Law, Politics, and Morality: European Perspectives I
BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Format
Law, Politics, and Morality: European Perspectives I
Globalisation, Democracy, and Citizenship - Prospects for the European Union
Editors: Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi | Iglesias, Marisa
Schriften zur Rechtstheorie, Vol. 215/I
(2003)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Contents | 5 | ||
Introduction | 7 | ||
I. | 9 | ||
II. | 10 | ||
III. | 11 | ||
I. Globalisation and Multiculturalism | 15 | ||
Neus Torbisco: Building the European Polity: Towards a Multicultural Model of Integration? | 17 | ||
1. Managing Diversity: A Challenge for European Integration | 17 | ||
2. Multiculturalismi Minority Nationalism and Liberal Culturalism | 24 | ||
3. Liberalism and Group Rights | 32 | ||
4. Towards a Postnational Model of Integration in Europe: Some Dilemmas and Contradictions | 40 | ||
5. Conclusion | 48 | ||
References | 50 | ||
Velio Pettai: Prospects for Multiethnic Democracy in Europe: Debating Minority Integration in Estonia | 53 | ||
Introduction | 53 | ||
1. Defining Nationhood | 55 | ||
2. The Estonian State Integration Program | 60 | ||
2.1. Ethnopolitical Transformation | 61 | ||
2.2. The Turn Toward Integration | 64 | ||
2.3. The First Policy Theses | 66 | ||
2.4. Estonian Multiculturalism, Version One | 69 | ||
2.5. Adopting the Final State Program | 71 | ||
2.6. Estonian Multiculturalism, Version Two | 74 | ||
2.7. Minority and Non-Citizen Reaction | 75 | ||
Conclusion | 77 | ||
References | 79 | ||
Maria Laura Tasso: Multimoralism and Multiculturalism Some Reflections on a Proposal of Martin D. Farrell | 83 | ||
1. The so-called Case of the Chador as an Example of Cultural Relativism? | 83 | ||
2. Minors and Mill's Concept of Relevant Harm | 90 | ||
3. The Crisis of the Traditional Concept of Harm - Concluding Remarks | 93 | ||
References | 97 | ||
II. Deliberation and Democracy | 99 | ||
Samantha Besson: Disagreement and Democracy: From Vote to Deliberation and Back Again? The Move toward Deliberative "Voting Ethics" | 101 | ||
Introduction | 101 | ||
1. Deliberation and Disagreement | 106 | ||
1.1. Actual Reasonable Agreement qua Regulative Ideal of Deliberation | 106 | ||
1.2. Deliberative Disagreement | 107 | ||
1.3. Potential Reasonable Agreement qua Internal Logic of Deliberation | 111 | ||
2. The Need for Closure and the Inescapability of Voting | 112 | ||
2.1. The Need for Closure | 113 | ||
2.2. Various Proposals of Modes of Closure | 114 | ||
2.2.1. General | 114 | ||
2.2.2. Non-institutional Modes of Collective Choice | 115 | ||
2.2.3. Institutional Modes of Collective Choice: From Deliberation Through Accommodation to Vote | 116 | ||
3. Voting after Deliberating: A Deliberative Justification of Voting | 119 | ||
4. Deliberative 'Voting Ethics': Voting Ethics from within | 122 | ||
4.1. General | 122 | ||
4.2. The Deliberative Ethics of Voting: Minimal Decisiveness | 124 | ||
4.3. The Deliberative Ethics of Majority Rule: Maximal Decisiveness | 125 | ||
Conclusion | 130 | ||
References | 131 | ||
José Luis Martí Mármol: The Democratic European State: Republicanism and Deliberative Democracy | 137 | ||
Introduction | 137 | ||
1. The European Union and Alternative Models of Governance for Political Integration | 142 | ||
1.1. The Internationalist Model | 143 | ||
1.2. The Supranationalist Model | 145 | ||
1.3. The Infranationalist Model | 146 | ||
2. Political Integration and Models of Democracy | 147 | ||
2.1. Weiler' s Analysis | 147 | ||
2.2. The Competitive Elites Model and the Pluralist Model - Craig's Critique | 148 | ||
2.3. Reopening: Models of Democracy | 149 | ||
2.4. Returning to Weiler: Towards the Reconstruction of a European Ethos | 157 | ||
3. Which Democratic Tradition Should We Choose as a Normative Guide for European Political Construction? | 158 | ||
3.1. A Deliberative, Associative, and Republican Model of Democracy | 160 | ||
3.2. The Obstacle of the Size of the EU and the Democratic Deficit | 164 | ||
3.3. The Remaining Three Obstacles : Which Democratic Model Should We Adopt | 165 | ||
References | 168 | ||
Guillaume Tusseau: Democracy and Information: The Perspective of Jeremy Bentham's Political Panoptism | 175 | ||
Introduction | 175 | ||
1. From Prison Panoptism to Political Panoptism: The Similarities of the Projects | 177 | ||
1.1. A Double Dynamics of Information: The Metaphorical Universalization of Panoptism | 177 | ||
1.1.1. From Individuals to the Legislator: From the Science of Passions to the Science of Legislation | 177 | ||
1.1.2. From the Governors to the Citizens: The Transparency of Power | 179 | ||
1.2. Similarities of Constitutional and Prison Devices: The Real Universalization of Panoptism | 181 | ||
1.2.1. The Basic Principles | 181 | ||
1.2.2. The Details of the Constructions | 182 | ||
2. From Prison to Society: The Ambivalence of Bentham's Doctrine | 184 | ||
2.1. A Controversy Between Scholars | 184 | ||
2.1.1. Panoptism, a Harmful Obsession | 185 | ||
2.1.2. Panoptism, a Limited and Beneficial Project | 186 | ||
2.2. Bentham's Enterprise | 188 | ||
2.2.1. A Coherent and All-embracing Enterprise | 188 | ||
2.2.2. A Practicable Enterprise | 189 | ||
Conclusion | 193 | ||
References | 193 | ||
Internet Sources | 196 | ||
III. Citizenship and the European Union | 199 | ||
Nick W. Barber: Citizenship, Nationalism and the European Union | 201 | ||
1. European Citizenship | 202 | ||
2. Nationalist Sentiment | 209 | ||
3. The Incompatibility of European Citizenship and Nationalist Sentiment | 220 | ||
4. Conclusion | 224 | ||
References | 224 | ||
Maribel Narváez Mora: European Citizens: Rights and Identities | 227 | ||
1. Introduction - Union Citizenship: A Step in an Ongoing Process | 227 | ||
2. Two Sides - of the Same Coin, but Still Two Sides | 231 | ||
3. Union Citizenship as a Legal Status: Objective Aspects | 234 | ||
4. Union Citizenship as Identity or Form of Belonging: Subjective Aspects | 238 | ||
5. Union Citizenship: An Unnecessary and Insufficient Provision to Achieve the Ends of the Union | 240 | ||
6. A Final Remark | 244 | ||
References | 245 | ||
Paolo Comanducci and José Juan Moreso: Epilogue | 249 | ||
About the Authors | 251 |