BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Sack, P., Wellman, C., Yasaki, M. (Eds.) (1991). Monismus oder Pluralismus der Rechtskulturen?. Anthropologische und ethnologische Grundlagen traditioneller und moderner Rechtssysteme / Monistic or Pluralistic Legal Culture? Anthropological and Ethnological Foundations of Traditional and Modern Legal Systems. Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger. Duncker & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-47193-5
Sack, Peter; Wellman, Carl P. and Yasaki, Mitsukuni. Monismus oder Pluralismus der Rechtskulturen?: Anthropologische und ethnologische Grundlagen traditioneller und moderner Rechtssysteme / Monistic or Pluralistic Legal Culture? Anthropological and Ethnological Foundations of Traditional and Modern Legal Systems. Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger. Duncker & Humblot, 1991. Book. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-47193-5
Sack, P, Wellman, C, Yasaki, M (eds.) (1991): Monismus oder Pluralismus der Rechtskulturen?: Anthropologische und ethnologische Grundlagen traditioneller und moderner Rechtssysteme / Monistic or Pluralistic Legal Culture? Anthropological and Ethnological Foundations of Traditional and Modern Legal Systems. Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger, Duncker & Humblot, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-47193-5
Format
Monismus oder Pluralismus der Rechtskulturen?
Anthropologische und ethnologische Grundlagen traditioneller und moderner Rechtssysteme / Monistic or Pluralistic Legal Culture? Anthropological and Ethnological Foundations of Traditional and Modern Legal Systems. Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger
Editors: Sack, Peter | Wellman, Carl P. | Yasaki, Mitsukuni
Rechtstheorie. Beihefte, Vol. 12
(1991)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editorisches Vorwort | V | ||
| Editorial Preface | VII | ||
| Vorwort | IX | ||
| Inhaltsverzeichnis | XIII | ||
| I. Brauch, Sitte und Recht auf dem Wege zum Rechtssystem | 1 | ||
| Munyonzwe Hamalengwa, Toronto: THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ZAMBIA | 3 | ||
| I. Historical Background | 3 | ||
| II. Independent Zambia: Constitutional Basis | 6 | ||
| 1. Judiciary | 8 | ||
| 2. Individual Rights | 8 | ||
| III. Civil Law | 8 | ||
| 1. Law of Succession | 9 | ||
| a) Matrilineal Succession | 10 | ||
| b) Patrilineal Succession | 10 | ||
| 2. Land Tenure System | 11 | ||
| IV. Commercial Law | 11 | ||
| 1. Foreign Investment | 11 | ||
| 2. Business Organization | 13 | ||
| 3. Immigration Law | 14 | ||
| 4. Labour Law | 14 | ||
| V. Courts and Civil Procedure | 16 | ||
| 1. Court Structure | 16 | ||
| 2. Civil Procedure | 19 | ||
| 3. Case Law | 19 | ||
| 4. Reporting Court Decisions | 20 | ||
| 5. Judicial Independence | 20 | ||
| VI. Criminal Law and Procedure | 22 | ||
| 1. Substantive Crimes | 22 | ||
| 2. Investigation and Arrest | 23 | ||
| 3. Bail | 24 | ||
| 4. Evidence and Trial | 25 | ||
| 5. Sentencing | 25 | ||
| 6. Rights of Accused | 25 | ||
| VII. Human Rights | 26 | ||
| VIII. Legal Education and Profession | 28 | ||
| IX. Recent Developments | 30 | ||
| Sang-Bum Han/Kee-Young Yeun, Seoul: DEKOLONIALISIERUNG UND RECHTSKULTUR DER NEU GEGRÜNDETEN STAATEN | 33 | ||
| I. Einleitung | 33 | ||
| II. Die Hinterlassenschaft der Feudaldynastie und der Prozeß der (Teil)-Kolonialisierung | 33 | ||
| 1. Der Prozeß der (Teil)-Kolonialisierung, der Versuch der selbständigen Modernisierung und dessen Vereitelung | 33 | ||
| 2. Der Standort der feudalen Dynastie während der (Teil)-Kolonialzeit | 34 | ||
| 3. Die politische und legale Hinterlassenschaft der Feudaldynastie | 35 | ||
| a) Die Nachteile des bürokratischen Systems | 35 | ||
| b) Der Konfuzianismus und das patriarchalische Großfamiliensystem als Ideologie der feudalen Herrschaft | 35 | ||
