BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Eckhoff, T., Friedman, L., Uusitalo, J. (Eds.) (1986). Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart / Reason and Experience in Contemporary Legal Thought. Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger. Duncker & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-45894-3
Eckhoff, Torstein; Friedman, Lawrence M. and Uusitalo, Jyrki. Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart / Reason and Experience in Contemporary Legal Thought: Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger. Duncker & Humblot, 1986. Book. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-45894-3
Eckhoff, T, Friedman, L, Uusitalo, J (eds.) (1986): Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart / Reason and Experience in Contemporary Legal Thought: Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger, Duncker & Humblot, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-45894-3
Format
Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart / Reason and Experience in Contemporary Legal Thought
Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger
Editors: Eckhoff, Torstein | Friedman, Lawrence M. | Uusitalo, Jyrki
Rechtstheorie. Beihefte, Vol. 10
(1986)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vorwort | V | ||
| Inhaltsverzeichnis | IX | ||
| I. Systemische Grundlagen der Rechtsvernunft | 1 | ||
| Cees J. Bax, Rotterdam: TWO FUNCTIONS OF LEGAL REASONING | 3 | ||
| I. Legal Practice | 3 | ||
| II. Legal Dogmatics | 6 | ||
| III. Legal Reasoning | 8 | ||
| Henk Jan M. Boukema, Amsterdam: “IS AND OUGHT” AS A LINGUISTIC PROBLEM | 11 | ||
| Jan M. van Dunné, Rotterdam: THE ROLE OF PERSONAL VALUES IN LEGAL REASONING | 13 | ||
| I. Introduction. The Layman and the Judge Deciding Cases | 13 | ||
| II. Nine Theses on Legal Reasoning and the Role of Personal Values | 15 | ||
| III. Discussion of Some Theses | 17 | ||
| 1. Rationality-Intuition. Is-Ought | 17 | ||
| 2. Situational Values | 19 | ||
| 3. Flash or Gestalt | 20 | ||
| Bibliography | 21 | ||
| Elizabeth Flower, Philadelphia: EXPERIENCE AND LEGAL REASONING | 23 | ||
| Denis J. Galligan, Southampton: ARBITRARINESS, LEGALITY, AND DISCRETIONARY POWERS | 31 | ||
| I. | 31 | ||
| II. | 32 | ||
| III. | 35 | ||
| Letizia Gianformaggio, Siena: MODELE DEDUCTIF, MODELE INDUCTIF ET MODELE RHETORIQUE DE RAISONNEMENT JURIDIQUE | 39 | ||
| Hans Petter Graver, Oslo: NORMATIVE AND PURPOSIVE-RATIONAL REASONING. A Case Study of the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate | 47 | ||
| I. Introduction | 47 | ||
| II. The Legal Position of the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate | 49 | ||
| III. The Way in Which the NPD has Exercised its Powers | 50 | ||
| IV. Conclusions | 53 | ||
| Martín Laclau, Buenos Aires: THE GENESIS AND LIMITS OF ABSTRACT REASON IN JURIDICAL THOUGHT | 57 | ||
| I. | 57 | ||
| II. | 58 | ||
| III. | 61 | ||
| IV. | 63 | ||
| V. | 65 | ||
| Aleksander Peczenik, Lund: A MODEL OF LEGAL REASONING | 67 | ||
| I. Legal Practice and Legal Dogmatics | 67 | ||
| II. Criteria of Law, Norms of Legal Reasoning and Evaluations | 68 | ||
| III. The Quasi-Descriptive Character of Contextually Sufficient Legal Justification in “Hard Cases” | 70 | ||
