BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Foroni Consani, C., Klein, J., Nour Sckell, S. (Eds.) (2021). Cosmopolitanism. From the Kantian Legacy to Contemporary Approaches. Duncker & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-58460-4
Foroni Consani, Cristina; Klein, Joel T. and Nour Sckell, Soraya. Cosmopolitanism: From the Kantian Legacy to Contemporary Approaches. Duncker & Humblot, 2021. Book. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-58460-4
Foroni Consani, C, Klein, J, Nour Sckell, S (eds.) (2021): Cosmopolitanism: From the Kantian Legacy to Contemporary Approaches, Duncker & Humblot, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-58460-4
Format
Cosmopolitanism
From the Kantian Legacy to Contemporary Approaches
Editors: Foroni Consani, Cristina | Klein, Joel T. | Nour Sckell, Soraya
Beiträge zur Politischen Wissenschaft, Vol. 198
(2021)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
About The Author
Cristina Foroni Consani is Professor of Legal and Political Philosophy at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) and a CNPq (National Council for Technological Development) researcher. In 2010, she was a visiting scholar at the Political Science Department at Columbia University, USA (with CAPES/2010), before receiving her PhD in Moral and Political Philosophy from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil, in 2013.Joel T. Klein is Professor of Moral and Political Philosophy at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), and CNPq (National Council for Technological Development) researcher, and associate member of the Center for Philosophy of the University of Lisbon, Portugal (CFUL). He received his PhD in Moral and Political Philosophy from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Brazil in 2012 and has held visiting scholar positions at Humboldt University of Berlin (HU) (with DAAD funding) and at the Ludwig-Maximillian-Universität München (LMU) (as an experienced researcher of Alexander von Humboldt Foundation).Soraya Nour Sckell is tenured Associate Professor at the NOVA School of Law, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. She is researcher at CEDIS (NOVA School of Law) and at the Center of Philosophy of the University of Lisbon. She is the Principal Investigator of the Project »Cosmopolitanism: Justice, Democracy and Citizenship without Borders« (PTDC/FER-FIL/30686/2017). She received the Wolfgang Kaupen-Preis (German Society for Sociology, section Sociology of Law, 2018) and the German-French Friendship Prize (Ambassy of Germany in Paris, 2012). She has obtained a PhD in Philosophy from the University Paris Nanterre and the Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (thesis in cotutela, 2012) and a PhD in Law from the University of Sao Paulo (USP, 1999). She has done post-doc research at the Universities of Saint Louis (SLU), Nanterre, Frankfurt a.M. and Berlin (Humboldt University) and taught at the Universities of São Paulo (USP), Munich, Metz, Lille, and Lisbon, as well as at the University Portucalense. She has been director of the research program on cosmopolitanism at the Collège International de Philosophie in Paris (2013-2019) and she is the vice-president of the Association Humboldt France.Abstract
This book investigates several dimensions of the concept of cosmopolitanism since Kant. The first of these dimensions is a world vision that considers the construction of a »cosmopolitan self« as a question of justice. The second is the idea that a local political-legal order is fully democratic only if it respects the environment and the human rights of all people of the world, regardless of their citizenship. The third dimension concerns the practice of crossborder associations between individuals, institutionalized or not (cosmopolitics, as Balibar called it). The fourth considers individuals as subjects of international law, as in the case of individual petitions concerning human rights through the European Court of Human Rights and individual responsibility in international criminal law. Finally, the fifth dimension is a form of ecological consciousness based on the relationship between the self and the cosmos, which would imply a profound revision of modern anthropocentric concepts.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhaltsverzeichnis | 5 | ||
