Menu Expand
  1. Journals
  2. Society & Social Sciences
  3. Sozialer Fortschritt
  4. Vol. 65, Issue 1–2
  5. pp. 45–50

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Fliegauf, M., Spiess-Knafl, W. Investition, Innovation, sozialer Fortschritt – Ehernes Gesetz oder Trias der Beliebigkeit?. Sozialer Fortschritt, 65(1–2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.45
Fliegauf, Mark T. and Spiess-Knafl, Wolfgang "Investition, Innovation, sozialer Fortschritt – Ehernes Gesetz oder Trias der Beliebigkeit?" Sozialer Fortschritt 65.1–2, 2016, 45-50. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.45
Fliegauf, Mark T./Spiess-Knafl, Wolfgang (2016): Investition, Innovation, sozialer Fortschritt – Ehernes Gesetz oder Trias der Beliebigkeit?, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, vol. 65, iss. 1–2, 45-50, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.45
Format
Download

Investition, Innovation, sozialer Fortschritt – Ehernes Gesetz oder Trias der Beliebigkeit?

Fliegauf, Mark T. | Spiess-Knafl, Wolfgang

Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 65 (2016), Iss. 1–2 : pp. 45–50

Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.45
Language
German
Pages
6

Pricing

Individual
€ 15.90 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Fliegauf, Mark, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, Beisheim Center, Berliner Freiheit 2, 10785 Berlin

Spiess-Knafl, Dr. Wolfgang, Zeppelin Universität, Am Seemooser Horn 20, 88045 Friedrichshafen