| IV. Transformations in the Law | 73 | ||
| V. Rationality of Legal Reasoning | 77 | ||
| VI. Legal Reasoning and Theory of Science | 80 | ||
| VII. Moral Justification of Legal Reasoning as a Whole | 82 | ||
| VIII. Justification and Form of Life | 85 | ||
| András Sajó, Budapest: TRANSFORMATIONS INSIDE THE LAW. Some Comments on Peczenik | 89 | ||
| I. | 89 | ||
| II. | 95 | ||
| III. | 97 | ||
| IV. | 98 | ||
| Joseph Raz, Oxford (U.K.): THE INNER LOGIC OF THE LAW | 101 | ||
| I. Clarifications | 101 | ||
| II. Directed Powers | 105 | ||
| III. The Directed Powers of Courts | 108 | ||
| IV. Directed Powers and Defeasible Rules | 114 | ||
| V. The Systematic Nature of Law | 116 | ||
| Rolando Tamayo, Mexico City: THE INNER LOGIC OF LAW AND LEGAL HERMENEUTICS. Some Comments on Raz | 119 | ||
| Matti Sintonen, Helsinki: VALUE RELATIVITY AND LEGAL INTERESTS | 125 | ||
| I. The Logic of Questions | 126 | ||
| II. The Intertwinement Thesis | 127 | ||
| III. Two Divisions of Labour | 129 | ||
| Johannes Strangas, Komotini/Hamburg: ZUM PROBLEM EINER TRANSZENDENTALEN DEDUKTION DES BEGRIFFS DES RECHTS | 131 | ||
| I. | 131 | ||
| II. | 132 | ||
| III. | 135 | ||
| IV. | 136 | ||
| V. | 139 | ||
| VI. | 142 | ||
| Jyrki Uusitalo, Helsinki: ÜBERLEGUNGEN ZU METAMETHODOLOGIEN DER RECHTSWISSENSCHAFT | 143 | ||
| I. Metamethodologie als Bindeglied zwischen Philosophie und Einzelwissenschaft | 143 | ||
| II. Metamethodologien in der Rechtswissenschaft | 144 | ||
| 1. Das klassische Modell der Vernünftigkeit des Rechts | 147 | ||
| 2. Die Metamethodologie der Wirklichkeit des Rechts | 149 | ||
| 3. Das Modell der vernünftigen Wirklichkeit des Rechts | 151 | ||
| III. Metamethodologien und Rechtsphilosophie | 152 | ||
| Jacques Vanderlinden, Bruxelles: ARGUMENTATION ET MORALE EN DROIT PENAL BELGE AU XIXe SIECLE | 155 | ||
| II. Systematisierung in Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtswissenschaft | 159 | ||
| Aulis Aarnio, Helsinki: ON CHANGES IN THE SYSTEMATICS OF LAW | 161 | ||
| I. | 161 | ||
| II. | 162 | ||
| III. | 164 | ||
| IV. | 166 | ||
| Carlos E. Alchourrón, Buenos Aires: SYSTEMATIZATION AND CHANGE IN THE SCIENCE OF LAW | 171 | ||
| I. Introduction | 171 | ||
| II. Norms and the Empirical Identification of a Basic Set | 172 | ||
| III. Systematization and the Conceptual Content of a Set of Norms | 175 | ||
| IV. Substantial Transformations of Normative Systems (Changes) | 176 | ||
| V. Aarnio’s Conceptual Scheme | 178 | ||
| VI. Concluding Remarks | 182 | ||
| Jiří Boguszak, Prag: DIE SYSTEMATISIERUNG DER REGULIERUNGSMETHODEN | 185 | ||
| I. | 185 | ||
| II. | 185 | ||
| III. | 185 | ||
| IV. | 187 | ||
| V. | 189 | ||
| VI. | 190 | ||
| VII. | 192 | ||
| Eugenio Bulygin, Buenos Aires: LEGAL DOGMATICS AND THE SYSTEMATIZATION OF LAW | 193 | ||
| I. Preliminary Remarks | 193 | ||
| II. Identification of Legal Norms | 194 | ||
| III. The Systematization | 199 | ||
| IV. Modifications of a Legal System | 203 | ||
| V. Concluding Remarks | 207 | ||
| Pierre Dauchy, Rouen: LA CAUSE DANS LA SYSTEMATIQUE DES ECHANGES | 211 | ||
| Mark Van Hoecke, Bruxelles: LA SYSTEMATISATION DANS LA DOGMATIQUE JURIDIQUE | 217 | ||
| I. La Matière | 217 | ||
| II. Objectifs | 219 | ||