| Cristina Foroni Consani, Joel T. Klein and Soraya Nour Sckell, Introduction | 7 | ||
| References | 12 | ||
| Part I. Cosmopolitanism in Modern Philosophy | 15 | ||
| Maria Isabel Limongi, David Hume and “difference” as a cosmopolitan principle | 17 | ||
| References | 30 | ||
| Delamar José Volpato Dutra and Cláudio Ladeira de Oliveira, There are no limits to the rights of a state against an unjust enemy | 31 | ||
| I. Habermas: Kant two hundred years later | 31 | ||
| II. Kant and the Federation of States | 32 | ||
| III. The Schmittian thesis of just war and the tensions between the jurist Kant and the philosopher Kant | 34 | ||
| IV. Kant as a critic of just war theory | 38 | ||
| V. Habermas: are human rights moral rights? | 41 | ||
| VI. Conclusion | 43 | ||
| References | 44 | ||
| Fernando M. F. Silva, Kant and the birth of the pragmatic | 47 | ||
| I. Anthropology beyond anthropology – a new investigational path | 47 | ||
| II. Anthropology and Empirical Psychology. An association towards their dissociation | 50 | ||
| 1. A brief history of the ˋpragmatic' in Kant. The birth of the ˋI as World' | 50 | ||
| 2. The ˋpragmatic' between system and aggregate | 57 | ||
| References | 63 | ||
| Henny Blomme, Kant on the (im)possibility of attaining perpetual peace | 65 | ||
| I. The infinitely progressing approximation | 65 | ||
| II. The unexecutable idea | 66 | ||
| III. The guarantee of perpetual peace | 73 | ||
| IV. Perpetual peace as an interested assumption [interessierte Annahme] | 77 | ||
| References | 78 | ||
| Joel T. Klein, Prudential reasoning in Kant's legal cosmopolitanism | 81 | ||
| I. Outlines of Kant's Legal Cosmopolitanism | 81 | ||
| II. Prudential reasoning in Kant's juridical cosmopolitanism | 84 | ||
| 1. The issue of ends – the rejection of a world monarchy | 84 | ||
| 2. War as means | 86 | ||
| 3. Disanalogy between the formation of states and world republic | 87 | ||
| III. Final remarks | 93 | ||
| References | 95 | ||
| Maria Borges, Kant on cosmopolitan law and the possibility of refugee rights | 97 | ||
| I. Cosmopolitan right | 99 | ||
| II. Is it possible a right of refugees in Kant? | 101 | ||
| III. The spirit beyond the letter | 103 | ||
| References | 104 | ||
| Vinicius de Figueiredo, Two moments of Kantian cosmopolitanism | 105 | ||
| I. The cosmopolitanism in 1764 | 106 | ||
| II. Distinction of analytical plans | 108 | ||
| III. Cosmopolitanism and special metaphysics in 1784 | 111 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 113 | ||
| References | 115 | ||
| Giorgia Cecchinato, Fichte's Closed Commercial State from a cosmopolitan perspective: Identifying agreement in spite of apparent contradictions | 117 | ||
| I. From Review to Immanuel Kant´s Perpetual Peace to the Foundation of Natural Law: Peace and the State | 118 | ||
| II. The Closed Commercial State | 121 | ||
| III. Fichte globally? Final considerations about the relevance of Fichtes proposal | 124 | ||
| References | 126 | ||
| Part II. Cosmopolitanism in Contemporary Philosophy | 127 | ||
| Bethania Assy and Rafael Rolo, Shaman cosmopolitanism: Amerindian resistance and perspectivism | 129 | ||
| Opening remarks | 129 | ||
| I. Viveiros de Castro's multinatural perspectivism: A few coordinates | 134 | ||
| II. Shamanic cosmopolitanism and a sketch-comparison with western cosmopolitism | 143 | ||
| III. The shaman as a resisting posture | 150 | ||
| References | 153 | ||
| Celso de Moraes Pinheiro, Citizenship beyond borders | 155 | ||
| Introduction | 155 | ||
| I. The concept of citizenship in Antiquity | 155 | ||
| II. Freedom and the definition of citizenship | 159 | ||
| III. Contemporary citizenship: a new citizen? | 165 | ||
| References | 171 | ||
| Charles Feldhaus, Cosmopolitism in Habermas: with and beyond Kant | 173 | ||
