Detour: fiducia and the Canonical Prohibition of confidentia beneficialis | 346 | ||
VIII. The 17th Century Elaboration of the Doctrine of Testamentary fiducia | 350 | ||
IX. Testamentary fiducia in the Pays de droit écrit of Southern France | 353 | ||
X. Towards the Civil Codes | 355 | ||
XI. Conclusions | 356 | ||
Klaus Luig: Philipp Knipschildt und das Familienfideikommiß im Zeitalter des Usus modernus | 361 | ||
I. Grundsätze | 361 | ||
1. Begriff und Funktion des Familienfideikommisses | 361 | ||
2. Parallelen zum englischen Recht | 362 | ||
3. Der Sonderfall Deutschland | 365 | ||
4. Die anderen europäischen Länder | 368 | ||
II. Philipp Knipschildt und die wissenschaftliche Grundlegung des Familienfideikommisses in Deutschland | 369 | ||
III. Analyse von Knipschildts Traktat | 370 | ||
1. Ursprung, Bezeichnung und Definition des Familienfideikommisses | 370 | ||
2. Einteilung und Arten | 371 | ||
3. Causa efficiens: Mögliche Begründer und Stifter | 371 | ||
4. Mögliche Begünstigte | 372 | ||
5. Einem Familienfideikommiß zugängliche Güter | 373 | ||
6. Art und Weise nebst Form der Errichtung | 373 | ||
7. Zweck | 375 | ||
8. Wirkung der Familienfideikommisse, und zwar erstens in bezug auf die zur Nachfolge berechtigten Personen | 376 | ||
9. Methode und Form der Nachfolge (als Fortsetzung der ersten Wirkung) | 377 | ||
10. Zweite Wirkung: Rechte des jeweiligen Inhabers | 378 | ||
11. Dritte Wirkung: Beschränkungen des jeweiligen Inhabers, insbesondere das Veräußerungsverbot | 379 | ||
12. Vierte Wirkung: Auf dem Familienfideikommiß ruhende Lasten | 382 | ||
13. Rechte und Klagen des Anwärters | 382 | ||
14. Beweis des Familienfideikommisses | 384 | ||
15. Verwandte Erscheinungen (Primogenitur und Majorat) | 384 | ||
16. Auflösung | 385 | ||
IV. Schluß | 387 | ||
Sibylle Hofer: Treuhandtheorien in der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft des 19. Jahrhunderts - Zur Verwendung von historischen Rechtsinstituten in der Zivilrechtsdogmatik | 389 | ||
I. Die romanistische Seite | 390 | ||
1. Regelsbergers Theoriebildung | 390 | ||
(a) „Fiduziarische Geschäfte" | 391 | ||
(b) Regelsbergers Vorbilder | 394 | ||
(aa) ROHG 1872 | 395 | ||
(bb) J. Kohler | 396 | ||
(cc) Jhering | 398 | ||
2. Rechtsgeschichte und Dogmatik | 399 | ||
(a) Scheurl, Huschke | 400 | ||
(b) Dernburg | 401 | ||
(c) Regelsberger | 403 | ||
II. Die germanistische Seite | 406 | ||
1. Rechtsgeschichte und Dogmatik | 406 | ||
(a) Schultze | 406 | ||
(b) Beseler | 408 | ||
2. Schultzes Theoriebildung | 410 | ||
(a) Der Gegensatz zwischen fiducia und Treuhand | 411 | ||
(b) Die Verbindung zwischen fiducia und Treuhand | 412 | ||
III. Ergebnisse | 413 | ||
Joachim Rückert: Kontinuität und Diskontinuität in der Treuhandforschung | 417 | ||
I. Die Problemzugriffe der deutschen Treuhandforschung | 417 | ||
II. Das Beispiel Alfred Schultze (1901 und 1895): Begriffsbetonung im Dienst des Gegenwartsrechts | 418 | ||
III. Das Beispiel Franz Beyerle (1932): ewige Grundformen als bleibende Substanz, aktuelle Lehre und Fingerzeig für die Zukunft | 421 | ||
IV. Das Beispiel Otto Stobbe (1868): Fälle und Funktionen gestern und heute | 422 | ||
V. Bilanz: Kontinuitätsfeststellung, Gleichheitsbehauptung und ceteris paribus. Die Methode vergleichender Funktionsanalyse in Rechtsvergleichung (Hein Kötz 1963) und Rechtsgeschichte | 423 | ||
Andreas Richter: German and American Law of Charity in the Early 19th Century | 427 | ||
I. Introduction | 427 | ||
II. Common European Roots of the Law of Charity | 428 | ||
III. The German Development | 429 | ||
1. The Medieval and Early Modern Period | 429 | ||
2. The Städel Case | 430 | ||
3. The Role of Friedrich Carl von Savigny | 431 | ||
4. Savigny’s Theory of Legal Personality | 433 | ||
(a) Natural Persons (natürliche Personen) | 434 | ||
(b) Legal Persons (juristische Personen) | 434 | ||
5. The Foundation as a Legal Person | 435 | ||