| III. Niveaux de Systematisation | 222 | ||
| 1. Sur le Plan Interne | 222 | ||
| 2. Sur le Plan Externe | 223 | ||
| IV. Méthodes | 225 | ||
| V. Rapports entre la Dogmatique et la Pratique Juridique | 228 | ||
| Roberto J. Vernengo, Buenos Aires: SYSTEMATIZATION IN LEGAL DOGMATICS AND JUDICIAL DECISIONS | 231 | ||
| I. The Systematization Function in Legal Dogmatics | 231 | ||
| II. Systematization and Rationalization | 234 | ||
| III. Legal Systems and Closed Criteria of Decision | 238 | ||
| III. Das Rechtssystem und seine gesellschaftliche Basis | 241 | ||
| Amedeo G. Conte, Pavía: IDEALTYPEN FÜR EINE THEORIE DER KONSTITUTIVEN REGELN | 243 | ||
| Einführung | 243 | ||
| I. Eidetisch-konstitutive Regeln | 243 | ||
| II. Anankastisch-konstitutive Regeln | 247 | ||
| III. Thetisch-konstitutive Regeln | 248 | ||
| Bibliographie | 249 | ||
| Hilmar Fenge, Hannover: PROZESSRECHT UND MATERIELLES RECHT ALS TEILSYSTEME EINER RECHTSORDNUNG | 251 | ||
| I. | 251 | ||
| II. | 252 | ||
| III. | 256 | ||
| Riccardo Guastini, Genoa: SIX CONCEPTS OF ‘CONSTITUTIVE RULE’ | 261 | ||
| I. | 261 | ||
| II. | 264 | ||
| III. | 266 | ||
| Bibliography | 267 | ||
| Nikolaos G. Intzessiloglou, Thessaloniki: ESSAI D’IDENTIFICATION DE LA TOTALITE SOCIALE DU PHENOMENE JURIDIQUE EN TANT QUE SYSTEME | 271 | ||
| I. Introduction | 271 | ||
| II. Problèmes de Méthode | 272 | ||
| 1. La Problématique de l’Utilisation de l’Analyse Systémique dans le Domaine Juridique | 272 | ||
| 2. L’Adaptation Méthodologique de l’Analyse Systémique aux Particularités du Phénomène Juridique | 273 | ||
| III. La Structure de la Totalité du Système Juridique | 275 | ||
| 1. Les Trois Sous-systèmes | 275 | ||
| 2. La Finalité de Dikaiosûne et la Formation du «Topos» Juridique | 277 | ||
| IV. Remarques Finales | 279 | ||
| Werner Krawietz, Münster: RECHT UND MODERNE SYSTEMTHEORIE | 281 | ||
| I. Notwendigkeit und Möglichkeiten einer Zusammenarbeit von Rechtstheorie und Systemtheorie | 281 | ||
| II. Hindernisse einer Kooperation von Rechts- und Systemtheorie | 286 | ||
| III. Systemische Struktur staatlich organisierter Rechtssysteme | 290 | ||
| IV. Aktuelle Tendenzen in der Entwicklung der Systemtheorie und ihre Konsequenzen für eine Strukturtheorie des Rechts | 295 | ||
| V. Juristischer Positivismus oder Systemtheorie? | 302 | ||
| Lawrence M. Friedman, Stanford (U.S.A.): LAW AS A SYSTEM: SOME COMMENTS | 311 | ||
| Marijan Pavčnik, Ljubljana: SELBSTVERWALTUNGSRECHT ALS TEIL DES RECHTSSYSTEMS. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des jugoslawischen Rechtssystems | 317 | ||
| I. | 317 | ||
| II. | 317 | ||
| III. | 319 | ||
| IV. | 322 | ||
| Gregorio Robles, Palma de Mallorca: WAS IST EINE REGEL? | 325 | ||
| I. | 325 | ||
| II. | 327 | ||
| III. | 330 | ||
| IV. | 334 | ||
| Marcelino Rodriguez Molinero, Salamanca: DER SYSTEMBEGRIFF IM RECHT | 339 | ||
| I. | 339 | ||
| II. | 340 | ||
| III. | 341 | ||
| IV. | 341 | ||
| V. | 343 | ||
| VI. | 344 | ||
| José de Sousa e Brito, Lisbon: SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUE IN JURISPRUDENCE | 345 | ||
| I. The Modern Idea of Science and How It Relates to Art or Technique | 345 | ||
| II. Jurisprudence as a Science and as an Art in the “Modern” View | 348 | ||