| c) Das Verbleiben des feudalen Standesbewußtseins im Produktions- und Arbeitsverhältnis | 36 | ||
| d) Die Hinterlassenschaft des feudalen Kriminalsystems | 36 | ||
| III. Zustand der (Teil)-Kolonie und die Berührung mit einem modernen Rechtssystem in dieser Zeit | 37 | ||
| 1. Der imperialistische Charakter (als Anstoß von außen) der westlichen Rechtskultur | 37 | ||
| 2. Probleme der Rezeption des westlichen Rechtssystems während der Zeit der (Teil)-Kolonie | 37 | ||
| 3. Die Bevölkerung der (Teil)-Kolonie als Leidende des modernen Rechtssystems und seine Hinterlassenschaft | 38 | ||
| IV. Ende der Kolonialherrschaft und Aufgabe und Probleme der Rechtskultur | 39 | ||
| 1. Tilgung der Spuren des kolonialen Rechtssystems | 39 | ||
| 2. Probleme und Aufgabe der Dekolonialisierung | 40 | ||
| M. A. Nezami Talesh, Riyadh: LAW AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN SAUDI ARABIA: THE FORMATIVE YEARS | 43 | ||
| I. The Background | 43 | ||
| II. Law and Legislation | 46 | ||
| 1. The Sharia | 47 | ||
| 2. The Non-Sharia Law | 49 | ||
| III. The Judicial System | 56 | ||
| 1. The Sharia Courts | 57 | ||
| 2. The Non-Sharia Judicial Bodies | 61 | ||
| 3. The Judicial Procedure | 67 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 69 | ||
| References | 70 | ||
| Motoyoshi Omori, Tokyo: COLLECTIVE OBSERVANCE AND COMMUNITY SOLIDARITY. Restraint with Reiterative Folk Rituals in a Sri Lankan and a Japanese Village | 73 | ||
| I. Norms, Sanction and Change | 73 | ||
| II. Shinto and Buddhism in Ninoshima | 75 | ||
| III. Buddhism and Hinduism at Beralapanatara | 77 | ||
| IV. Discussion | 78 | ||
| References | 81 | ||
| Kun Yang, Seoul: LAW AND DEVELOPMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CONTEMPORARY KOREA | 83 | ||
| I. | 83 | ||
| II. | 84 | ||
| III. | 88 | ||
| II. Traditionalismus und Modernismus im chinesischen Rechtsdenken | 91 | ||
| Shing-I Liu, Taipei: RECHT UND GERECHTIGKEIT. Rechtsphilosophie in der traditionellen chinesischen Geisteswelt | 93 | ||
| I. | 93 | ||
| II. | 93 | ||
| III. | 102 | ||
| IV. | 111 | ||
| V. | 121 | ||
| Teh-Koan Liu, Tokyo: TRADITIONAL CHINESE LEGAL THOUGHT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RULE OF LAW IN TAIWAN, R.O.C. | 125 | ||
| I. Forward | 125 | ||
| II. Confucianism was the Most Important Influence in Traditional Legal Thought | 126 | ||
| III. Virtue was the Core of Confucianism, Penalty was Secondary | 127 | ||
| IV. Confucianism Valued Rule of Person Rather than the Rule of Law | 128 | ||
| V. The Renaissance of Legalism in China | 130 | ||
| VI. The Constitutionalization of the Republic of China and the Move to Taiwan | 131 | ||
| Zongling Shen, Beijing: SOCIALIST MODERNIZATION AND LAW IN CHINA | 135 | ||
| I. Economic Development, Economic Structure Reform and Law | 135 | ||
| II. Development of Spiritual Civilization and Law | 138 | ||
| III. Development of Democracy, Political Structure Reform and Law | 141 | ||
| IV. Obstacles to Implementation of the Law | 142 | ||
| Alice Erh-Soon Tay, Sidney: LAW IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA – THE FIFTH MODERNIZATION? | 145 | ||
| Ji Weidong, Beijing: THE TRANSMUTATION AND INNER CONTRADICTION OF LEGAL CULTURE IN CHINA | 155 | ||
| I. Introduction | 155 | ||
| II. Traditional Legal Culture of China | 157 | ||
| 1. Isomeric Social Order and its Intermediate Mechanism | 157 | ||
| 2. Cultural Features of Compound Legal System | 158 | ||
| a) Objectification of Subject | 159 | ||
| b) Hypocrites, Lenience and Litigation-Weariness | 160 | ||
| c) Legal Instrumentalism for the Purpose of Taming the People | 160 | ||
| d) Lowly Status and Mentality of Legal Profession | 161 | ||
| 3. Major Categories of Legal Thinking and Sensations | 162 | ||
| a) “To Know Shame, To be Sagacious” (Confucius) | 162 | ||
| b) Persuasion | 162 | ||
| c) Introspection | 163 | ||
| d) Blend | 164 | ||
