Menu Expand

Sovereign Debt, the Blessing Aspects and the Implications for the Euro Area

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Chiesa, G. Sovereign Debt, the Blessing Aspects and the Implications for the Euro Area. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 89(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.89.1.9
Chiesa, Gabriella "Sovereign Debt, the Blessing Aspects and the Implications for the Euro Area" Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 89.1, , 9-30. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.89.1.9
Chiesa, Gabriella: Sovereign Debt, the Blessing Aspects and the Implications for the Euro Area, in: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 89, iss. 1, 9-30, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.89.1.9

Format

Sovereign Debt, the Blessing Aspects and the Implications for the Euro Area

Chiesa, Gabriella

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 89 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 9–30

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Gabriella Chiesa, Department of Economics, University of Bologna

  • Gabriella Chiesa holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the London School of Economics and is a professor of Economics at the University of Bologna. She has held positions in several Universities, University of Bologna, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, LUISS Rome, University of Leicester, and has been Research Fellow at the International Monetary Fund, Visiting Professor at the Financial Markets Group of the London School of Economics, at the Economics Department University College and the Economics Department University of Leicester. Her research activity is on financial markets and their interactions with the macroeconomy, with special emphasis on the nature and causes of financial markets’ imperfections, financial intermediation, regulation, central bank interventions and sovereign debt. Her research is published in international journals of Economics and Finance, including Journal of Financial Intermediation, Bulletin of Economic Research, Manchester school, Economic Letters, Journal of Economic Theory, Applied Economic Letters, Open Economies Review.
  • Email
  • ORCID profile
  • Search in Google Scholar

References

  1. Bhattacharya, Sudipto, and Anjan V. Thakor (1993): Contemporary banking theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3, 2 – 50.  Google Scholar
  2. Bolton, Patrick, and Olivier Jeanne (2011): Sovereign default risk in financially integrated economies. IMF Economic Review Volume 59, Issue 2, 162 – 194.  Google Scholar
  3. Brunnermeier, Markus K., Sam Langfield, Marco Pagano, Ricardo Reis, Stijgen Van Nieuwerburgh, and Dimitri Vayanos (2017): ESBies: safety in the tranches. Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, 32(90), 175 – 219.  Google Scholar
  4. Bruno, Valentina, and Hyun-Song Shin (2015): Capital flows, cross-border banking and global liquidity. Review of Economic Studies, 82, 535 – 564.  Google Scholar
  5. Chiesa, Gabriella (2019): Safe assets, credit provision and debt management. Open Economies Review, DOI 10.1007/s11079-019-09542-w.  Google Scholar
  6. Cornett, Marcia M., Jamie J. McNutt, Philip E. Strahan, and Hassan Tehranian (2011): Liquidity Risk Management and Credit Supply in the Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 297 – 312.  Google Scholar
  7. Euro-nomics group (2011): European Safe Bonds. http://euro-nomics.com/esb/.  Google Scholar
  8. Froot, Kenneth A., David S. Scharfstein, and Jeremy C. Stein (1993): Risk management: coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance, 48, 1629 – 1658.  Google Scholar
  9. Gorton, Gary B. (2010): Slapped by the invisible hand: the panic of 2007. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  10. Greenwood, Robin, Samuel G. Hanson, Joshua S. Rudolph, and Lawrence H. Summers (2014): Government debt management at the zero lower bound. Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings WP N° 5.  Google Scholar
  11. Greenwood, Robin, Samuel G. Hanson, and Jeremy C. Stein (2015): A comparative-sdvantage approach to government debt maturity. Journal of Finance, 70, 1683 – 1722.  Google Scholar
  12. Greenwood, Robin, and Dimitri Vayanos (2014): Bond supply and excess bond returns. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 663 – 713.  Google Scholar
  13. Holmstrom, Bengt, and Jean Tirole (1998): Private and public supply of liquidity. Journal of Political economy, 106, 1 – 40.  Google Scholar
  14. Holmstrom, Bengt, and Jean Tirole (2011): Inside and outside liquidity. MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  15. Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, and John Moore (2018): Liquidity, business cycles, and monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy forthcoming.  Google Scholar
  16. Krishnamurthy, Arvind, and Annette Vissing-Jorgensen (2012): The aggregate demand for treasury debt. Journal of Political Economy, 120, 233 – 267.  Google Scholar
  17. Lane, Philip, and Sam Langfield (2018): The Feasibility of Sovereign Bond-Backed Securities for the euro Area. VoxEU.  Google Scholar
  18. Nyborg, Kjell G. (2011): The Euro Area Sovereign Debt Crisis: Secure the Debt and Modify Haircuts. Swiss Finance Institute, Occasional Paper Series 11 – 01.  Google Scholar
  19. Pozsar, Zoltan (2011): Institutional Cash Pools and the Triffin Dilemma of the US Banking System. IMF WP/11/190.  Google Scholar
  20. Singh, Manmohan, and Peter Stella (2012): Money and collateral. IMF WP/12/95.  Google Scholar
  21. Stein, Jeremy C. (2011): Monetary policy as financial stability regulation. NBER WP 16883.  Google Scholar
  22. Strahan, Philip (2008): Liquidity production in 21st century banking. NBER WP 13798.  Google Scholar
  23. Thakor, Anjan V., Hai Hong, and Stuart Greenbaum (1981): Bank loan commitments and interest rate volatility”. Journal of Banking and Finance, 51, 497 – 510.  Google Scholar
  24. Woodford, Michael (1990): Public debt as private liquidity. American Economic Review, 80, 382 – 388.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Summary: The Euro area has a unique monetary authority that governs money creation, but several individual-countries’ sovereign debts that differ in terms of safety. We analyse: i) the interactions between the financial and real sector in such an environment; ii) the role of government bonds as liquidity instruments; iii) whether and how the correlation structure of the sovereign-bonds’ market values affects the portfolio composition of liquidity instruments and prices, and the scope for a debt management policy at the Euro area level.