References

  1. Abrams, B. A./Schitz, M. D. (1978): The ,Crowding-Out‘ Effect of Governmental Transfers on Private Charitable Contributions, Public Choice 33(1), S. 29 – 39.  Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J./Payne, A. (2011): Is Crowding Out Due Entirely to Fundraising? Evidence from a Panel of Charities, Journal of Public Economics 95(5 – 6), S. 334 – 343.  Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A./Norman, W. (2011): Lighting The Touchpaper. Growing the Market for Social Investment in England, London.  Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A./Swersky, A. (2012): The First Billion. A Forecast of Social Investment Demand, London.  Google Scholar
  5. Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege (BAGFW) (2014): Die Freie Wohlfahrtspflege ‒ Von Menschen für Menschen, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  6. Bundesministerium der Finanzen (BMF) (2015): Bundeshaushalt 2015, http://www.bundeshaushalt-info.de/startseite/#/2015/soll/ausgaben/einzelplan.html, Stand: 29.01.2015.  Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, R./Sahlman, W. A. (2013): Social Impact Investing Will Be the New Venture Capital, Harvard Business Review (Online), 17.01.2013, https://hbr.org/2013/01/social-impact-investing-will-b/, Stand: 11.11.2014.  Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, R./Zelnick, J. (2015): What We Learned from the Failure of the Rikers Island Social Impact Bond, Nonprofit Quarterly (Online), 07.08.2015, http://nonprofitquarterly.org/2015/08/07/what-we-learned-from-the-failure-of-the-rikers-island-socialimpact-bond/, Stand: 17.08.2015.  Google Scholar
  9. De Carlo, L./Fliegauf, M. T. (2015): Vorfinanzierung leicht(er) machen. Die Investorenseite des Sozialen Wirkungskredits, Berlin, September.  Google Scholar
  10. Deckop, J. R./Cirka, C. C. (2000): The Risk and Reward of a Double-Edged Sword. Effects of a Merit Pay Program on Intrinsic Motivation, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29(3), S. 400 – 418.  Google Scholar
  11. Fliegauf, M. T. (2014): Sozialer Wirkungskredit. Strukturen, Potenziale, Herausforderungen, Berlin, Dezember.  Google Scholar
  12. Fliegauf, M. T./Unterhofer, U. (2015): Sozialer Wirkungskredit. Innovationstreiber mit Substanz? Berlin, Januar.  Google Scholar
  13. Gerny D. (2015): Arbeitsmarkt-Integration von Flüchtlingen. Berner Unternehmer initiieren Pilotprojekt. Neue Züricher Zeitung (online), 16.06.2015, http://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/berner-unternehmer-wollen-integration-von-fluechtlingen-mittragen-1.18563594, Stand: 17.08.2015.  Google Scholar
  14. Heister, P. (2010): Finanzierung von Social Entrepreneurship durch Venture Philanthropy und Social Venture Capital, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  15. James, E. (1998): Commercialism among Nonprofits. Objectives, Opportunities, and Constraints, in: Weisbrod, B. A. (Eds.), To Profit or Not to Profit. The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, Cambridge, 271 – 286.  Google Scholar
  16. Jansen, S. A./Heinze, R. G./Beckmann, M. (2013): Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  17. John, R. (2006): Venture Philanthropy ‒ The Evolution of High Engagement Philanthropy in Europe, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  18. Krimmer, H./Priemer, J. (2013): ZiviZ-Survey 2012. Zivilgesellschaft verstehen, Berlin, November.  Google Scholar
  19. Nock, L./Mildenberger, G. (2013): Soziale Innovationen in den Spitzenverbänden der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege – Strukturen, Prozesse und Zukunftsperspektiven, Heidelberg.  Google Scholar
  20. Reinhart, C. M./Rogoff, K. S. (2009): This Time is Different. Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton.  Google Scholar
  21. Roder, B. (2010): Reporting im Social Entrepreneurship. Konzeption einer externen Unternehmensberichterstattung für soziale Unternehmer, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  22. Scheuerle, T./Glänzel, G./Knust, R./Then, V. (2013): Social Entrepreneurship in Deutschland: Potentiale und Wachstumsproblematiken, Heidelberg, August.  Google Scholar
  23. Schroeder, W./Neufeind, M./Jantz, B. (2014): Erwachen die schlafenden Riesen? Warum die deutschen Sozialversicherungen als aktive Gestalter vorsorgender Sozialpolitik gebraucht werden, Berlin, März.  Google Scholar
  24. Segal, L. M./Weisbrod, B. A. (1998): Interdependence of Commercial and Donative Revenues, in: Weisbrod, B. A. (Eds.), To Profit or Not to Profit. The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, Cambridge, 105 – 128.  Google Scholar
  25. Social Finance (2014a): The Global Social Impact Bond Market, London, August.  Google Scholar
  26. Social Finance (2014b): Peterborough Social Impact Bond Reduces Reoffending by 8.4 %; Investors on Course for Payment in 2016, Pressemitteilung, 07.08.2014, London.  Google Scholar
  27. Spiess-Knafl, W. (2012): Finanzierung von Sozialunternehmen. Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse, Dissertation, München.  Google Scholar
  28. Spiess-Knafl, W./Jansen, S. A. (2013): Imperfections in the Social Investment Market and Options on How to Address Them. Ex-Ante Evaluation for the European Commission, Brüssel, November.  Google Scholar
  29. Ward, E. (2015a): Bridges Ventures backs UK’s first active healthcare SIB. Pioneer Post, 30.03.2015, http://www.pioneerspost.com/news-views/20150330/bridges-ventures-backs-uksfirst-active-healthcare-sib, Stand: 18.08.2015.  Google Scholar
  30. Ward, E. (2015b): Triple triumph: three UK SIBs return investor capital. Pioneer Post, 17.07.2015, http://www.pioneerspost.com/news-views/20150715/triple-threat-three-uk-social-impactbonds-return-investor-capital, Stand: 18.08.2015.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Investment, Innovation, Social Progress – Causal Chain or Make-believe?

This article analyzes the opportunities and challenges presented by new social finance instruments and mechanisms. The causal chain that increased capital leads to a higher degree of social innovation and thus social impact seems intuitive. The authors highlight that underfunding actually hampers innovation in the social sector.

Furthermore, they discuss novel financing techniques and instruments such as convertible grants, and in particular, Social Impact Bonds. The analysis concludes that increased finance through new mechanisms and instruments spurs social innovation. However, a link between innovation and social impact has yet to be established, as the empirical evidence remains limited.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Mark T. Fliegauf / Wolfgang Spiess-Knafl: Investition, Innovation, sozialer Fortschritt ‒ Ehernes Gesetz oder Trias der Beliebigkeit? 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.