| III. Ways and Means of Modernization and its Relationship to the Legal System | 164 | ||
| 1. Mobilization of Resources and Restriction of Rights | 165 | ||
| 2. Social Structure and Requirement of Law | 166 | ||
| 3. What Does Delegalization in the West Mean? | 167 | ||
| 4. Reform of Socialist Economic System and Legalization of Society | 168 | ||
| IV. Conflicts and Crisscrosses in the Rapid Transmutation of Legal Culture | 169 | ||
| 1. The Mixed Structure of Legal Ideology | 171 | ||
| 2. The Awakening to Rights and Dissociation of Subject-Object | 172 | ||
| 3. Between Principles and Expedience | 173 | ||
| V. Conclusion | 174 | ||
| III. Rezeption von Recht in modernen Rechtssystemen | 177 | ||
| Makoto Arai, Tokyo: DIE GRUNDLAGE FÜR DIE ÜBERNAHME DES DEUTSCHEN RECHTSGESCHÄFTSBEGRIFFS | 179 | ||
| I. Problemstellung | 179 | ||
| II. Entstehungsgeschichte des japanischen Zivilgesetzbuches | 180 | ||
| 1. Erste Stufe (1870–1878) | 181 | ||
| 2. Zweite Stufe (1879–1892) | 183 | ||
| 3. Letzte Stufe (1893–1898) | 190 | ||
| 4. Motiv der Übernahme | 193 | ||
| III. Grundlage für die Übernahme | 196 | ||
| John Robert Cassidy, Mahwah: AN UNDERGRADUATE COURSE IN COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDIES | 201 | ||
| I. Comparative Functions of Law | 202 | ||
| II. Language of the Law | 203 | ||
| III. Practical Questions in the Administration of Law | 204 | ||
| IV. Law and the Normative Order | 204 | ||
| H. Patrick Glenn, Montreal: RECEPTION AND RECONCILIATION OF LAWS | 209 | ||
| I. Reception and the Concept of a Legal System | 210 | ||
| II. Functional and Non-Functional Reception | 211 | ||
| III. Reconciliation of Laws | 213 | ||
| Stephen Hicks, Boston: A MODEL OF SOCIETY FOR THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAW | 215 | ||
| References | 221 | ||
| Urpo Kangas, Helsinki: ON STUDYING THE RECEPTION OF LEGAL IDEAS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE LEGAL WORLD VIEW | 223 | ||
| I. The Levels of the Legal World View | 223 | ||
| II. On Studying the Influence of Ideas on the Legal World View | 227 | ||
| Mohammad Koesnoe, Surabaya: THE PRACTICE OF THE DUTCH CIVIL CODE IN INDONESIA TODAY | 235 | ||
| I. | 235 | ||
| II. | 236 | ||
| III. | 239 | ||
| IV. | 240 | ||
| V. | 241 | ||
| VI. | 242 | ||
| VII. | 246 | ||
| Bin Takada, Osaka: DIE REZEPTION DES BEGRIFFS „RECHTSSTAAT“ IN JAPAN | 249 | ||
| I. Vorbemerkung | 249 | ||
| 1. Aufgabenstellung dieser Abhandlung | 249 | ||
| 2. Die Ausgestaltung der Vorstellung vom Rechtsstaat in Deutschland | 250 | ||
| II. Zur Ausbildung des Wortes „hochikoku“ | 252 | ||
| III. Der Rechtsstaatsbegriff in der Wissenschaft | 254 | ||
| IV. Die Vorstellung vom „Rechtsstaat“ innerhalb und außerhalb der Wissenschaft | 257 | ||
| 1. Die Trennung der Vorstellungen vom Rechtsstaat in- und außerhalb der Wissenschaft | 257 | ||
| 2. Ursache und Gestalt der getrennten Vorstellungen vom Rechtsstaat | 258 | ||
| 3. Veränderungen in den verschiedenen Zeitabschnitten – Die Trennung von wissenschaftlicher Auffassung und Volksmeinung | 259 | ||
| V. Überblick | 261 | ||
| 1. Veränderungen nach dem 2. Weltkrieg in der Wissenschaft | 261 | ||
| 2. Volksmeinung | 263 | ||
| IV. Kulturelle Konflikte in und zwischen Rechtssystemen | 265 | ||
| Upendra Baxi, New Delhi: THE CONFLICTING CONCEPTIONS OF LEGAL CULTURES AND THE CONFLICT OF LEGAL CULTURES | 267 | ||
| I. Towards a Jurisprudence of Contradictory Worlds | 267 | ||
| II. Genesis Amnesia and the Discovery of Legal Pluralism | 269 | ||
| III. The Conflicting Conceptions of Legal Culture | 273 | ||
| IV. The Juridical World Outlook: Juristische Weltanschauung | 280 | ||
| V. Towards a Conclusion | 282 | ||
| Masaji Chiba, Tokyo: LEGAL PLURALISM IN AND ACROSS LEGAL CULTURES | 283 | ||
| I. How to Dispose of Nuclear Waste: Japan vs. Pacific Nations | 283 | ||
| II. Conflict between Legal Cultures: Japanese vs. Oceanian | 287 | ||