| I. Introduction | 173 | ||
| II. Some variations in Kant's cosmopolitan conception | 174 | ||
| III. Republicanism and the question of the proper legal framework | 176 | ||
| IV. From scrutiny of the Kantian outline to perpetual peace to reform of the United Nations Organization | 179 | ||
| V. Habermas with Kant beyond Kant | 182 | ||
| VI. The question of distributive justice in the global sphere | 184 | ||
| VII. Final considerations | 186 | ||
| References | 186 | ||
| Cristina Foroni Consani, A constitution without a state? An analysis of the Habermasian proposal for global politics without a world government | 189 | ||
| I. The Habermas cosmopolitan model and the concept of a constitution without a state | 189 | ||
| II. Issues with Habermas's “world politics without world government” and the idea of a constitution without a state | 195 | ||
| III. Habermasian cosmopolitanism as a realistic utopia | 198 | ||
| References | 201 | ||
| Darlei Dall'Agnol, Global bioethics and the need for better international governance | 203 | ||
| Introduction | 203 | ||
| I. What is wrong with the UN regarding bioethical policies? | 204 | ||
| II. Back to Kant: the contractualist justification of a state | 206 | ||
| III. A Kantian proposal | 211 | ||
| IV. Rethinking world governance | 213 | ||
| V. Final remarks | 215 | ||
| References | 215 | ||
| David García Hoyos, Cultural cosmopolitics in Latin America: the case of Cumbia | 217 | ||
| I. What is cumbia? | 221 | ||
| II. Cumbia and cosmopolitanism | 223 | ||
| III. Towards cumbia as an ecology of practices | 225 | ||
| References | 227 | ||
| Marco Antonio Valentim, Cosmology and politics in the Anthropocene | 229 | ||
| I. Getting started | 229 | ||
| II. Entropic nightmare | 230 | ||
| III. Cosmic fascism | 232 | ||
| IV. Why does it never end? | 235 | ||
| V. Visit to the sky | 238 | ||
| References | 240 | ||
| Milene Consenso Tonetto, Global Ethics and Climate Change | 243 | ||
| Introduction | 243 | ||
| I. Global ethics and principles of climate ethics | 244 | ||
| II. Principles for distributing GHG emissions | 246 | ||
| 1. Equal burdens | 247 | ||
| 2. Equal shares or equal quotas issued per capita | 248 | ||
| III. Principles for distributing the costs of combating climate change | 250 | ||
| 1. Polluter-Pays Principle (PPP) | 250 | ||
| 2. Beneficiary pays | 251 | ||
| 3. Ability to pay | 252 | ||
| 4. Hybrid principles: Poverty-Sensitive Polluter-Pays Principle (PSPPP) and the History-Sensitive Ability-to Pay-Principle (HSAPP) | 254 | ||
| IV. Applying hybrid principles: mitigation, adaptation and emission policies | 255 | ||
| Final remarks | 258 | ||
| References | 258 | ||
| Nythamar de Oliveira and João Henrique Salles Jung, Is a cosmopolitan world society possible? A dialogue between critical Theory and the English School | 263 | ||
| Introduction | 263 | ||
| I. The post-national constellation: Habermas, International Relations and constitutional patriotism | 266 | ||
| II. Axel Honneth and the problem of recognition between states | 270 | ||
| III. About the international society: the English School between cultural plurality and moral solidarity | 273 | ||
| IV. Between Habermas and Honneth: The English School and the challenges around a universal normativity | 276 | ||
| Conclusion | 280 | ||
| References | 281 | ||
| Thomas Bustamante, Is there an objective standard of salience for International Law? | 285 | ||
| Introduction | 285 | ||
| I. Kelsenian and Dworkinian arguments for monism in International Law | 285 | ||
| II. In search of a concept of objectivity fit for law | 292 | ||
| III. Pursuing salience in International Law | 296 | ||
| 1. The idea of International Law as a normative social practice | 296 | ||
| 2. Associative obligations and the legitimacy of International Law | 298 | ||
| 3. A discussion of the “lack of community objection” to associative models of legitimacy in International Law | 302 | ||
| 4. Salience reasoning | 305 | ||
| IV. Conclusion | 307 | ||
| References | 307 | ||
| Notes on contributors | 311 | ||
| Index | 321 |