| III. Objections to the “Modern” View | 349 | ||
| Jean-Louis Vullierme, Paris: SYSTEME POLITIQUE/SYSTEME JURIDIQUE | 353 | ||
| I. | 353 | ||
| II. | 354 | ||
| III. | 356 | ||
| IV. Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts | 361 | ||
| June Axinn, Philadelphia: VALUE CHOICES IN THE DEFINITION OF POVERTY | 363 | ||
| Wahé H. Balekjian, Glasgow: LEGAL REASONING AND ECONOMIC REASONING: INTERACTIONS | 371 | ||
| Eugene E. Dais, Calgary: ECONOMY WITHOUT LAW: PASHUKANIS REVISITED | 379 | ||
| Vladimir Laptev, Moscow: METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH INTO ECONOMIC LAW RELATIONS | 391 | ||
| Robert S. Summers, Ithaca (New York): ECONOMICS AND THE AUTONOMY OF LAW, LEGAL ANALYSIS AND LEGAL THEORY | 395 | ||
| I. Main Theses of This Paper | 395 | ||
| II. The Recent American Movement Applying Economic Analysis to Law: Brief History | 395 | ||
| III. The Claimed Reducibility of Law, Legal Analysis and Legal Theory to Economics and Economic Analysis | 398 | ||
| IV. Is Law Reducible to Economics? | 399 | ||
| 1. Possible Reducibility of Basic Goal or “Driving Force” of Law (legal system) | 399 | ||
| 2. Possible Reducibility of the Subject Matter to Which Law (mainly rules) Applies | 400 | ||
| 3. Possible Reducibility of Substantive Content of Law (mainly rules) | 401 | ||
| 4. Possible Reducibility of Basic Form of Law (mainly rules) | 402 | ||
| 5. Possible Reducibility of Legal Techniques | 402 | ||
| V. Is Legal Analysis Reducible to Economic Analysis? | 403 | ||
| 1. “Positive” Analysis in Law and in Economics – Irreducible Differences | 403 | ||
| 2. “Normative” Analysis in Law and Economics – Irreducible Differences | 404 | ||
| 3. The Unavoidable Element of Fiat in Law and Its Bearing on Normative and Positive Analysis | 406 | ||
| VI. Is Legal Theory Reducible to Economics? | 407 | ||
| Juha Tolonen, Vaasa: ECONOMICS AND THE AUTONOMY OF LAW: SOME COMMENTS | 409 | ||
| I. Introduction | 409 | ||
| II. Utilitarianism and Its Essence | 410 | ||
| III. The Autonomy of Law | 412 | ||
| Robert Weimar, Siegen: ECOLOGY VERSUS ECONOMY IN LAW. Study of a Basic Problem | 415 | ||
| I. Aspects of the Interrelations between Ecology and Economics in Jurisprudence | 415 | ||
| 1. The Exchange of Rights | 415 | ||
| 2. The Problem of Costs of Transaction | 416 | ||
| 3. The Approach to Maximum Welfare with Respect to the Relations between Ecology and Economics | 417 | ||
| II. Interlacing of Economics and Ecology: A Point of Efficiency | 417 | ||
| 1. The Criteria of Efficiency | 417 | ||
| 2. Efficiency in the Case of Environmental Problems | 418 | ||
| 3. Efficiency of an Overall-Welfare Nature | 419 | ||
| III. The Necessity of Scientific Cooperation at Various Levels | 420 | ||
| Personenregister | 423 | ||
| Verzeichnis der Mitarbeiter (einschl. des Beirats der Herausgeber) | 429 | ||
| Beiträge des 11. Weltkongresses für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Gesamtverzeichnis | 433 | ||
| 1. Verlag Duncker & Humblot: Beihefte von RECHTSTHEORIE, 1985 | 433 | ||
| 2. Verlag Franz Steiner Wiesbaden GmbH: Beihefte von Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 1985 | 434 | ||
| 3. D. Reidel Publishing Company: Law and Philosophy Library, 1985 | 435 |