(a) Advantages of a Foundation with Legal Personality | 435 | ||
(b) A Comparison with Mühlenbruch | 436 | ||
(c) The Foundation as a Legal Institution (Rechtsinstitut) | 438 | ||
6. The Memberless Foundation and the Corporation | 439 | ||
(a) The Foundation - An Invisible Legal Person | 439 | ||
(b) The Impact of the German Anstaltsstaat | 440 | ||
(c) Savigny’s Treatment of the Sources | 442 | ||
7. Private Associations, the Stock Corporation and the Private Foundation | 443 | ||
(a) Savigny’s Rejection of Freedom of Association | 443 | ||
(b) "Privileges" of Private Foundations and the Business Corporation | 444 | ||
IV. English Law of Charity | 445 | ||
1. The Reformation | 446 | ||
2. The Elizabethan Statute of Charitable Uses 1601 | 447 | ||
V. The American Development | 448 | ||
1. The "Checkered Career" of the Charitable Trust | 448 | ||
2. The Advantages of Incorporation | 451 | ||
3. The Charitable Corporation as an Incorporated Trust | 452 | ||
(a) Corporate Charters | 452 | ||
(b) Membership and Trusteeship | 454 | ||
(c) Trust Investment | 455 | ||
4. The Law of Charity as a Branch of Private Law | 456 | ||
(a) The Transformation of the Visitorial System | 457 | ||
(b) The Distinction between Public and Private Corporations | 459 | ||
(c) A Declaration of Philanthropic Independence | 459 | ||
5. Constitutional Protection of Charities | 460 | ||
VI. Conclusion | 463 | ||
Stefan Grundmann: The Evolution of Trust and Treuhand in the 20th Century | 469 | ||
I. The Third Party Relationship as Starting Point | 470 | ||
1. Characterization and Key Problems | 470 | ||
2. Effects of the Anglo-American Trust against Third Parties | 471 | ||
3. Lesser Effects of the Treuhand against Third Parties | 471 | ||
(a) The Victory in Theory of a Purely Contractual Concept | 471 | ||
(b) Some Traces of a Property Right Concept | 473 | ||
4. Differences in Concept | 477 | ||
II. The Fiduciary Relationship | 478 | ||
1. The Crucial Importance of the Fiduciary Relationship and Key Problem Areas | 478 | ||
2. The Distribution-of-Assets Question | 481 | ||
3. The Decision-Making-Process Question | 487 | ||
III. Trust, Corporation and the so-called Quasitreuhand | 488 | ||
1. Trust v. Personality or Flexibility v. Registration? | 489 | ||
2. Unity or Pluralism of Interests on the Side of the Settlor and Beneficiary | 490 | ||
IV. Trust and Treuhand Irreconcilable? | 492 | ||
Maurizio Lupoi: Trusts and Civilian Categories (Problems Spurred by Italian Domestic Trusts) | 495 | ||
I. "Domestic" Trusts | 495 | ||
II. The Comparative Law Issue | 497 | ||
III. Trust Instrument and Transfer of Assets to Trustees | 498 | ||
1. From Agreement to Unilateral Disposition | 498 | ||
2. The Unilaterality of the Conveyance | 500 | ||
3. Trusts of Personality | 501 | ||
4. The Creation of a Trust, from a Civilian Perspective | 502 | ||
IV. Contracts, Gifts and Trusts | 504 | ||
George Gretton: Scotland: The Evolution of the Trust in a Semi-Civilian System | 507 | ||
I. Introduction | 507 | ||
1. Defining the Trust | 507 | ||
2. The Influence of English Law | 511 | ||
II. Origins | 512 | ||
1. 19th and 20th Century Ideas as to Origins | 512 | ||
2. The 17th Century and Before | 513 | ||
3. Pre-17th Century Private Arrangements | 513 | ||
4. Fideicommissum and Roman Law | 517 | ||
5. The 17th Century | 518 | ||
6. Proof of Trust | 522 | ||
III. History since the 17th Century | 522 | ||
1. Some Uses of the Trust | 522 | ||
2. Proof of Trust | 524 | ||
3. Immunity to Creditors | 525 | ||
4. Powers | 527 | ||
5. English Influence after 1700 | 528 | ||
6. Doing the Watson Wobble | 533 | ||
7. Mortification, Charities, Public Trusts and Foundations | 533 | ||
8. Constructive Trusts | 537 | ||
9. Frog’s Creditors v. His Children | 538 | ||
10. Resulting Trusts and the Doctrine of the Radical Right | 538 | ||
11. Executry | 539 | ||
IV. Current Law | 541 | ||
List of Contributors | 543 |