| III. Role of Legal Culture in Legal Pluralism | 295 | ||
| References | 304 | ||
| Helena Gourko, Minsk: SCIENCE AND MORALS IN NON-WESTERN CULTURED TRADITION | 307 | ||
| Tetsunori Koizumi, Columbus: CULTURAL DIFFUSION, ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE NATION-STATE | 313 | ||
| I. Social Change in an Interdependent World | 313 | ||
| II. Cultural Diffusion | 313 | ||
| III. Economic Integration | 314 | ||
| IV. Culture, Economy and Polity | 315 | ||
| V. Resolving the Conflict among Culture, Economy and Polity | 317 | ||
| VI. The Nation-State in the New World of Global Interdependence | 318 | ||
| VII. A New Consciousness | 319 | ||
| Kálmán Kulcsár, Budapest: POLITICAL CULTURE – LEGAL CULTURE CONFLICTS AND HARMONY. A Study on East-Central Europe | 321 | ||
| I. | 322 | ||
| II. | 325 | ||
| III. | 339 | ||
| References | 340 | ||
| Masaru Miyamoto, Osaka: ‘JUDGES’ IN THE PHILIPPINE HIGHLANDS: A STUDY OF HANUNOO-MANGYAN LEGAL CULTURE | 343 | ||
| I. Introduction | 343 | ||
| II. Methods of Conflict Management and the Socio-Cultural Roles of ‘Judges’ | 343 | ||
| III. Socio-Political Changes and the Judges | 346 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 348 | ||
| References | 348 | ||
| Peter G. Sack, Canberra: LAW, MORALS AND RELIGION A MELANESIAN PERSPECTIVE | 351 | ||
| I. | 351 | ||
| II. | 352 | ||
| III. | 356 | ||
| III. | 369 | ||
| References | 371 | ||
| V. Recht, Umwelt und Weltordnung | 373 | ||
| Jan M. van Dunné, Rotterdam: THE RHINE POLLUTION BY INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES: NEW DIMENSIONS OF THE GOOD NEIGHBOUR DOCTRINE? | 375 | ||
| I. Introduction. The Change from the International to the National Law Approach in Environmental Liability | 375 | ||
| II. Liability for Rhine Pollution in the Courts: the French Potassium Mines Case | 376 | ||
| III. The Sic Utere Principle in International Law and Private Law Compared. The Good Neighbour Doctrine Revisited | 378 | ||
| IV. Environmental Liability in Japanese Law | 381 | ||
| Robert Ginsberg, Media: PEACE AS A HUMAN RIGHT | 383 | ||
| Lawrence Haworth, Waterloo: PSYCHOLOGICAL FREEDOM | 389 | ||
| I. Psychological Freedom as Self Control | 390 | ||
| II. Freedom as Self-Expression | 392 | ||
| William E. Murnion, Mahwah: IDEOLOGY AND HUMAN RIGHTS | 397 | ||
| Rajendra Kumar Nayak, New Delhi: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND LAW: QUEST FOR FUTURE WORLD ORDER | 403 | ||
| I. Developing Countries | 404 | ||
| II. India | 405 | ||
| III. Pragmatic Approach | 406 | ||
| IV. Bhopal and Chernobyl Disasters | 407 | ||
| V. Desertification | 408 | ||
| VI. Deforestation | 409 | ||
| VII. Observations | 415 | ||
| Juhani Pietarinen, Turku: RATIONALITY AND MENTAL INCONSISTENCIES | 417 | ||
| I. Epistemic Inconsistencies | 417 | ||
| 1. Epistemic Opposition and Incongruence | 418 | ||
| 2. Epistemic Discordance | 418 | ||
| 3. Relations between Knowledge and Belief | 419 | ||
| II. Axiotic Inconsistencies | 421 | ||
| 1. Axiotic Opposition | 422 | ||
| 2. Axiotic Discordance | 423 | ||
| 3. Axiological Incongruence | 423 | ||
| III. Combining Epistemic and Axiotic Attitudes | 425 | ||
| Jerzy Wróblewski, Łódź: NATURE AND MAN: DILEMMA OF THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE | 427 | ||
| I. Introductory Observations | 427 | ||
| II. The Man and Nature Relations | 428 | ||
| III. Man and Nature Dilemmas | 431 | ||
| IV. Concluding Remarks | 436 | ||
| References | 437 | ||
| Mitarbeiterverzeichnis (einschl. des Beirats der Herausgeber) | 439 | ||
| Beiträge des 13. Weltkongresses für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Kobe /Japan Gesamtverzeichnis | 442 | ||
| 1. Verlag Duncker & Humblot: Beihefte zu RECHTSTHEORIE, 1991 | 442 | ||
| 2. Verlag Franz Steiner Wiesbaden GmbH: Beihefte zum ARCHIV FÜR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 1991 | 443 |